Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Identification Card and Codification of the Chemical and Morphological Characteristics of 14 Dental Implant Surfaces
    Ehrenfest, David M. Dohan
    Vazquez, Lydia
    Park, Yeong-Joon
    Sammartino, Gilberto
    Bernard, Jean-Pierre
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 37 (05) : 525 - 542
  • [42] The impact of implant-related characteristics on dental implant blooming: An in vitro study
    Tarce, Mihai
    de Greef, Alexander
    Lahoud, Pierre
    Vasconcelos, Karla de Faria
    Jacobs, Reinhilde
    Quirynen, Marc
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (12) : 1199 - 1211
  • [43] Influence of nicotine administration on different implant surfaces: A histometric study in rabbits
    Stefani, CM
    Filho, GRN
    Sallum, EA
    de Toledo, S
    Sallum, AW
    Nociti, FH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2002, 73 (02) : 206 - 212
  • [44] The Soft Tissue Immunologic Response to Hydroxyapatite-Coated Transmucosal Implant Surfaces: A Study in Humans
    De Wilde, Elisabeth A. W. J.
    Jimbo, Ryo
    Wennerberg, Ann
    Naito, Yoshihito
    Coucke, Paul
    Bryington, Matthew S.
    Vandeweghe, Stefan
    De Bruyn, Hugo
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2015, 17 : E65 - E74
  • [45] Comparison of the Biological Behavior and Topographical Surface Assessment of a Minimally Invasive Dental Implant and a Standard Implant: An In Vitro Study
    Attik, Nina
    Phantarasmy, Marina
    Abouelleil, Hazem
    Chevalier, Charlene
    Barraco, Aurore
    Grosgogeat, Brigitte
    Lafon, Arnaud
    [J]. MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (21)
  • [46] Histomorphometric evaluation of bone response to different titanium implant surfaces
    Le Guehennec, L.
    Goyenvalle, E.
    Lopez-Heredia, M. A.
    Weiss, P.
    Amouriq, Y.
    Layrolle, P.
    [J]. BIOCERAMICS, VOL 20, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, 361-363 : 613 - +
  • [47] Impulse response of a dental implant in bone by numerical analysis
    Williams, KR
    Williams, ADC
    [J]. BIOMATERIALS, 1997, 18 (10) : 715 - 719
  • [48] In vivo and in vitro biofilm formation on two different titanium implant surfaces
    Buergers, Ralf
    Gerlach, Till
    Hahnel, Sebastian
    Schwarz, Frank
    Handel, Gerhard
    Gosau, Martin
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2010, 21 (02) : 156 - 164
  • [49] Effect of different dental implant drilling template designs on heat generation during osteotomy - an in vitro study
    Waltenberger, Lukas
    Wied, Stephanie
    Wolfart, Stefan
    Tuna, Taskin
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2022, 33 (01) : 53 - 64
  • [50] The Biological Impact of Residual Aluminum Particles on Sand-Blasted Dental Implant Surfaces: A Systematic Review of Animal Studies
    Panda, Sourav
    Tumedei, Margherita
    Panda, Sital
    Goker, Funda
    Depalma, Cristina Maria
    Pande, Tejas
    Del Fabbro, Massimo
    [J]. APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2024, 14 (17):