Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces
    Augthun, M
    Tinschert, J
    Huber, A
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (08) : 857 - 864
  • [32] The evaluation of prepared microstructure pattern by carbon-dioxide laser on zirconia-based ceramics for dental implant application: an in vitro study
    Ghalandarzadeh, Arash
    Javadpour, Jafar
    Majidian, Hudsa
    Ganjali, Monireh
    ODONTOLOGY, 2023, 111 (03) : 580 - 599
  • [33] Microgrooves and Microrugosities in Titanium Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro and In Vivo Evaluation
    Gehrke, Sergio Alexandre
    Cavalcanti de Lima, Jose Henrique
    Rodriguez, Fernando
    Luis Calvo-Guirado, Jose
    Aramburu Junior, Jaime
    Perez-Diaz, Leticia
    Mazon, Patricia
    Manuel Aragoneses, Juan
    De Aza, Piedad N.
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (08)
  • [34] In vitro sealing ability of two materials at five different implant-abutment surfaces
    Duarte, Antonio R. C.
    Rossetti, Paulo H. O.
    Rossetti, Leylha M. N.
    Torres, Sergio A.
    Bonachela, Wellington C.
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (11) : 1828 - 1832
  • [35] Topographic characterization of multispecies biofilms growing on dental implant surfaces: An in vitro model
    Bermejo, Patricia
    Carmen Sanchez, Maria
    Llama-Palacios, Arancha
    Figuero, Elena
    Herrera, David
    Sanz, Mariano
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2019, 30 (03) : 229 - 241
  • [36] Rational design and in vitro characterization of novel dental implant and abutment surfaces for balancing clinical and biological needs
    Milleret, Vincent
    Lienemann, Philipp S.
    Gasser, Angelines
    Bauer, Sebastian
    Ehrbar, Martin
    Wennerberg, Ann
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2019, 21 : 15 - 24
  • [37] Novel Application of Cytodetachment Technology to the Analysis of Dental Implant Surfaces
    Bhatavadekar, Neel B.
    Hu, Jerry
    Keys, Kevin
    Ofek, Gidon
    Athanasiou, Kyriacos A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2011, 26 (05) : 985 - 990
  • [38] Microbiologic and radiographic analysis of ligature-induced peri-implantitis with different dental implant surfaces
    Shibli, JA
    Martins, MC
    Lotufo, RFM
    Marcantonio, E
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2003, 18 (03) : 383 - 390
  • [39] Comparison of Measurements of Implant Stability by Two Different Radio Frequency Analysis Systems: An In Vitro Study
    Koyuncuoglu, Cenker Zeki
    Demir, Becen
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED ORAL RESEARCH, 2020, 11 (02) : 202 - 207
  • [40] Bacterial Colonization of the Dental Implant Fixture-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study
    Tesmer, Michael
    Wallet, Shannon
    Koutouzis, Theofilos
    Lundgren, Tord
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2009, 80 (12) : 1991 - 1997