A comparison of surgical outcomes between outpatient and inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Nguyen, Tuan T. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Hammad, Muhammed A. Moukhtar [1 ]
Dobbs, Ryan W. [4 ]
Vuong, Huy G. [5 ]
Basilius, Jacob [1 ]
Quy, Khoa [2 ]
Ngo, Hanh T. T. [2 ]
Nguyen, An [2 ]
Tran, Thi Tuyet Mai [2 ]
Khanmammadova, Narmina
Van, Trinh N. K. [2 ]
Ali, Sohrab N. [1 ]
Tiong, Ho Yee [6 ]
Choi, Se Young [7 ]
Shahait, Mohammed [8 ]
Lee, David, I [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Urol, 3800 W Chapman Ave,Suite 7200, Orange, CA 92868 USA
[2] Univ Med & Pharm Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[3] Cho Ray Hosp, Dept Urol, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
[4] Cook Cty Hlth & Hosp Syst, Chicago, IL USA
[5] Oklahoma Univ, Hlth Sci Ctr, Oklahoma City, OK USA
[6] Natl Univ Singapore Hosp, Singapore, Singapore
[7] Chung Ang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Urol, Chung Ang Univ Hosp, Seoul, South Korea
[8] Clemenceau Med Ctr, Surg Dept, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Robotic surgery; SAME-DAY DISCHARGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.prnil.2024.04.003
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Several institutions have reported their experience with outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (O-RARP). However, it is unclear if the utilization of this approach represents an improvement over inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (I-RARP). This meta-analysis sought to compare the surgical outcomes between O-RARP and I-RARP. Methods: For relevant articles, three electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched from their inception until April 30, 2022. A meta-analysis has been reported in line with PRISMA 2020 and AMSTAR guidelines. The risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (MD) were applied for the comparison of dichotomous and continuous variables with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: of the 297 retrieved abstracts, 12 underwent full-text review, and 11 studies were included in the final analysis, comprising a total cohort of 2,875 cases of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (892 ORARP cases and 1,983 I-RARP cases). Compared to I-RARP, the O-RARP group had lower mean operative time (MD = -9.4 minutes, 95% CI -15.1 to -3.7, P = 0.001), fewer overall postoperative complications (RR = 0.65, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.92, P = 0.017), shorter hospital stay (MD = -22.9 hours, 95% CI -26.0 to -19.7, P < 0.001), and lower postoperative opioid requirements (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in other outcomes, including: estimated blood loss, postoperative pain score, unscheduled visits after surgery, positive surgical margins, biochemical recurrence, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) after surgery, or three- and six-month continence rates. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrates that O-RARP is a safe and feasible option for patients undergoing surgery for localized prostate cancer. Further studies are needed to better evaluate optimal patient selection, associated healthcare costs, and patient-reported outcomes. (c) 2025 The Asian Pacific Prostate Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 9
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhongyu Jian
    Shijian Feng
    Yuntian Chen
    Xin Wei
    Deyi Luo
    Hong Li
    Kunjie Wang
    BMC Urology, 18
  • [42] Suprapubic tube versus urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Jian, Zhongyu
    Feng, Shijian
    Chen, Yuntian
    Wei, Xin
    Luo, Deyi
    Li, Hong
    Wang, Kunjie
    BMC UROLOGY, 2018, 18 : 1
  • [43] Suprapubic tube compared with urethral catheter drainage after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Li, Mei-Xuan
    Cheng, Peng
    Yao, Liang
    Li, Hui-Juan
    Xun, Yang-Qin
    Yan, Pei-Jing
    Han, Cai-Wen
    Lu, Cun-Cun
    He, Wen-Bo
    Wang, Meng
    Liu, Rong
    Guo, Tian-Kang
    Yang, Ke-Hu
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2019, 42 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [44] Role of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane in enhancing functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yang, Yun-Jung
    Kim, Taehyen
    Yang, Eun-Jung
    Choi, Se Young
    JOURNAL OF SEXUAL MEDICINE, 2025,
  • [45] Comparison of accuracy, revision, and perioperative outcomes in robot-assisted spine surgeries: systematic review and meta-analysis
    MacLean, Luke
    Hersh, Andrew M.
    Bhimreddy, Meghana
    Jiang, Kelly
    Davidar, A. Daniel
    Weber-Levine, Carly
    Alomari, Safwan
    Judy, Brendan F.
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Theodore, Nicholas
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE, 2024, 41 (04) : 519 - 531
  • [46] Perioperative mortality and morbidity of outpatient versus inpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: A propensity matched analysis
    Khalil, Mahmoud, I
    Bhandari, Naleen Raj
    Payakachat, Nalin
    Davis, Rodney
    Raheem, Omer A.
    Kamel, Mohamed H.
    UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2020, 38 (01) : 3.e1 - 3.e6
  • [47] What is new in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: a narrative review
    Martini, Alberto
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Briganti, Alberto
    CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 14 - 18
  • [48] Outcomes after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy
    Murphy, Declan G.
    Challacombe, Benjamin J.
    Costello, Anthony J.
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2009, 11 (01) : 94 - 99
  • [49] Safety and feasibility of outpatient robot-assisted radical prostatectomy
    Banapour, Pooya
    Elliott, Peter
    Jabaji, Ramzi
    Parekh, Ashish
    Pathak, Apurba
    Merchant, Madhur
    Tamaddon, Kirk
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2019, 13 (02) : 261 - 265
  • [50] Retzius Sparing Radical Prostatectomy Versus Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Which Technique Is More Beneficial for Prostate Cancer Patients (MASTER Study)? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Barak, Bara
    Othman, Hazem
    Gauger, Ulrich
    Wolff, Ingmar
    Hadaschik, Boris
    Rehme, Christian
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2022, 8 (04): : 1060 - 1071