Evaluation of current and emerging endoluminal robotic platforms using the IDEAL framework

被引:0
|
作者
Shah, Diya [1 ]
Tesfai, Freweini Martha [2 ,3 ,4 ]
Boal, Matthew [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Arezzo, Alberto [6 ]
Francis, Nader [2 ,7 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Med Sch, London, England
[2] Northwick Pk & St Marks Hosp, Griffin Inst, London, England
[3] Univ Coll London UCL, EGA Inst Womens Hlth, London, England
[4] UCL, Wellcome EPSRC Ctr Intervent & Surg Sci WEISS, London, England
[5] Assoc Laparoscop Surg Great Britain & Ireland ALSG, London, England
[6] Univ Torino, Dept Surg Sci, Turin, Italy
[7] Somerset Fdn NHS Trust, Yeovil Dist Hosp, Taunton, England
关键词
Robotic-assisted endoluminal systems; IDEAL framework; minimally invasive surgery; evaluation; robotics; ENDOTICS SYSTEM; COLONOSCOPY; SURGERY; DEVICE;
D O I
10.1080/13645706.2025.2467805
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundRobotic-assisted endoluminal systems are rapidly evolving within the field of minimally invasive surgery. The IDEAL framework (Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment, and Surveillance) can be used to evaluate novel technologies. This review provides a summary of current and emerging endoluminal systems using the IDEAL framework.MethodsA scoping review was conducted to include all existing and developing robotic-assisted endoluminal systems. Data was collected via virtual interviews, questionnaires, biomedical databases, company websites, and peer-reviewed articles. Key metrics were reported, enabling the assignment of each system to an IDEAL stage.ResultsThe review identified 17 distinct systems from 16 companies. Nine systems received regulatory approval in their respective countries. Our evaluation showed that two systems were at the pre-IDEAL Stage 0. Seven systems were in the Idea stage (Stage 1), six systems were in the Development stage (Stage 2) and two systems completed Stage 3. No system underwent long-term study evaluation (Stage 4).ConclusionsThere is a gap in long-term clinical data of robotic-assisted endoluminal systems, indicated by the absence of systems at Stage 4. Collaborative efforts amongst the medical community, regulatory bodies, and industry specialists are vital to ensure the delivery of evidence-based medicine in the discipline of robotics.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes Using the da Vinci S, Si, X, and Xi Robotic Platforms for BABA Robotic Thyroidectomy
    Shin, Hye Rim
    Lee, Keunchul
    Yu, Hyeong Won
    Kim, Su-jin
    Chai, Young Jun
    Choi, June Young
    Lee, Kyu Eun
    MEDICINA-LITHUANIA, 2021, 57 (10):
  • [12] No Surgical Innovation Without Evaluation Evolution and Further Development of the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations
    Hirst, Allison
    Philippou, Yiannis
    Blazeby, Jane
    Campbell, Bruce
    Campbell, Marion
    Feinberg, Joshua
    Rovers, Maroeska
    Blencowe, Natalie
    Pennell, Christopher
    Quinn, Tom
    Rogers, Wendy
    Cook, Jonathan
    Kolias, Angelos G.
    Agha, Riaz
    Dahm, Philipp
    Sedrakyan, Art
    McCulloch, Peter
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2019, 269 (02) : 211 - 220
  • [13] No frugal innovation without frugal evaluation: the Global IDEAL Sub-Framework
    Bolton, William S.
    Aruparayil, Noel K.
    Cundill, Bonnie
    McCulloch, Peter
    Gnanaraj, Jesudian
    Bundu, Ibrahim
    Culmer, Peter R.
    Brown, Julia M.
    Scott, Julian
    Jayne, David G.
    BMJ SURGERY INTERVENTIONS & HEALTH TECHNOLOGIES, 2024, 6 (01)
  • [14] Adapting the IDEAL Framework and Recommendations for medical device evaluation: A modified Delphi survey
    Pennell, Christopher P.
    Hirst, Allison
    Sedrakyan, Art
    McCulloch, Peter G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 28 : 141 - 148
  • [15] Off-Road Navigation Maps for Robotic Platforms using Convolutional Neural Networks
    Prinz, Raphael
    Bulbul, Rizwan
    Scholz, Joahnnes
    Eder, Matthias
    Steinbauer-Wagner, Gerald
    25TH AGILE CONFERENCE ON GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SCIENCE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE SERVICE OF GEOSPATIAL TECHNOLOGIES, 2022, 3
  • [16] Framework Design using the Robotic Augmented Reality for the CyberPhysical System
    Nguyen, Lam Phi
    Ngo, Ha Quang Thinh
    FME TRANSACTIONS, 2024, 52 (03): : 506 - 516
  • [17] Conceptualizing treatment of uncomplicated type B dissection using the IDEAL framework
    Wang, Grace J.
    Goodney, Philip P.
    Sedrakyan, Art
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (02) : 662 - 668
  • [18] R-IDEAL: A Framework for Systematic Clinical Evaluation of Technical Innovations in Radiation Oncology
    Verkooijen, Helena M.
    Kerkmeijer, Linda G. W.
    Fuller, Clifton D.
    Huddart, Robbert
    Faivre-Finn, Corinne
    Verheij, Marcel
    Mook, Stella
    Sahgal, Arjun
    Hall, Emma
    Schultz, Chris
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2017, 7
  • [19] The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring
    Marcus, Hani J.
    Ramirez, Pedro T.
    Khan, Danyal Z.
    Horsfall, Hugo Layard
    Hanrahan, John G.
    Williams, Simon C.
    Beard, David J.
    Bhat, Rani
    Catchpole, Ken
    Cook, Andrew
    Hutchison, Katrina
    Martin, Janet
    Melvin, Tom
    Stoyanov, Danail
    Rovers, Maroeska
    Raison, Nicholas
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Noonan, David
    Stocken, Deborah
    Sturt, Georgia
    Vanhoestenberghe, Anne
    Vasey, Baptiste
    McCulloch, Peter
    NATURE MEDICINE, 2024, 30 (1) : 61 - 75
  • [20] A Framework for Teaching Robotic Control Using a Novel Visual Programming Language
    Ghazal, Mohammed
    Haneefa, Fasila
    Ali, Samr
    Al Khalil, Yasmina
    Sweleh, Ahmed
    2016 IEEE 59TH INTERNATIONAL MIDWEST SYMPOSIUM ON CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS (MWSCAS), 2016, : 620 - 623