A systematic review on the effect of telehealth communication with intensive care unit families on patient and family outcomes

被引:0
作者
Cross, Claire [1 ]
Ozavci, Guncag [1 ,2 ]
Digby, Robin [1 ,2 ]
Bucknall, Tracey [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Deakin Univ, Inst Hlth Transformat, Ctr Qual & Patient Safety Res, Sch Nursing & Midwifery,Fac Hlth, Geelong, Vic 3220, Australia
[2] Alfred Hlth, 55 Commercial Rd, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Intensive care unit; Remote-only communication; Telehealth; Family-centred care; Patient-centred care; Clinical decision-making; Critical care; CENTERED CARE; ICU;
D O I
10.1016/j.aucc.2024.06.013
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: During the Covid-19 pandemic, family visitation to intensive care was severely restricted. In response, family communication moved to remote-only options. The effect on patients and families of this communication change is poorly understood. Objective: The aim of this review was to synthesise the available research on remote-only communication interventions and their effect on patient and family outcomes within the intensive care environment. Review method used: A systematic review of relevant studies was undertaken. Data sources: Databases included CINAHL, APA PsychINFO, MEDLINE, and Ovid Embase. Review methods: Databases were searched with a date restriction of June 1st, 2011, to June 1st, 2023. Two independent reviewers assessed each study using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool, version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomised controlled trials, and the Risk Of Bias In Nonrandomised Studies of Interventions tool for methodological quality and risk of bias. Of the 2292 articles screened, 10 studies met the inclusion criteria. Results: Ten studies were included (n 1 / 4 3861). Methodological quality was mostly poor, with one study evaluated as high on Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool quality criteria. Two themes were derived from the literature: (i) patient and family satisfaction; and (ii) patient and family psychological distress symptoms. Five studies reported patient and family satisfaction, with four studies finding statistically significant improvement following the communication intervention. However, only one of the five studies specifically evaluated the satisfaction with the communication intervention. Nine studies reported patient and family psychological distress symptoms, using 12 measurement tools. A variable effect of interventions was found within this theme. Conclusions: This review identified important gaps in the research examining remote-only family communication interventions in intensive care. Inconsistent delivery of remote-only communication interventions, biased research methods, and variable outcome measurement tools impacted the reliability and validity of current evidence. Further research on remote-only communication interventions and the effect on families is recommended. (c) 2024 Australian College of Critical Care Nurses Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Identifying improvement opportunities for patient- and family-centered care in the ICU: Using qualitative methods to understand family perspectives
    Agard, Anne Sophie
    Hofhuis, Jose G. M.
    Koopmans, Matty
    Gerritsen, Rik T.
    Spronk, Peter E.
    Engelberg, Ruth A.
    Curtis, J. Randall
    Zijlstra, Jan G.
    Jensen, Hanne Irene
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2019, 49 : 33 - 37
  • [2] Communication strategies to mitigate fear and suffering among COVID-19 patients isolated in the ICU and their families
    Akgun, Kathleen M.
    Shamas, Tracy L.
    Feder, Shelli L.
    Schulman-Green, Dena
    [J]. HEART & LUNG, 2020, 49 (04): : 344 - 345
  • [3] Communication between family carers and health professionals about end-of-life care for older people in the acute hospital setting: a qualitative study
    Caswell, Glenys
    Pollock, Kristian
    Harwood, Rowan
    Porock, Davina
    [J]. BMC PALLIATIVE CARE, 2015, 14
  • [4] Psychological effects of remote-only communication among reference persons of ICU patients during COVID-19 pandemic
    Cattelan, Jessy
    Castellano, Sara
    Merdji, Hamid
    Audusseau, Jean
    Claude, Baptiste
    Feuillassier, Lea
    Cunat, Sibylle
    Astrie, Marc
    Aquin, Camille
    Buis, Guillaume
    Gehant, Edgar
    Granier, Amandine
    Kercha, Hassiba
    Le Guillou, Camille
    Martin, Guillaume
    Roulot, Kevin
    Meziani, Ferhat
    Putois, Olivier
    Helms, Julie
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTENSIVE CARE, 2021, 9 (01)
  • [5] Family experiences and perceptions of intensive care unit care and communication during the COVID-19 pandemic
    Digby, R.
    Manias, E.
    Haines, K. J.
    Orosz, J.
    Ihle, J.
    Bucknall, T. K.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN CRITICAL CARE, 2023, 36 (03) : 350 - 360
  • [6] An informative nursing intervention for families of patients admitted to the intensive care unit regarding the satisfaction of their needs: The INFOUCI study
    Dolores Rodriguez-Huerta, Maria
    Alvarez-Pol, Maria
    Luz Fernandez-Catalan, Marta
    Fernandez-Vadillo, Rebeca
    Martin-Rodriguez, Maria
    Quicios-Dorado, Begona
    Diez-Fernandez, Ana
    [J]. INTENSIVE AND CRITICAL CARE NURSING, 2019, 55
  • [7] Outcomes of Patient- and Family-Centered Care Interventions in the ICU: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Goldfarb, Michael J.
    Bibas, Lior
    Bartlett, Virginia
    Jones, Heather
    Khan, Naureen
    [J]. CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2017, 45 (10) : 1751 - 1761
  • [8] Nurses' experiences of serving as a communication guide and supporting the implementation of a communication intervention in the intensive care unit
    Holm, Anna
    Karlsson, Veronika
    Dreyer, Pia
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES ON HEALTH AND WELL-BEING, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [9] The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) version 2018 for information professionals and researchers
    Hong, Quan Nha
    Fabregues, Sergi
    Bartlett, Gillian
    Boardman, Felicity
    Cargo, Margaret
    Dagenais, Pierre
    Gagnon, Marie-Pierre
    Griffiths, Frances
    Nicolau, Belinda
    O'Cathain, Alicia
    Rousseau, Marie-Claude
    Vedel, Isabelle
    Pluye, Pierre
    [J]. EDUCATION FOR INFORMATION, 2018, 34 (04) : 285 - 291
  • [10] The effect of structured virtual patient visits (sVPVs) on COVID-19 patients and relatives' anxiety levels in intensive care unit
    Kebapci, Ayda
    Turkmen, Emine
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2022, 31 (19-20) : 2900 - 2909