Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Biofilms Developed on Dental Implant Titanium Surfaces with Different Roughness: Comparison Between In Vitro and In Vivo Studies
    Bevilacqua, Lorenzo
    Milan, Annalisa
    Del Lupo, Veronica
    Maglione, Michele
    Dolzani, Lucilla
    CURRENT MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 75 (06) : 766 - 772
  • [22] The Effect of Ultraviolet Photofunctionalization on a Titanium Dental Implant with Machined Surface: An In Vitro and In Vivo Study
    Lee, Jun-Beom
    Jo, Ye-Hyeon
    Choi, Jung-Yoo
    Seol, Yang-Jo
    Lee, Yong-Moo
    Ku, Young
    Rhyu, In-Chul
    Yeo, In-Sung Luke
    MATERIALS, 2019, 12 (13)
  • [23] Clinical Applications of Photofunctionalization on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Narrative Review
    Chang, Li-Ching
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2022, 11 (19)
  • [24] Influence of Three Dental Implant Surfaces on Cell Viability and Bone Behavior. An In Vitro and a Histometric Study in a Rabbit Model
    Rizo-Gorrita, Maria
    Fernandez-Asian, Ignacio
    Garcia-de-Frenza, Andreina
    Vazquez-Pachon, Celia
    Serrera-Figallo, Maria-Angeles
    Torres-Lagares, Daniel
    Gutierrez-Perez, Jose-Luis
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2020, 10 (14):
  • [25] Histologic evaluation of early human bone response to different implant surfaces
    Grassi, Sauro
    Piattelli, Adriano
    de Figueiredo, Luciene Cristina
    Feres, Magda
    de Melo, Leandro
    Lezzi, Giovanna
    Alba, Rodolfo Candia, Jr.
    Shibli, Jamil Awad
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 2006, 77 (10) : 1736 - 1743
  • [26] Photofunctionalization of Dental Implant Surfaces - A Histomorphometric Animal Study
    Paul, Veena
    Mathew, Aby T.
    Rasheed, Nazia
    Thomas, Annie Susan
    George, Nebu
    JOURNAL OF PHARMACY AND BIOALLIED SCIENCES, 2023, 15 : S646 - S650
  • [27] A Hydrophilic Dental Implant Surface Exhibit Thrombogenic Properties In Vitro
    Hong, Jaan
    Kurt, Seta
    Thor, Andreas
    CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (01) : 105 - 112
  • [28] Adherent Endotoxin on Dental Implant Surfaces: A Reappraisal
    Morra, Marco
    Cassinelli, Clara
    Bollati, Daniele
    Cascardo, Giovanna
    Bellanda, Marco
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2015, 41 (01) : 10 - 16
  • [29] Cell Behavior Related to Implant Surfaces with Different Microstructure and Chemical Composition: An In Vitro Analysis
    Conserva, Enrico
    Lanuti, Anna
    Menini, Maria
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2010, 25 (06) : 1099 - 1107
  • [30] In vitro studies on the effect of cleaning methods on different implant surfaces
    Augthun, M
    Tinschert, J
    Huber, A
    JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY, 1998, 69 (08) : 857 - 864