Gender-sensitive and intersectionality-informed health indicators for health reporting: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
|
作者
Gencer, Hande [1 ]
Sass, Anke-Christine [1 ]
Pruetz, Franziska [1 ]
机构
[1] Robert Koch Inst, Dept Epidemiol & Hlth Monitoring, Berlin, Germany
来源
BMJ OPEN | 2024年 / 14卷 / 11期
关键词
PUBLIC HEALTH; Methods; Health Equity; Review; SOCIAL MEDICINE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091549
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Gender is a well-established social determinant of health and health (in)equality. Gender-sensitive health indicators for health monitoring and health reporting can support gender mainstreaming in relevant policy areas and inform strategies to promote gender equality. They generally lack theoretical approaches to explain gender inequalities in health in the context of individual, social and structural circumstances. Gender-sensitive and intersectionality-informed health indicators provide a more accurate and nuanced picture of health outcomes and risks but are often lacking. The aim of this scoping review is to map the evidence on gender-sensitive and intersectionality-informed indicators for health reporting in order to support the development of an indicator set for German Federal Health Reporting.Methods and analysis This scoping review follows Arksey and O'Malley's methodological framework and its extension by Levac et al and will be reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We will conduct a database search complemented by a backward citation search using English search terms to find research articles and grey literature (eg, reports, policy/working papers, book chapters) reporting on gender-sensitive health indicators in the context of health reporting in the European Union-27 and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development published since 2014. Electronic databases include Medline, PsycINFO, Embase, Scopus, CINAHL and Cochrane Library. Other resources include targeted searches on websites relevant to national and international health reporting and a Google Search to include further eligible literature. After removing duplicates, two reviewers will independently screen all titles/abstracts and full texts for eligibility for inclusion and extract the data from included articles using a data extraction form. The results will be synthesised both narratively and descriptively and, where appropriate, presented in tables and graphs.Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is required for this study. Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publication, conference presentations and meetings with relevant stakeholders in health monitoring and reporting.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A systematic scoping review of adherence to reporting guidelines in health care literature
    Samaan, Zainab
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    Kosa, Daisy
    Debono, Victoria Borg
    Dillenburg, Rejane
    Zhang, Shiyuan
    Fruci, Vincent
    Dennis, Brittany
    Bawor, Monica
    Thabane, Lehana
    JOURNAL OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY HEALTHCARE, 2013, 6 : 169 - 188
  • [32] Public health approaches to substance use: a scoping review protocol
    Kosteniuk, Brynn
    Speed, Kelsey
    Candler, Ethan
    Campbell, Sandy
    Penney, Greg
    Moen, Karin
    Hyshka, Elaine
    JBI EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS, 2022, 20 (09) : 2395 - 2407
  • [33] Culturally Sensitive Health Education in the Caribbean Diaspora: A Scoping Review
    Hasan, Mashtura
    Singh, Harmandip
    Haffizulla, Farzanna
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (04) : 1 - 18
  • [34] Consequences of health condition labelling: protocol for a systematic scoping review
    Sims, Rebecca
    Kazda, Luise
    Michaleff, Zoe A.
    Glasziou, Paul
    Thomas, Rae
    BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (10):
  • [35] Mapping the scientific literature on obstetrical and perinatal health among sexual and gender minoritised (SGM) childbearing people and their infants: a scoping review protocol
    Huang, Aimee K.
    Soled, Kodiak Ray Sung
    Chen, Laura
    Schulte, Alison R.
    Hall, Mary-Frances E.
    McLaughlin, Claire
    Srinivasan, Sanjana
    Jahan, Aava B.
    Mita, Carol
    Charlton, Brittany M.
    BMJ OPEN, 2023, 13 (11):
  • [36] Use of infographics as a health-related knowledge translation tool: protocol for a scoping review
    Mc Sween-Cadieux, Esther
    Chabot, Catherine
    Fillol, Amandine
    Saha, Trisha
    Dagenais, Christian
    BMJ OPEN, 2021, 11 (06):
  • [37] Mapping the evidence on health equity considerations in economic evaluations of health interventions: a scoping review protocol
    Hafizah Besar Sa’aid
    Sharon Mathew
    Marina Richardson
    Joanna M. Bielecki
    Beate Sander
    Systematic Reviews, 9
  • [38] Visual Analytic Tools and Techniques in Population Health and Health Services Research: Protocol for a Scoping Review
    Chishtie, Jawad Ahmed
    Babineau, Jessica
    Bielska, Iwona Anna
    Cepoiu-Martin, Monica
    Irvine, Michael
    Koval, Andriy
    Marchand, Jean-Sebastien
    Turcotte, Luke
    Jeji, Tara
    Jaglal, Susan
    JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS, 2019, 8 (10):
  • [39] Use of social network analysis in health research: a scoping review protocol
    Grewal, Eshleen
    Godley, Jenny
    Wheeler, Justine
    Tang, Karen L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):
  • [40] Wildfire, deforestation and health in tropical rainforest areas: a scoping review protocol
    Casais, Gustavo
    Guimaraes, Nathalia Sernizon
    Cortes, Taisa Rodrigues
    Pescarini, Julia
    de Magalhaes, Poliana Reboucas
    Wells, Valerie
    de Sousa Filho, Jose Firmino
    Neves, Danielson Jorge Delgado
    Shimonovich, Michal
    Olsen, Jonathan R.
    Neto, Edgar Marcelino de Carvalho
    Cooper, Philip
    Katikireddi, Srinivasa Vittal
    Emanuel, Lucas
    Andrade, Roberto F. S.
    dos Santos, Gervasio Ferreira
    Barreto, Mauricio L.
    BMJ OPEN, 2024, 14 (05):