Why ChatGPT doesn't think: an argument from rationality

被引：0

作者：

Stoljar, Daniel ^{[1
]}

Zhang, Zhihe Vincent ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Philosophy, Res Sch Social Sci, Coll Arts & Social Sci, Level 6,146 Ellery Crescent, Acton, ACT 2601, Australia

来源：

INQUIRY-AN INTERDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY | 2024年

关键词：

Artificial intelligence; large language models; ChatGPT; thought; rationality; inference;

D O I：

10.1080/0020174X.2024.2427061

中图分类号：

B82 [伦理学（道德学）];

学科分类号：

摘要：

Can AI systems such as ChatGPT think? We present an argument from rationality for the negative answer to this question. The argument is founded on two central ideas. The first is that if ChatGPT thinks, it is not rational, in the sense that it does not respond correctly to its evidence. The second idea, which appears in several different forms in philosophical literature, is that thinkers are by their nature rational. Putting the two ideas together yields the result that ChatGPT is not a thinker. The paper sets out the argument in detail and shows how it can withstand numerous objections. We end the paper by contrasting the argument from rationality with a more well-known argument often taken to show that ChatGPT doesn't think, due to Bender and Koller.

引用

页数：29

共 31 条

[1] Bender E. M., 2020, P 58 ANN M ASS COMP, P5185, DOI DOI 10.18653/V1/2020.ACL-MAIN.463
[2] On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big?
Bender, Emily M.
Gebru, Timnit
McMillan-Major, Angelina
Shmitchell, Shmargaret
[J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 ACM CONFERENCE ON FAIRNESS, ACCOUNTABILITY, AND TRANSPARENCY, FACCT 2021, 2021, : 610 - 623
[3] Berglund Lukas, 2024, 12 ANN INT C LEARN R
[4] Braddon-Mitchell David., 2006, Philosophy of Mind and Cognition: An Introduction, V2nd ed
[5] Putting Thoughts to Work: Concepts, Systematicity, and Stimulus-Independence
Camp, Elisabeth
[J]. PHILOSOPHY AND PHENOMENOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2009, 78 (02) : 275 - 311
[6] Chalmers D. J., 2023, Boston Review,August 9
[7] Chang R., 2013, Oxford Studies in Metaethics, V8, P74, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199678044.003.0004
[8] Chollet F., 2021, Deep Learning with Python
[9] Christiano PF, 2017, ADV NEUR IN, V30
[10] Coulter Martin, 2023, Reuters, February 9

← 1 2 3 4 →