Evaluation of current and emerging endoluminal robotic platforms using the IDEAL framework

被引:0
|
作者
Shah, Diya [1 ]
Tesfai, Freweini Martha [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Boal, Matthew [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Arezzo, Alberto [6 ]
Francis, Nader [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Med Sch, London, England
[2] Northwick Pk & St Marks Hosp, Griffin Inst, London, England
[3] Univ Coll London UCL, EGA Inst Womens Hlth, London, England
[4] UCL, Wellcome EPSRC Ctr Intervent & Surg Sci WEISS, London, England
[5] Assoc Laparoscop Surg Great Britain & Ireland ALSG, London, England
[6] Univ Torino, Dept Surg Sci, Turin, Italy
[7] Somerset Fdn NHS Trust, Yeovil Dist Hosp, Taunton, England
关键词
Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems; IDEAL framework; minimally invasive surgery; evaluation; robotics; ENDOTICS SYSTEM; COLONOSCOPY; SURGERY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundRobotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.MethodsA scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected via virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.ResultsThe review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).ConclusionsThere is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] An Evaluation of Using a Game Development Framework in Higher Education
    Wu, Bian
    Wang, Alf Inge
    Strom, Jan-Erik
    Kvamme, Trond Blomholm
    22ND CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE ENGINEERING EDUCATION AND TRAINING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 41 - 44
  • [32] A Brain-Deformation Framework Based on a Linear Elastic Model and Evaluation Using Clinical Data
    Zhang, Chenxi
    Wang, Manning
    Song, Zhijian
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 58 (01) : 191 - 199
  • [33] Development of sentinel lymph node biopsy technique in patients with salivary gland cancer using the IDEAL framework
    Schilling, Clare
    Gnanasegaran, Gopinath
    Thavaraj, Selvam
    Vojnovic, Boris
    Ngu, Rose
    McGurk, Mark
    EJSO, 2020, 46 (11): : 2029 - 2034
  • [34] Comparative Evaluation of Major Robotic Systems in Microanastomosis Procedures: A Systematic Review of Current Capabilities and Future Potential
    Cannizzaro, Delia
    Scalise, Matteo
    Zancanella, Chiara
    Paulli, Stefano
    Peron, Stefano
    Stefini, Roberto
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2024, 14 (12)
  • [35] Robotic-assisted soft-tissue pelvic exenteration for primary and recurrent pelvic tumours: IDEAL stage 2a evaluation
    Fleming, Christina A.
    Harji, Deena
    Salut, Cecile
    Cauvin, Thomas
    Robert, Gregoire
    Denost, Quentin
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (08) : 923 - 926
  • [36] Evaluation of surgical laser optical feedback on uneven surfaces using robotic manipulator
    Smirnov, Dmitrii B.
    Melnichenko, Elena A.
    Bushuev, Semen, V
    Vorotnikov, Andrei A.
    Poduraev, Yuri, V
    ADVANCED LASER PROCESSING AND MANUFACTURING VI, 2022, 12312
  • [37] Comparison of perioperative outcomes and technical features using da Vinci Si and Xi robotic platforms for early stages of endometrial cancer
    Giannini, Andrea
    Malacarne, Elisa
    Sergiampietri, Claudia
    Mannella, Paolo
    Perutelli, Alessandra
    Cela, Vito
    Stomati, Massimo
    Melfi, Franca
    Simoncini, Tommaso
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2021, 15 (02) : 195 - 201
  • [38] Third-party evaluation of robotic hand designs using a mechanical glove
    Kanai, Takayuki
    Ohmura, Yoshiyuki
    Nagakubo, Akihiko
    Kuniyoshi, Yasuo
    arXiv, 2021,
  • [39] A planning and execution framework for robotic assembly with deformable objects using a centralized database based on the Rαβγ categorization
    Shneor, Ran
    Naveh, Gali
    Ben-David, Shir
    Shvarzman, Bar
    Mann, Zachi
    Greenberg, Alex
    Efrat, Yotam
    Einav, Omer
    Berman, Sigal
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2025,
  • [40] Principal Components Analysis Using Data Collected From Healthy Individuals on Two Robotic Assessment Platforms Yields Similar Behavioral Patterns
    Wood, Michael D.
    Simmatis, Leif E. R.
    Jacobson, Jill A.
    Dukelow, Sean P.
    Boyd, J. Gordon
    Scott, Stephen H.
    FRONTIERS IN HUMAN NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 15