Comparative analysis of patient-reported outcomes in joint arthroplasty surgeries

被引:0
作者
Aarimaa, Ville [1 ,2 ]
Kohtala, Karita [2 ]
Makela, Keijo [1 ,2 ]
Karvonen, Mikko [1 ,2 ]
Arimaa, Anssi [1 ,2 ]
Ryosa, Anssi [1 ,2 ]
Kostensalo, Joel [3 ]
Kaivonen, Fanny [1 ]
Laaksonen, Inari [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Turku Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped & Traumatol, Turku, Finland
[2] Univ Turku, Turku, Finland
[3] Nat Resources Inst Finland, Joensuu, Finland
关键词
MEANINGFUL IMPROVEMENT; WESTERN ONTARIO; HIP SCORE; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PREDICTORS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0314818
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background This study aims to report and analyze disease-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) effect size (ES) variations, in patients undergoing major arthroplasty surgery. Material and methods All institution-based data of primary knee, hip, or shoulder arthroplasty patients at Turku University hospital (Finland) between January 2020 -December 2022 were collected, and treatment outcome assessed as a PROM difference between baseline and one-year follow-up. PROM ES were calculated for each patient and patient group separately, and patients with ES >0.5, were considered responders. Factors contributing to patient outcome and differences between patient groups were investigated using linear models and non-parametric methods. Results 2580 patients were operated (complete follow-up data on 1828 patients). 1110 (61%) of the patients were female, and mean age was 69 years (SD 10). The mean ES across all patient groups was 2.64 (SD 1.29) and the biggest ES was observed in shoulder patients and the smallest in knee patients. Smaller ES was statistically significantly associated with higher preoperative PROM, higher ASA class, and old age. The percentage of responders was highest for shoulder patients (97.7%), followed by hip patients (96.8%), and lowest for knee patients (92.5%). Conclusion The observed ES for joint arthroplasty surgeries is high. However, there are significant disparities among patients with primary knee, hip, and shoulder joint arthroplasty surgery. These variations are mainly due to differences in preoperative PROM score and may be attributed to differences in patient selection. We recommend that prior to shared decision-making, preoperative scores are thoroughly reviewed with the patient, along with other patient specific factors that may influence the end result of the treatment.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Kellgren-Lawrence scoring system underestimates cartilage damage when indicating TKA: preoperative radiograph versus intraoperative photograph [J].
Abdelaziz, Hussein ;
Balde, Oury M. ;
Citak, Mustafa ;
Gehrke, Thorsten ;
Magan, Ahmed ;
Haasper, Carl .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2019, 139 (09) :1287-1292
[2]   The minimal clinically important difference raised the significance of outcome effects above the statistical level, with methodological implications for future studies [J].
Angst, Felix ;
Aeschlimann, Andre ;
Angst, Jules .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2017, 82 :128-136
[3]  
[Anonymous], WHO WEB PAGE
[4]   The discordance between clinical and radiographic knee osteoarthritis: A systematic search and summary of the literature [J].
Bedson, John ;
Croft, Peter R. .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2008, 9 (1)
[5]   Can Preoperative Patient-reported Outcome Measures Be Used to Predict Meaningful Improvement in Function After TKA? [J].
Berliner, Jonathan L. ;
Brodke, Dane J. ;
Chan, Vanessa ;
SooHoo, Nelson F. ;
Bozic, Kevin J. .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2017, 475 (01) :149-157
[6]   Association between radiological findings and symptoms at the patellofemoral joint in advanced knee osteoarthritis [J].
Chang, C. B. ;
Han, I. ;
Kim, S. J. ;
Seong, S. C. ;
Kim, T. K. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2007, 89B (10) :1324-1328
[7]   A POWER PRIMER [J].
COHEN, J .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) :155-159
[8]   I can't get no satisfaction after my total knee replacement RHYMES AND REASONS [J].
Dunbar, M. J. ;
Richardson, G. ;
Robertsson, O. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2013, 95B (11) :148-152
[9]   Poor quality patient reported outcome measures bias effect estimates in orthopaedic randomized studies [J].
Gagnier, Joel J. ;
Johnston, Bradley C. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2019, 116 :36-38
[10]   Longitudinal changes in patient-reported outcome measures following total hip arthroplasty and predictors of deterioration during follow-up A SEVEN-YEAR PROSPECTIVE INTERNATIONAL MULTICENTRE STUDY [J].
Galea, V. P. ;
Roianasopondist, P. ;
Ingelsrud, L. H. ;
Rubash, H. E. ;
Bragdon, C. ;
Huddleston, J. I., III ;
Malchau, H. ;
Troelsen, A. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2019, 101B (07) :768-778