Robotic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a comparative study on surgical safety and functional outcomes

被引:1
作者
Li, Tengteng [1 ]
Fu, Haixiao [1 ]
Wei, Fu [1 ]
Xuan, Zhang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xuzhou Med Univ, Dept Gen Surg, Affiliated Hosp, 99 Huaihai West Rd, Xuzhou, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
comparative study; functional outcomes; laparoscopic surgery; rectal cancer; robotic surgery; surgical safety; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; PRESERVATION; RESECTION; RISK;
D O I
10.1111/ans.19302
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Backgrounds: This study aims to evaluate the clinical efficacy and functional outcomes of DA Vinci (Xi)-assisted surgery compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery for middle and low rectal cancer, focusing on oncologic cure and functional preservation. Methods: Between December 2020 and June 2021, 102 patients with middle and low rectal cancer (tumour lower margin <= 10 cm) were enrolled at the affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University. Participants were divided into two groups: robot-assisted (n = 51) and laparoscopy-assisted (n = 51). Each group underwent a radical resection using their assigned method. Clinical and functional outcomes were analysed post-surgery. Results: Preoperative data did not differ significantly between groups (P > 0.05). All surgeries were successfully completed without conversion to open surgery. The robotic group experienced significantly less intraoperative blood loss (55.2 +/- 29.8 mL vs. 109.5 +/- 58.5 mL) and faster recovery in gastrointestinal function (35.1 +/- 9.4 h vs. 40.7 +/- 1.9 h), diet recovery (2.1 +/- 0.8 days vs. 2.9 +/- 0.4 days), and catheter removal (2.9 +/- 2.7 days vs. 5.3 +/- 2.1 days). The robotic group also dissected more lymph nodes (23 +/- 6 vs. 15 +/- 4). However, they had longer operative times (239.8 +/- 29.6 min vs. 141.1 +/- 18.5 min) and higher hospital costs. Satisfaction levels regarding defecation, voiding, and sexual functions were notably higher in the robotic group. Conclusion: No significant differences in surgical safety or immediate postoperative outcomes were observed between robotic and laparoscopic approaches. However, robotic surgery demonstrated superior lymph node dissection, anal function preservation, and gastrointestinal recovery, enhancing overall functional outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:156 / 162
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Robotic and laparoscopic sphincter-saving resections have similar peri-operative, oncological and functional outcomes in female patients with rectal cancer [J].
Aliyev, Vusal ;
Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo ;
Shadmanov, Niyaz ;
Guven, Koray ;
Bakir, Baris ;
Goksel, Suha ;
Asoglu, Oktar .
UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2023, 75 (8) :2201-2209
[2]   Robotic male and laparoscopic female sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision of mid-low rectal cancer share similar specimen quality, complication rates and long-term oncological outcomes [J].
Aliyev, Vusal ;
Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo ;
Huseynov, Elnur ;
Mustafayev, Teuta Zoto ;
Kayku, Vildan ;
Goksel, Suha ;
Asoglu, Oktar .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2023, 17 (04) :1637-1644
[3]   Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional outcomes [J].
Aliyev, Vusal ;
Piozzi, Guglielmo Niccolo ;
Bulut, Alisina ;
Guven, Koray ;
Bakir, Baris ;
Saglam, Sezer ;
Goksel, Suha ;
Asoglu, Oktar .
UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2022, 74 (06) :1851-1860
[4]   Is robotic da Vinci Xi® superior to the da Vinci Si® for sphincter-preserving total mesorectal excision? Outcomes in 150 mid-low rectal cancer patients [J].
Aliyev, Vusal ;
Arslan, Naciye Cigdem ;
Goksoy, Beslen ;
Guven, Koray ;
Goksel, Suha ;
Asoglu, Oktar .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 16 (06) :1339-1346
[5]  
Aliyev Vusal, 2021, Surg Technol Int, V39, P166, DOI 10.52198/21.STI.39.CR1460
[6]  
Aliyev V, 2021, SURG TECHNOL INT, V38
[7]  
Aliyev V, 2020, SURG TECHNOL INT, V37
[8]   Robotic versus laparoscopic sphincter-saving total mesorectal excision for mid or low rectal cancer in male patients after neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy: comparison of long-term outcomes [J].
Asoglu, Oktar ;
Tokmak, Handan ;
Bakir, Baris ;
Aliyev, Vusal ;
Saglam, Sezer ;
Iscan, Yalin ;
Bademler, Suleyman ;
Meric, Serhat .
JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2020, 14 (03) :393-399
[9]   A Randomized Trial of Laparoscopic versus Open Surgery for Rectal Cancer [J].
Bonjer, H. Jaap ;
Deijen, Charlotte L. ;
Abis, Gabor A. ;
Cuesta, Miguel A. ;
van der Pas, Martijn H. G. M. ;
de lange-de Klerk, Elly S. M. ;
Lacy, Antonio M. ;
Bemelman, Willem A. ;
Andersson, John ;
Angenete, Eva ;
Rosenberg, Jacob ;
Fuerst, Alois ;
Haglind, Eva .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (14) :1324-1332
[10]   Total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer: Laparoscopic vs robotic surgery [J].
Feroci, Francesco ;
Vannucchi, Andrea ;
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro ;
Cantafio, Stefano ;
Garzi, Alessia ;
Formisano, Giampaolo ;
Scatizzi, Marco .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (13) :3602-3610