Analysis of the Cellular Response to Different Dental Implant Surfaces: An In vitro Study

被引:0
|
作者
Sghaireen, Mohammed G. [1 ]
Alrwuili, Mohammad Raji [2 ]
Alenzi, Nasser Attallah [3 ]
Aljabab, Mohammed Ahmed [2 ]
Issrani, Rakhi [4 ]
Alam, Mohammad Khursheed [4 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prosthodont Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[2] Qurayyat Specialized Dent Ctr, Orthodont Dept, Al Qurayyat, Saudi Arabia
[3] Western Riyadh Dent Complex, Orthodont Dept, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
[4] Jouf Univ, Coll Dent, Prevent Dent Dept, Sakaka 72345, Saudi Arabia
[5] Saveetha Inst Med & Tech Sci, Saveetha Dent Coll & Hosp, Dept Dent Res Cell, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
[6] Daffodil Int Univ, Fac Allied Hlth Sci, Dept Publ Hlth, Dhaka, Bangladesh
关键词
Cellular response; dental implants; in vitro study; osseointegration; surface modification; TITANIUM IMPLANTS; INTEGRATION; TOPOGRAPHY;
D O I
10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_329_24
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Dental implant surfaces play a crucial role in determining the success of osseointegration and long-term stability. Understanding the cellular response to various implant surfaces is essential for optimizing implant design and clinical outcomes. Materials and Methods: In this in vitro study, we investigated the cellular response to different dental implant surfaces. Titanium implants with three distinct surface treatments (polished, acid-etched, and sandblasted) were prepared. Human osteoblast-like cells were cultured on these surfaces, and cellular behaviors including adhesion, proliferation, and morphology were evaluated using standard assays and imaging techniques. Results: Our results revealed significant differences in cellular responses among the different implant surfaces. Cells exhibited higher adhesion and proliferation rates on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces compared to the polished surface. Furthermore, cells displayed a more spread-out morphology with well-defined filopodia and lamellipodia on the acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces, indicating enhanced cellular interaction and spreading. Conclusion: The cellular response to dental implant surfaces varies depending on surface characteristics. Acid-etched and sandblasted surfaces promote better cellular adhesion, proliferation, and spreading compared to polished surfaces. These findings underscore the importance of surface modifications in enhancing osseointegration and ultimately improving the success rates of dental implant procedures.
引用
收藏
页码:S2521 / S2523
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] In Vitro Characterization of an Anodized Surface of a Dental Implant Collar and Dental Abutment on Peri-Implant Cellular Response
    Traver-Mendez, Valeria
    Camps-Font, Octavi
    Ventura, Francesc
    Nicolau-Sanso, Miquel Angel
    Subira-Pifarre, Carles
    Figueiredo, Rui
    Valmaseda-Castellon, Eduard
    MATERIALS, 2023, 16 (17)
  • [2] Plasma of Argon Affects the Earliest Biological Response of Different Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Comparative Study
    Canullo, L.
    Genova, T.
    Tallarico, M.
    Gautier, G.
    Mussano, F.
    Botticelli, D.
    JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 2016, 95 (05) : 566 - 573
  • [3] Comprehensive Evaluation of Novel Biomaterials for Dental Implant Surfaces: An In Vitro Comparative Study
    Mounika, Kalluri Lakshmi
    Lanke, Rama Brahmam
    Mudaliyar, Manasi Chinnadurai
    Khandelwal, Sourabh
    Gaddam, Bhavyasri
    Boyapati, Ramanarayana
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (05)
  • [4] Dental implant surfaces after insertion in bone: an in vitro study in four commercial implant systems
    Deppe, Herbert
    Wolff, Carolina
    Bauer, Florian
    Ruthenberg, Ricarda
    Sculean, Anton
    Muecke, Thomas
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (03) : 1593 - 1600
  • [5] Bone Response to Two Dental Implants with Different Sandblasted/Acid-Etched Implant Surfaces: A Histological and Histomorphometrical Study in Rabbits
    Scarano, Antonio
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Quaranta, Alesandro
    Lorusso, Felice
    BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 2017
  • [6] Atomic force microscopy analysis of different surface treatments of Ti dental implant surfaces
    Bathomarco, RV
    Solorzano, G
    Elias, CN
    Prioli, R
    APPLIED SURFACE SCIENCE, 2004, 233 (1-4) : 29 - 34
  • [7] Impact of Smoking on Human Bone Apposition at Different Dental Implant Surfaces: A Histologic Study in Type IV Bone
    d'Avila, Susana
    dos Reis, Leonardo Delfino
    Piattelli, Adriano
    Aguiar, Kelly C. S.
    de Faveri, Marcelo
    Borges, Fabio L.
    Iezzi, Giovanna
    Oliveira, Nilson T. C.
    Cardoso, Luciana Ap de G.
    Shibli, Jamil Awad
    JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2010, 36 (02) : 85 - 90
  • [8] Analysis of percussion response of dental implants: An in vitro study
    Dinh, Andrew
    Sheets, Cherilyn G.
    Earthman, James C.
    MATERIALS SCIENCE & ENGINEERING C-MATERIALS FOR BIOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2013, 33 (05): : 2657 - 2663
  • [9] The biological response to three different nanostructures applied on smooth implant surfaces
    Jimbo, Ryo
    Sotres, Javier
    Johansson, Carina
    Breding, Karin
    Currie, Fredrik
    Wennerberg, Ann
    CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (06) : 706 - 712
  • [10] Bacterial and Cellular Response to Yellow-Shaded Surface Modifications for Dental Implant Abutments
    Genova, Tullio
    Chinigo, Giorgia
    Munaron, Luca
    Rivolo, Paola
    Luganini, Anna
    Gribaudo, Giorgio
    Cavagnetto, Davide
    Mandracci, Pietro
    Mussano, Federico
    BIOMOLECULES, 2022, 12 (11)