Integrating Paths: Enhancing Deliberative Democracy Through Collective Intelligence Insights

被引:0
作者
Rask, Mikko [1 ]
Shin, Bokyong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Ctr Consumer Soc Res, Helsinki 00014, Finland
关键词
deliberative democracy; participatory governance; democratic innovations; public sector; digital tools in governance; policymaking; SCIENCE;
D O I
10.3390/soc14120270
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This literature review critically examines the potential of collective intelligence (CI) to enhance theories of deliberative democracy and participatory governance through academic discourse. We employed PRISMA guidelines for systematic article selection, complemented by a narrative approach for in-depth thematic analysis and supplemented by quantitative methodologies such as Sankey diagrams and keyness analysis. Reviewing 61 scholarly articles focusing on CI within the public sector, this study identifies theoretical insights that could significantly impact the field of democratic innovations and participatory governance. Our analysis reveals that CI methodologies can make governance more inclusive and dynamic by integrating advanced digital tools that foster broader and more effective citizen participation. We conclude that integrating CI with deliberative democracy and participatory governance theories holds substantial promise for developing more responsive and adaptive governance models. Future research should focus on measuring deliberative quality in real time, deploying CI tools to empower underrepresented groups and address specific governance challenges, and examining CI's ethical and social implications, especially concerning privacy, security, and power dynamics in technology-driven public decision-making.
引用
收藏
页数:27
相关论文
共 55 条
[1]   Collective Intelligence in Law Reforms: When the Logic of the Crowds and the Logic of Policymaking Collide [J].
Aitamurto, Tanja .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 49TH ANNUAL HAWAII INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEM SCIENCES (HICSS 2016), 2016, :2780-2789
[2]  
Bachtiger A., 2018, OXFORD HDB DELIBERAT, DOI [10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.013.50, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198747369.013.50, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780198747369.001.0001]
[3]  
Bchtiger A., 2018, The Oxford handbook of deliberative democracy
[4]  
Beckman L, 2022, Philosophy & Technology, V35, DOI [10.1007/s13347-022-00525-3, 10.1007/s13347-022-00525-3, DOI 10.1007/S13347-022-00525-3]
[5]  
Benkler Y., 2008, Collective Intelligence: Creating a Prosperous World at Peace
[6]  
Berditchevskaia A, 2022, Collective Intelligence, V1, DOI [10.1177/26339137221107924, 10.1177/26339137221107924, DOI 10.1177/26339137221107924]
[7]   Adversarial Dynamics in Centralized Versus Decentralized Intelligent Systems [J].
Brinkmann, Levin ;
Cebrian, Manuel ;
Pescetelli, Niccolo .
TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2025, 17 (02) :374-391
[8]  
Bruzzone A.G., 2014, P MAS BORD FRANC 12, P12
[9]   Deep Learning Meets Deep Democracy: Deliberative Governance and Responsible Innovation in Artificial Intelligence [J].
Buhmann, Alexander ;
Fieseler, Christian .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2023, 33 (01) :146-179
[10]   The network science of collective intelligence br [J].
Centola, Damon .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2022, 26 (11) :923-941