Model Bias Identification for Bayesian Calibration of Stochastic Digital Twins of Bridges

被引:0
作者
Arcones, Daniel Andres [1 ]
Weiser, Martin [2 ]
Koutsourelakis, Phaedon-Stelios [3 ]
Unger, Joerg F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Bundesanstalt Mat Forsch & Prufung, Dept Modeling & Simulat 7 7, Berlin, Germany
[2] Zuse Inst Berlin, Modeling & Simulat Complex Proc, Berlin, Germany
[3] Tech Univ Munich, Professorship Data Driven Mat Modeling, Garching, Germany
关键词
Bayesian updating; digital twins; model bias; uncertainty quantification; IMPROVEMENT;
D O I
10.1002/asmb.2897
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; O22 [运筹学];
学科分类号
070105 ; 12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Simulation-based digital twins must provide accurate, robust, and reliable digital representations of their physical counterparts. Therefore, quantifying the uncertainty in their predictions plays a key role in making better-informed decisions that impact the actual system. The update of the simulation model based on data must then be carefully implemented. When applied to complex structures such as bridges, discrepancies between the computational model and the real system appear as model bias, which hinders the trustworthiness of the digital twin and increases its uncertainty. Classical Bayesian updating approaches aimed at inferring the model parameters often fail to compensate for such model bias, leading to overconfident and unreliable predictions. In this paper, two alternative model bias identification approaches are evaluated in the context of their applicability to digital twins of bridges. A modularized version of Kennedy and O'Hagan's approach and another one based on Orthogonal Gaussian Processes are compared with the classical Bayesian inference framework in a set of representative benchmarks. Additionally, two novel extensions are proposed for these models: the inclusion of noise-aware kernels and the introduction of additional variables not present in the computational model through the bias term. The integration of these approaches into the digital twin corrects the predictions, quantifies their uncertainty, estimates noise from unknown physical sources of error, and provides further insight into the system by including additional pre-existing information without modifying the computational model.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Monte Carlo Strategies in Scientific Computing
[2]   A Bayesian Framework for Simulation-based Digital Twins of Bridges [J].
Arcones, Daniel Andres ;
Weiser, Martin ;
Koutsourelakis, Faidon-Stelios ;
Unger, Joerg F. .
EUROPEAN ASSOCIATION ON QUALITY CONTROL OF BRIDGES AND STRUCTURES, EUROSTRUCT 2023, VOL 6, ISS 5, 2023, :734-740
[3]   Quantification of Model Uncertainty: Calibration, Model Discrepancy, and Identifiability [J].
Arendt, Paul D. ;
Apley, Daniel W. ;
Chen, Wei .
JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL DESIGN, 2012, 134 (10)
[4]   Analyzing Stochastic Computer Models: A Review with Opportunities [J].
Baker, Evan ;
Barbillon, Pierre ;
Fadikar, Arindam ;
Gramacy, Robert B. ;
Herbei, Radu ;
Higdon, David ;
Huang, Jiangeng ;
Johnson, Leah R. ;
Ma, Pulong ;
Mondal, Anirban ;
Pires, Bianica ;
Sacks, Jerome ;
Sokolov, Vadim .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2022, 37 (01) :64-89
[5]  
BAM, 2023, PRO
[6]  
Barbillon P., 2023, COURS COLE CHERCHEUR
[7]   Deterministic and probabilistic-based model updating of aging steel bridges [J].
Barros, B. ;
Conde, B. ;
Cabaleiro, M. ;
Riveiro, B. .
STRUCTURES, 2023, 54 :89-105
[8]   Practical Heteroscedastic Gaussian Process Modeling for Large Simulation Experiments [J].
Binois, Mickael ;
Gramacy, Robert B. ;
Ludkovski, Mike .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL AND GRAPHICAL STATISTICS, 2018, 27 (04) :808-821
[9]   Learning about physical parameters: the importance of model discrepancy [J].
Brynjarsdottir, Jenny ;
O'Hagan, Anthony .
INVERSE PROBLEMS, 2014, 30 (11)
[10]  
Camana F., 2019, GEOSTATISTICS LESSON