Comparative life cycle analysis of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles and battery electric vehicles: An Indian perspective

被引:1
作者
Shet, K. Harshendra N. [1 ,3 ]
Moholkar, Vijayanand S. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Indian Inst Technol Guwahati, Sch Energy Sci & Engn, Gauhati 781039, India
[2] Indian Inst Technol Guwahati, Dept Chem Engn, Gauhati 781039, India
[3] Manipal Acad Higher Educ, Manipal Inst Technol, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Manipal 576104, India
关键词
Global warming potential; Vehicle life cycle; Fuel life cycle; Sensitivity analysis; Blue hydrogen; Green hydrogen; GREENHOUSE-GAS; EMISSIONS; IMPACTS; HYBRID;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2025.01.254
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
India aims to decarbonize the transportation sector with 30% penetration of battery-electric vehicles (BEVs) in four-wheeler segment by 2030. Fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) using hydrogen could be alternate solution for achieving the target of GHG emission reduction. This work presents a comparative life cycle GHG emission analysis of FCEVs (for eight hydrogen production pathways) and BEVs (for 2023 and 2030 Indian electricity mix) using GREET model. The results revealed that FCEV powered with green hydrogen has the least emission of 105 gCO2/km. FCEV with blue hydrogen (CG + CS) has life cycle emissions of 141 gCO2/km, which is lesser than that of BEV for the present (185 gCO2/km) and also 2030 (141 gCO2/km) energy mix. Sensitivity analysis has revealed the impact of lifetime distance, fuel cell degradation, and battery replacement on lifecycle emissions. FCEVs can achieve sustainable transport with blue hydrogen for near future and green hydrogen for long run.
引用
收藏
页码:729 / 739
页数:11
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Dynamic simulation and lifecycle assessment of hydrogen fuel cell electric vehicles considering various hydrogen production methods [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Khoshnevisan, Alireza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2022, 47 (62) :26758-26769
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2023, Global CO2 emissions by sector, 2019-2022
[3]   Comparison between hydrogen and electric vehicles by life cycle assessment: A case study in Tuscany, Italy [J].
Bartolozzi, I. ;
Rizzi, F. ;
Frey, M. .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2013, 101 :103-111
[4]   Beyond conventional: Analysing the factors affecting the adoption of electric four-wheelers in an Indian metropolis [J].
Bhat, Furqan A. ;
Seth, Yash ;
Verma, Ashish .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART D-TRANSPORT AND ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 131
[5]   Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen, methanol and electric vehicles from well to wheel [J].
Bicer, Yusuf ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2017, 42 (06) :3767-3777
[6]   Total CO2-equivalent life-cycle emissions from commercially available passenger cars [J].
Buberger, Johannes ;
Kersten, Anton ;
Kuder, Manuel ;
Eckerle, Richard ;
Weyh, Thomas ;
Thiringer, Torbjoern .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2022, 159
[7]  
Burnham A., 2012, Updated Vehicle Specifications in the GREET Vehicle-Cycle Model
[8]   A systematic review of life cycle greenhouse gas intensity values for hydrogen production pathways [J].
Busch, P. ;
Kendall, A. ;
Lipman, T. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2023, 184
[9]   Novel short-term national strategies to promote the use of renewable hydrogen in road transport: A life cycle assessment of passenger car fleets partially fuelled with hydrogen [J].
Candelaresi, Daniele ;
Valente, Antonio ;
Iribarren, Diego ;
Dufour, Javier ;
Spazzafumo, Giuseppe .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2023, 859
[10]   Comparative life cycle assessment of hydrogen-fuelled passenger cars [J].
Candelaresi, Daniele ;
Valente, Antonio ;
Iribarren, Diego ;
Dufour, Javier ;
Spazzafumo, Giuseppe .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2021, 46 (72) :35961-35973