Digital Modeling of Intersubjectivity in Social Construction and Phenomenological Analyses of the World of Everyday Life

被引:0
作者
Dunaev, Vladimir Yu. [1 ]
Kurganskaya, Valentina D. [1 ]
Sagikyzy, Ayazhan [1 ]
机构
[1] Ministryof Sci & Higher Educ Republ Kazakhstan, Polit Sci & Relig Studies, Inst Philosophy, Sci Comm, 29 Kurmangazy str, Alma Ata 050010, Kazakhstan
关键词
intersubjectivity; phenomenology; digitalization; artificial intelligence; frame; everyday life;
D O I
10.21146/0042-8744-2024-9-136-146
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The widespread introduction of digital information and communication technologies is changing the very nature of interpersonal and mass social interaction ,creating new practices, meanings and forms of intersubjectivity. The article analyzes a number of approaches to the creation of general artificial intelligence(AGI) systems based on the convergence of methods of phenomenological analysis of intentional structures of intersubjectivity with technologies for creating and training artificial neural network systems of generative intelligence - Chat-GPT. It is shown that one of the most promising areas of constructing the cognitive architecture of AGI is the theory of frames as modeling schemes or matrices of stereotypical organization and interpretation of everyday experience. This conclusion is based on the fact that frames, as well as the procedures for switching and configuring them, act as a kind of "spiritual automata" that control typical behavior of people in typical situations. The dual role of digital platforms in the social construction of reality is shown. On the one hand, digital platforms allow users to realize their aspirations and express the uniqueness of their individuality, facilitate access to information, etc. On the other hand, our digital alter Ego, generated by intelligent systems, acquires the ability to recursively target, direct and control our thinking, motivations, emotional reactions, etc. The direct digital access to our spiritual life is not an inevitable consequence of the intro-duction of digital technologies into the world of everyday life, but a political project that can and should be sought for effective alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:136 / 146
页数:225
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Armano E., 2022, Digital Platforms and Algorithmic Subjectivities, P1
  • [2] Danaher John, 2020, The Oxford Hand- book of Philosophy of Technology, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190851187.013.16, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190851187.013.16]
  • [3] Dyer-Whiteford Nick., 2019, Inhuman Power: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Capitalism
  • [4] Floridi L., 2015, The onlife-manifesto: being human in a hyperconnected era, DOI [10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-04093-6]
  • [5] Hassan R, 2020, Critical Digital an, P1, DOI 10.16997/book44.a
  • [6] Kashtanova Sofia M., 2020, Philosophical Analytics of the Digital Era: a Collection of Scientific Articles, P234
  • [7] Kotkin Egor, 2023, NBICS-NT, V19, P73
  • [8] When data is capital: Datafication, accumulation, and extraction
    Sadowski, Jathan
    [J]. BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2019, 6 (01):
  • [9] Schiller Dan., 2000, Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System
  • [10] Shroff Marie, 2010, Information Polity, V15, P299, DOI 10.3233/IP-2010-0162