On the origin of the Critique of Practical Reason. The historical-philosophical context and its relevance for the translation of the work

被引:0
作者
Rivero, Gabriel [1 ]
机构
[1] Fernuniv, Hagen, Germany
关键词
Pure practical Reason; Complement; Empirical Reason; Suprasensible; einsehen;
D O I
10.5209/kant.98141
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The present article investigates the origin of the Critique of Practical Reason as an independent work. In opposition to the interpretations that see the origin of this work in the discovery of the antinomy of practical reason or in the discovery of the "fact" of reason, this article holds the thesis that Kant's decision is due to a new approach to the practical knowledge. This new approach is aimed, on the one hand, at answering criticisms that objected to the existence of pure reason; on the other hand, at showing practical reason as a "complement" to the speculative reason. On the basis of the historical-philosophical contextualisation of the second Critique, the last section of the paper discusses some aspects regarding the translation of the German verb "einsehen".
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 242
页数:10
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Abel J. F., 1787, Versuch uber die Natur speculativen Vernunft zur Prufung des Kantischen Systems
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1900, Gesammelte Schriften
[3]  
Beck L.W., 1985, Kants Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Ein Kommentar
[4]  
Brandt Horst D., Kritik der praktischen Vernunft by Immanuel Kant, pix
[5]  
Feder JohannGeorg Heinrich., 1787, RAUM CAUSALITAT PRUF
[6]  
Hernandez Marcos M., 2017, Critica de la razon practica, P11
[7]  
Kant I., 1998, Logik-Vorlesung. Unveroffentlichte Nachschriften I
[8]  
Klemme HeinerF., 2010, Kant's Critique of Practical Reason: A Critical Guide, P11
[9]  
Landau Albert., 1991, REZENSIONEN KANTISCH
[10]   The "way of Thinking consistently of the speculative Criticism" Kant radical Transformation of his Theory of Freedom in 1786 and the Consequences for the Critical Philosophy as a Whole [J].
Ludwig, Bernd .
DEUTSCHE ZEITSCHRIFT FUR PHILOSOPHIE, 2010, 58 (04) :595-628