Public acceptance of microbiome management strategy in dairy calves: a European survey on colostrum, probiotic provision and prolonged cow-calf contact

被引:0
作者
Sidhoum, A. Ait [1 ]
Stygar, A. [1 ]
Bedoin, F. [2 ]
Niemi, J. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Nat Resources Inst Finland Luke, Business Econ, Latokartanonkaari 9, FI-00790 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Inst Elevage, Paris, France
关键词
Animal health; Beneficial bacteria; Citizen survey; Gut flora; Public approval; CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE; ATTITUDES; PERCEPTIONS; PERFORMANCE; PREFERENCE; SEPARATION; CLIMATE; WELFARE; MODEL; MILK;
D O I
10.1016/j.animal.2024.101380
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The microbiome plays a crucial role in the calves' early stages of life. Several management practices can be considered to enhance the development and composition of the microbiome in calves. However, their social acceptance is largely unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the public acceptance of innovative microbiome management practices aimed at improving the health and welfare of calves and to assess the factors influencing these levels of acceptance. Data used in the analysis were obtained from an online survey conducted in July 2023. The final sample consists of 3 220 citizens from four EU countries (Finland = 813, France = 803, Ireland = 801 and Poland = 803). Participants were asked to assess four management practices designed to improve calves' health and welfare: (1) using colostrum, (2) providing mix probiotics powder, (3) providing probiotics as yogurt or kefir and (4) prolonged cow-calf contact. Participants were provided with different levels of information: one group received only a short description of the intervention, while the other group received both the intervention description and information on aspects such as potential costs and environmental impact of the intervention. Participants were asked to rate the acceptance on a standardised scale ranging from 1 to 5, with 1 indicating "strongly agree" and 5 indicating "strongly disagree". Additionally, the participants were questioned about their socio-demographic background (e.g. age, education). They were also asked to provide their perspectives on various dimensions concerning familiarity with farming and microbiome, food safety, environmental awareness, cost consideration, and cultural perspective of consuming dairy products. Obtained data were analysed using the ordinary least squares regression model. The findings reveal that prolonged cow-calf contact was the most acceptable measure among tested interventions in all countries (79% of responders agreed or strongly agreed). Attitudinal and socio-economic variables were found to have a differential effect across the studied management strategies. For instance, individuals with greater familiarity with farming systems and microbiomes were more inclined to accept all four interventions, while women, compared to men, showed higher acceptance of prolonged cow-calf contact. Results also indicate that the provision of additional information to the participants was associated with a decrease in the acceptance of the measures. In conclusion, the public's perceptions regarding microbiome management strategies in dairy calves are shaped by complex factors. Also, our discussion emphasises the importance of clarity and transparency of messages, ethical dissemination of scientific knowledge, and the necessity for balanced and coherent communication. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of The Animal Consortium. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 79 条
[31]   Citizens' views on the practices of zero-grazing and cow-calf separation in the dairy industry: Does providing information increase acceptability? [J].
Hoetzel, Maria J. ;
Cardoso, Clarissa S. ;
Roslindo, Angelica ;
von Keyserlingk, Marina A. G. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2017, 100 (05) :4150-4160
[32]   Are farmers in England equipped to meet the knowledge challenge of sustainable soil management? An analysis of farmer and advisor views [J].
Ingram, Julie .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2008, 86 (01) :214-228
[33]  
International Organization for Standardization, 2019, ISO Standard No. 20252:2019)
[34]  
Joshi A., 2015, Br. J. Appl. Sci. Technol., V7, P396, DOI [DOI 10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975, 10.9734/"BJAST/2015/14975, 10.9734/bjast/2015/14975]
[35]   Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States [J].
Kellstedt, Paul M. ;
Zahran, Sammy ;
Vedlitz, Arnold .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2008, 28 (01) :113-126
[36]   Public concern with animal well-being: Place, social structural location, and individual experience [J].
Kendall, Holli A. ;
Lobao, Linda M. ;
Sharp, Jeff S. .
RURAL SOCIOLOGY, 2006, 71 (03) :399-428
[37]   Attitudes towards animal use and belief in animal mind [J].
Knight, S ;
Vrij, A ;
Cherryman, V ;
Nunkoosing, K .
ANTHROZOOS, 2004, 17 (01) :43-62
[38]   Invited review: The importance of colostrum in the newborn dairy calf [J].
Lopez, A. J. ;
Heinrichs, A. J. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2022, 105 (04) :2733-2749
[39]   Understanding host-microbial interactions in rumen: searching the best opportunity for microbiota manipulation [J].
Malmuthuge, Nilusha ;
Guan, Le Luo .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2017, 8
[40]  
Markets and Markets, 2024, WWW Document