Enhancing passenger-vehicle interaction through multimodal explanation for unexpected behaviors of fully autonomous driving in non-driving-related tasks

被引:0
作者
Hong, Jeonguk [1 ,3 ]
Kim, Sangyeon [2 ,4 ]
Lee, Sangwon [1 ]
机构
[1] Korea Univ, Dept Ind & Management Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sookmyung Womens Univ, Div Artificial Intelligence Engn, Seoul, South Korea
[3] 214 New Engn Bldg,145 Anam Ro, Seoul 02841, South Korea
[4] 515 Suryeon Fac Bldg,Cheongpa Ro 47 Gil 100, Seoul 04310, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Unexpected behavior of fully autonomous vehicles; Non-Driving-Related Tasks; Multimodal interface; Explainable artificial intelligence; User experience; TAKEOVER PERFORMANCE; USER EXPERIENCE; TRUST; ACCEPTANCE; QUALITY; DESIGN;
D O I
10.1016/j.trf.2025.01.045
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
This study investigates the effects of multimodal explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) interfaces on passenger experience during unexpected behaviors of fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs) when engaging in non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs). An experiment was conducted with 70 participants using a driving simulator. The experiment was designed as a 2 (performing NDRT or not) x 2 (textual explanation or none) x 2 (speech explanation with sound or sound only) between-subject design, focusing on user experience (UX), explanation satisfaction, situation awareness, and trust regarding multimodal XAI interfaces. We included eight unexpected driving situations (i.e., weather type, traffic condition, etc.) that were required as unusual and strange. The findings showed an interaction effect between NDRTs and speech explanations for pragmatic and hedonic qualities of UX. When passengers were in NDRTs, the effectiveness of multimodal XAI interfaces was worse than presenting no explanation at all. When passengers were not in NDRTs, multimodal XAI interfaces improved the overall qualities of UX. Single modality explanations also had a positive effect compared to none, with auditory speech explanations superior to visual ones. These findings have practical implications for supporting effective passenger-vehicle interaction systems that cater to varying user contexts. Specifically, this study demonstrates how well-crafted explanations can enhance trust, situation awareness, and user satisfaction, depending on NDRTs engagement. The results provide actionable insights for developing user-centered design guidelines for XAI interfaces, ensuring a positive UX in FAVs under dynamic and unexpected driving conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:1350 / 1364
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   Peeking Inside the Black-Box: A Survey on Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) [J].
Adadi, Amina ;
Berrada, Mohammed .
IEEE ACCESS, 2018, 6 :52138-52160
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Situation awareness analysis and measurement
[3]   Explainable Artificial Intelligence for Autonomous Driving: A Comprehensive Overview and Field Guide for Future Research Directions [J].
Atakishiyev, Shahin ;
Salameh, Mohammad ;
Yao, Hengshuai ;
Goebel, Randy .
IEEE ACCESS, 2024, 12 :101603-101625
[4]   Investigating explanations in conditional and highly automated driving: The effects of situation awareness and modality [J].
Avetisyan, Lilit ;
Ayoub, Jackie ;
Zhou, Feng .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2022, 89 :456-466
[5]   Take-over requests in highly automated driving: A crowdsourcing survey on auditory, vibrotactile, and visual displays [J].
Bazilinskyy, P. ;
Petermeijer, S. M. ;
Petrovych, V. ;
Dodou, D. ;
de Winter, J. C. F. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2018, 56 :82-98
[6]   Auditory interfaces in automated driving: An international survey [J].
Bazilinskyy, Pavlo ;
deWinter, Joost .
PeerJ Computer Science, 2015, 2015 (08)
[7]   Control Task Substitution in Semiautomated Driving: Does It Matter What Aspects Are Automated? [J].
Carsten, Oliver ;
Lai, Frank C. H. ;
Barnard, Yvonne ;
Jamson, A. Hamish ;
Merat, Natasha .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2012, 54 (05) :747-761
[8]  
Ching-Yao Chan, 2017, International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, V6, P208, DOI 10.1016/j.ijtst.2017.07.008
[9]   USER ACCEPTANCE OF COMPUTER-TECHNOLOGY - A COMPARISON OF 2 THEORETICAL-MODELS [J].
DAVIS, FD ;
BAGOZZI, RP ;
WARSHAW, PR .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 1989, 35 (08) :982-1003