Evaluating diversity in neurosurgery through the use of a multidimensional statistical model: a pilot study

被引:11
作者
Borden, Jonathan H. [1 ]
Mahajan, Uma V. [2 ]
Eyasu, Lud [3 ]
Holden, William [3 ]
Shaw, Brian [3 ]
Callas, Peter [4 ]
Benzil, Deborah L. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Vermont, Dept Psychiat, Burlington, VT USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[3] Univ Vermont, Larner Coll Med, Burlington, VT USA
[4] Univ Vermont, Dept Biostat, Burlington, VT USA
[5] Cleveland Clin, Dept Neurosurg, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
neurosurgery; residency; diversity; education; equality;
D O I
10.3171/2021.10.JNS211006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating the benefits of diversity across many domains. However, neurosurgery consistently lags most of medicine in many aspects of diversity. Any inability to make progress in this arena is likely due to the multifactorial and complex nature of the issue, which makes it difficult to meaningfully measure and track diversity within the workforce. The goal of this pilot study was to assess the utilization of a multidimensional statistical model to quantify and assess diversity within neurosurgery. The authors sought to 1) assess the diversity of neurosurgery residents using Simpson's Diversity Index and Sullivan's Composite Diversity Index (CDI) and 2) determine if a medical school's intrinsic academic opportunities and resources, indicated by US News & World Report's (USNWR's) best research medical schools ranking, are related to the number of neurosurgery residents produced per medical school. METHODS A cross-sectional study of all neurosurgery residents (projected graduation years 2020-2026) and 1st-year medical students (matriculating years 2016-2019) was undertaken. Biographical diversity data (gender and matriculation data) were collected from institutional websites between December 2019 and June 2020. The CDI expresses the diversity of a given population by representing the effective proportion of categories present across all diversity attributes and was calculated for neurosurgery residents and medical students. Statistical results are reported as the median and interquartile range. RESULTS Neurosurgery residency program CDI (0.21, IQR 0.16- 0.25) was significantly less (p < 0.001) than medical school CDI (0.42, 0.37- 0.48). There was no significant difference in CDI between top- 40 and non-top 40 Doximity ranked research output neurosurgery residency programs (p = 0.35) or between top-40 and non- top 40 USNWR ranked research medical schools (p = 0.11). Over a 7-year period, top-40 ranked research medical schools produced significantly more (p < 0.001) neurosurgery residents (11.9, IQR 7.1-18.9) than the non-top 40 ranked research medical schools (5.6, IQR 2.6-8.5). CONCLUSIONS The authors demonstrated the feasibility of using a multidimensional statistical model as a measure to understand the complex issues of diversity. Their preliminary data suggested that neurosurgery's challenge in achieving the desired diversity relates to uneven attraction and/or recruitment across an increasingly diverse medical student body. In recent years, neurosurgery has made great progress in the arena of diversity and has shown a strong desire to do more. Utilization of these diversity measures will help the neurosurgery field to monitor progress along this valuable journey.
引用
收藏
页码:859 / 866
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Charting Outcomes in the Match, 2011
[2]  
[Anonymous], MUA Find
[3]  
[Anonymous], Definition for diversity
[4]  
Association of American Medical Colleges, Report on residents
[5]  
Association of American Medical Colleges, Table B3: Number of active residents, by type of medical school, GME specialty, and gender: 2022-2023 active residents
[6]   The future of neurosurgery: a white paper on the recruitment and retention of women in neurosurgery [J].
Benzil, Deborah L. ;
Abosch, Aviva ;
Germano, Isabelle ;
Gilmer, Holly ;
Maraire, J. Nozipo ;
Muraszko, Karin ;
Pannullo, Susan ;
Rosseau, Gail ;
Schwartz, Lauren ;
Todor, Roxanne ;
Ullmanm, Jamie ;
Zusman, Edie .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2008, 109 (03) :378-386
[7]   Gender-Heterogeneous Working Groups Produce Higher Quality Science [J].
Campbell, Lesley G. ;
Mehtani, Siya ;
Dozier, Mary E. ;
Rinehart, Janice .
PLOS ONE, 2013, 8 (10)
[8]   Consequences of changing biodiversity [J].
Chapin, FS ;
Zavaleta, ES ;
Eviner, VT ;
Naylor, RL ;
Vitousek, PM ;
Reynolds, HL ;
Hooper, DU ;
Lavorel, S ;
Sala, OE ;
Hobbie, SE ;
Mack, MC ;
Diaz, S .
NATURE, 2000, 405 (6783) :234-242
[9]   The case for diversity in the health care workforce [J].
Cohen, JJ ;
Gabriel, BA ;
Terrell, C .
HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2002, 21 (05) :90-102
[10]   Racial Diversity Matters: The Impact of Diversity-Related Student Engagement and Institutional Context [J].
Denson, Nida ;
Chang, Mitchell J. .
AMERICAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2009, 46 (02) :322-353