Role of CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as prognostic and predictive markers in locally advanced and metastatic gastric carcinoma

被引:0
|
作者
Gopal, Vishnu [1 ]
Nisha, Yadav [1 ]
Ganesan, Prasanth [1 ]
Kayal, Smita [1 ]
Bobby, Zachariah [2 ]
Adithan, Subathra [3 ]
Penumadu, Prasanth [4 ]
Ramakrishnalay, Vishnu P. [5 ]
Bandlamudi, Bhanu P. [1 ]
Bahttacharjee, Arnab [1 ]
Dahagama, Sindhu [1 ]
Dubashi, Biswajit [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Med Oncol, Pondicherry, India
[2] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Biochem, Pondicherry, India
[3] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Radiodiag, Pondicherry, India
[4] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Surg Oncol, Pondicherry, India
[5] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Surg, Pondicherry, India
关键词
CEA; CYFRA; 21-1; gastric cancer; tumor markers; PREOPERATIVE CARCINOEMBRYONIC ANTIGEN; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; CLINICAL-SIGNIFICANCE; TUMOR-MARKERS; CA; 72-4; SERUM; CANCER; CT;
D O I
10.4103/jcrt.jcrt_746_22
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose:Tumor-associated serum markers have demonstrated predictive and prognostic value in patients being treated for malignancies. However, the clinical importance of tumor markers in gastric cancers (GC) is poorly standardized.Objectives:The objective is to assess the clinical utility of cytokeratin-19 fragment (CYFRA 21-1) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) as serum tumor markers in advanced GC.Methods:In this prospective study, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels were measured at baseline and after three cycles of chemotherapy in patients with advanced GC. The association of tumor marker levels with prognosis and decline of tumor markers with radiological overall response rates (ORR) and survival were analyzed.Results:In the 105 patients, the proportion of patients with elevated baseline CYFRA 21-1 and CEA levels was 55% (N = 58) and 37% (N = 39) based on predefined cutoffs. Response assessment was done for 61 patients who received a minimum of three cycles of chemotherapy. A 15% and 13% reduction of serum levels from baseline for CYFRA 21-1 and CEA were selected for defining "CYFRA 21-1 response" and "CEA-response," respectively. Both responses were significant predictors of radiological ORR. The median overall survival (OS) was 9.6 months in the entire cohort and 13 months for patients who received at least three cycles of chemotherapy. In multivariate analysis, baseline CEA levels and ECOG status were significant predictors of OS. In a subset analysis of patients receiving palliative chemotherapy, any of the tumor marker responses predicted improved 1-year OS.Conclusion:In advanced GC, CYFRA 21-1 and CEA decline from baseline appeared to be reliable surrogate markers of chemotherapy efficacy and improved survival.
引用
收藏
页码:1412 / 1419
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predictive Role of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in Patients with Advanced-stage NSCLC Treated with Erlotinib
    Fiala, Ondrej
    Pesek, Milos
    Finek, Jindrich
    Benesova, Lucie
    Minarik, Marek
    Bortlicek, Zbynek
    Topolcan, Ondrej
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2014, 34 (06) : 3205 - 3210
  • [2] Diagnostic value of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 tumor markers in primary lung cancer
    Okamura, Kyoko
    Takayama, Koichi
    Izumi, Miiru
    Harada, Taishi
    Furuyama, Kazuto
    Nakanishi, Yoichi
    LUNG CANCER, 2013, 80 (01) : 45 - 49
  • [3] Clinical Usefulness of CEA, CA19-9, and CYFRA 21-1 as Tumor Markers for Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma
    Washino, Satoshi
    Hirai, Masaru
    Matsuzaki, Atsushi
    Kobayashi, Yutaka
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2011, 87 (04) : 420 - 426
  • [4] The Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Tumor Markers (CEA, SCC, CYFRA 21-1, TPS) in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
    Barak, Vivian
    Meirovitz, Amichay
    Leibovici, Vera
    Rachmut, Jacob
    Peretz, Tamar
    Eliashar, Ron
    Gross, Menachem
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 35 (10) : 5519 - 5524
  • [5] CEA and CYFRA 21-1 as prognostic biomarker and as a tool for treatment monitoring in advanced NSCLC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
    Dall'Olio, Filippo G.
    Abbati, Francesca
    Facchinetti, Francesco
    Massucci, Maria
    Melotti, Barbara
    Squadrilli, Anna
    Buti, Sebastiano
    Formica, Francesca
    Tiseo, Marcello
    Ardizzoni, Andrea
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN MEDICAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [6] Preoperative CYFRA 21-1 and CEA as Prognostic Factors in Patients with Stage I Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
    Blankenburg, Florian
    Hatz, Rudolf
    Nagel, Dorothea
    Ankerst, Donna
    Reinmiedl, Judith
    Gruber, Christine
    Seidel, Dietrich
    Stieber, Petra
    TUMOR BIOLOGY, 2008, 29 (04) : 272 - 277
  • [7] Prognostic impact of serum CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study
    Ono, Akira
    Takahashi, Toshiaki
    Mori, Keita
    Akamatsu, Hiroaki
    Shukuya, Takehito
    Taira, Tetsuhiko
    Kenmotsu, Hirotsugu
    Naito, Tateaki
    Murakami, Haruyasu
    Nakajima, Takashi
    Endo, Masahiro
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    BMC CANCER, 2013, 13
  • [8] Cyfra 21-1 marker in carcinoma of the cervix
    Yazigi, R
    Castillo, R
    Aliste, G
    Garrido, J
    Opazo, A
    Prado, S
    Navarro, C
    Altieri, E
    Del Campo, G
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2000, 10 (03) : 203 - 206
  • [9] Increased CYFRA 21-1, CEA and NSE are Prognostic of Poor Outcome for Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Lung: A Nomogram and Recursive Partitioning Risk Stratification Analysis
    Wang, Jingbo
    Jiang, Wei
    Zhang, Tao
    Liu, Lipin
    Bi, Nan
    Wang, Xiaozhen
    Hui, Zhouguang
    Liang, Jun
    Lv, Jima
    Zhou, Zongmei
    Xiao, Zefen
    Feng, Qinfu
    Chen, Dongfu
    Yin, Weibo
    Wang, Luhua
    TRANSLATIONAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 11 (04): : 999 - 1006
  • [10] The diagnostic value of CYFRA 21-1 in oral squamous cell carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Liang, Yuting
    Yi, Zhenke
    Li, Jiajin
    Ye, Jufeng
    EXPERT REVIEW OF ANTICANCER THERAPY, 2024, 24 (11) : 1161 - 1168