Fertility preservation options at cancer diagnosis; classifying use and decision-making in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Pathak, Sarita [1 ]
Voigt, Paxton [2 ]
Bellon, Margot [3 ]
Vadaparampil, Susan T. [1 ,4 ]
Quinn, Gwendolyn P. [2 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr Res Inst, Hlth Outcomes & Behav, Tampa, FL USA
[2] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept OBGYN, 550 1st Ave,NBV9N1-F, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Off Community Outreach Engagement & Equ, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
Embryo cryopreservation; fertility preservation; oocyte cryopreservation; oncology; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; WOMEN; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1080/17446651.2024.2448789
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionIncidence rates for cancer among adolescent and young adults (AYA) have increased 30% since 1970. Declines in mortality underscore the importance of discussing fertility preservation (FP) options prior to receiving gonadotoxic treatments. National guidelines outline FP options including oocyte (OC), embryo (EC), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for female AYA patients. Significant progress has led to changes in FP practices, initially limited to EC. Subsequently, OC was deemed non-experimental in 2013, followed by OTC in 2020. Despite these advancements and guideline recommendations, the availability and utilization of FP services vary.Areas CoveredRapid review methodologies were employed to classify trends in female AYAs utilization of FP cryopreservation options following guideline updates. FP options reviewed include OC, EC, and OTC. Additionally, the review examined if aspects of the decision-making process relevant to FP were present.Expert OpinionTen articles met inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the declassification of OTC has not necessarily increased its use and OC and EC appear to be most frequently used. The factors associated with decision making appear to have remained consistent with financial constraints having the most impact, followed by partner status and concerns about recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 32
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Educational paperThe effect of cancer therapy on fertility, the assessment of fertility and fertility preservation options for pediatric patients
    Jill P. Ginsberg
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2011, 170 : 703 - 708
  • [42] Young Adult Female Cancer Survivors' Decision Regret About Fertility Preservation
    Benedict, Catherine
    Thom, Bridgette
    Kelvin, Joanne F.
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2015, 4 (04) : 213 - 218
  • [43] Decision on Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: Development of Information Materials for Healthcare Professionals
    Silva, Cristina
    Almeida-Santos, Ana Teresa
    Melo, Claudia
    Rama, Ana Cristina Ribeiro
    JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT AND YOUNG ADULT ONCOLOGY, 2017, 6 (02) : 353 - 357
  • [44] Psychological State and Decision Perceptions of Male and Female Cancer Patients on Fertility Preservation
    Chen, Minxin
    Zhang, Yin
    Zhang, Feng
    Jiang, Feng
    Wang, Xiao
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2022, 30 (07) : 5723 - 5728
  • [45] Gonadal damage and options for fertility preservation in female and male cancer survivors
    Maltaris, Theodoros
    Koelbl, Heinz
    Seufert, Rudolf
    Kiesewetter, Franklin
    Beckmann, Matthias W.
    Mueller, Andreas
    Dittrich, Ralf
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF ANDROLOGY, 2006, 8 (05) : 515 - 533
  • [46] Survey of Fertility Preservation Options Available to Patients With Cancer Around the Globe
    Rashedi, Alexandra S.
    de Roo, Saskia F.
    Ataman, Lauren M.
    Edmonds, Maxwell E.
    Silva, Adelino Amaral
    Scarella, Anibal
    Horbaczewska, Anna
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Arvas, Ayse
    de Carvalho, Bruno Ramalho
    Sartorio, Cassio
    Beerendonk, Catharina C. M.
    Diaz-Garcia, Cesar
    Suh, Chang Suk
    Melo, Claudia
    Andersen, Claus Yding
    Motta, Eduardo
    Greenblatt, Ellen M.
    Van Moer, Ellen
    Zand, Elnaz
    Reis, Fernando M.
    Sanchez, Flor
    Terrado, Guillermo
    Rodrigues, Jhenifer K.
    de Meneses e Silva, Joao Marcos
    Smitz, Johan
    Medrano, Jose
    Lee, Jung Ryeol
    Winkler-Crepaz, Katharina
    Smith, Kristin
    Ferreira Melo e Silva, Ligia Helena
    Wildt, Ludwig
    Salama, Mahmoud
    del Mar Andres, Maria
    Bourlon, Maria T.
    Vega, Mario
    Chehin, Mauricio Barbour
    De Vos, Michel
    Khrouf, Mohamed
    Suzuki, Nao
    Azmy, Osama
    Fontoura, Paula
    Almeida Campos-Junior, Paulo Henrique
    Mallmann, Peter
    Azambuja, Ricardo
    Marinho, Ricardo M.
    Anderson, Richard A.
    Jach, Robert
    Antunes, Roberto de A.
    Mitchell, Rod
    JCO GLOBAL ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 : 331 - 344
  • [47] Fertility knowledge and beliefs about fertility treatment: findings from the International Fertility Decision-making Study
    Bunting, Laura
    Tsibulsky, Ivan
    Boivin, Jacky
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (02) : 385 - 397
  • [48] Gonadal damage and options for fertility preservation in female and male cancer survivors
    TheodorosMaltaris
    HeinzKoelbl
    RudolfSeufert
    Franklin Kiesewetter
    MatthiasW.Beckmann
    AndreasMuellerRaftDittrich
    AsianJournalofAndrology, 2006, (05) : 515 - 533
  • [49] Fertility and breast cancer: A literature review of counseling, preservation options and outcomes
    Moragon, Santiago
    Di Liello, Raimondo
    Bermej, Begona
    Hernando, Cristina
    Olcina, Ernesto
    Chirivella, Isabel
    Lluch, Ana
    Cejalvo, Juan Miguel
    Martinez, Maria Teresa
    CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2021, 166
  • [50] Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment in the Decision-Making Process in Elderly Patients With Cancer: ELCAPA Study
    Caillet, Philippe
    Canoui-Poitrine, Florence
    Vouriot, Johanna
    Berle, Muriel
    Reinald, Nicoleta
    Krypciak, Sebastien
    Bastuji-Garin, Sylvie
    Culine, Stephane
    Paillaud, Elena
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2011, 29 (27) : 3636 - 3642