Fertility preservation options at cancer diagnosis; classifying use and decision-making in the United States

被引:1
|
作者
Pathak, Sarita [1 ]
Voigt, Paxton [2 ]
Bellon, Margot [3 ]
Vadaparampil, Susan T. [1 ,4 ]
Quinn, Gwendolyn P. [2 ]
机构
[1] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr Res Inst, Hlth Outcomes & Behav, Tampa, FL USA
[2] NYU, Grossman Sch Med, Dept OBGYN, 550 1st Ave,NBV9N1-F, New York, NY 10016 USA
[3] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] H Lee Moffitt Canc Ctr & Res Inst, Off Community Outreach Engagement & Equ, Tampa, FL USA
关键词
Embryo cryopreservation; fertility preservation; oocyte cryopreservation; oncology; ovarian tissue cryopreservation; WOMEN; PATTERNS;
D O I
10.1080/17446651.2024.2448789
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
IntroductionIncidence rates for cancer among adolescent and young adults (AYA) have increased 30% since 1970. Declines in mortality underscore the importance of discussing fertility preservation (FP) options prior to receiving gonadotoxic treatments. National guidelines outline FP options including oocyte (OC), embryo (EC), and ovarian tissue cryopreservation (OTC) for female AYA patients. Significant progress has led to changes in FP practices, initially limited to EC. Subsequently, OC was deemed non-experimental in 2013, followed by OTC in 2020. Despite these advancements and guideline recommendations, the availability and utilization of FP services vary.Areas CoveredRapid review methodologies were employed to classify trends in female AYAs utilization of FP cryopreservation options following guideline updates. FP options reviewed include OC, EC, and OTC. Additionally, the review examined if aspects of the decision-making process relevant to FP were present.Expert OpinionTen articles met inclusion criteria. Results suggest that the declassification of OTC has not necessarily increased its use and OC and EC appear to be most frequently used. The factors associated with decision making appear to have remained consistent with financial constraints having the most impact, followed by partner status and concerns about recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:21 / 32
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Fertility Preservation in Cancer Patients: In Vivo and In Vitro Options
    Fathi, Rouhollah
    Valojerdi, Mojtaba Rezazadeh
    Ebrahimi, Bita
    Eivazkhani, Farideh
    Akbarpour, Mahzad
    Tahaei, Leila Sadat
    Abtahi, Naeimeh Sadat
    CELL JOURNAL, 2017, 19 (02) : 173 - 183
  • [32] Fertility Preservation Options in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients With Cancer
    Burns, Karen C.
    Hoefgen, Holly
    Strine, Andrew
    Dasgupta, Roshni
    CANCER, 2018, 124 (09) : 1867 - 1876
  • [33] The effect of cancer therapy on fertility, the assessment of fertility and fertility preservation options for pediatric patients
    Ginsberg, Jill P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2011, 170 (06) : 703 - 708
  • [34] A review of factors affecting patient fertility preservation discussions & decision-making from the perspectives of patients and providers
    Daly, Corinne
    Micic, Selena
    Facey, Marcia
    Speller, Brittany
    Yee, Samantha
    Kennedy, Erin D.
    Corter, Arden L.
    Baxter, Nancy N.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2019, 28 (01)
  • [35] Cancer Survivors' Use of Fertility Preservation
    Bann, Carla M.
    Treiman, Katherine
    Squiers, Linda
    Tzeng, Janice
    Nutt, Stephanie
    Arvey, Sarah
    McGoldrick, Devon
    Rechis, Ruth
    JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2015, 24 (12) : 1030 - 1037
  • [36] VIABLE OPTIONS FOR FERTILITY PRESERVATION IN BREAST CANCER PATIENTS: A FOCUS ON LATIN AMERICA
    Lambertini, Matteo
    Goldrat, Oranite
    Barragan-Carrillo, Regina
    Viglietti, Giulia
    Demeestere, Isabelle
    Villarreal-Garza, Cynthia
    REVISTA DE INVESTIGACION CLINICA-CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL INVESTIGATION, 2017, 69 (02): : 103 - 113
  • [37] Systematic review of fertility preservation patient decision aids for cancer patients
    Wang, Yifan
    Anazodo, Antoinette
    Logan, Shanna
    PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2019, 28 (03) : 459 - 467
  • [38] The Decision-Making Process of Young Adult Women with Cancer Who Considered Fertility Cryopreservation
    Hershberger, Patricia E.
    Finnegan, Lorna
    Pierce, Penny F.
    Scoccia, Bert
    JOGNN-JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC GYNECOLOGIC AND NEONATAL NURSING, 2013, 42 (01): : 59 - 69
  • [39] Fertility preservation in endometrial cancer patients: options, challenges and perspectives
    Terzic, Milan
    Norton, Melanie
    Terzic, Sanja
    Bapayeva, Gauri
    Aimagambetova, Gulzhanat
    ECANCERMEDICALSCIENCE, 2020, 14
  • [40] Reproductive decision-making in the context of hereditary cancer: the effects of an online decision aid on informed decision-making
    Reumkens, Kelly
    Tummers, Marly H. E.
    Severijns, Yil
    Gietel-Habets, Joyce J. G.
    van Kuijk, Sander M. J.
    Aalfs, Cora M.
    van Asperen, Christi J.
    Ausems, Margreet G. E. M.
    Collee, Margriet
    Dommering, Charlotte J.
    Kets, Marleen
    van der Kolk, Lizet E.
    Oosterwijk, Jan C.
    Tjan-Heijnen, Vivianne C. G.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    de Die-Smulders, Christine E. M.
    van Osch, Liesbeth A. D. M.
    JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS, 2021, 12 (01) : 101 - 110