Seismic Dynamic Response Analysis Method of Tunnel Considering Coseismic Dislocation

被引:0
作者
Feng, Jun [1 ,2 ]
Zhao, Boming [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Zijun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Key Lab Urban Underground Engn, Minist Educ, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Jiaotong Univ, Sch Civil Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Seismic wave propagation simulation; Soil-structure interaction; Viscous-spring boundary; Tunnel structure; Numerical simulation; FAULT RUPTURE PROPAGATION; FINITE-ELEMENT-ANALYSIS; TENSILE FAULTS; DEFORMATION; EARTHQUAKES; IMPACT; DAMAGE; SHEAR; CRUST;
D O I
10.1007/s00603-025-04458-z
中图分类号
P5 [地质学];
学科分类号
0709 ; 081803 ;
摘要
The damage effects of the earthquake on tunnels crossing faults are categorized into two types: inertial forces generated by ground motions and permanent stratigraphic deformations caused by fault dislocations. A seismic dynamic analysis method of tunnel considering coseismic dislocation is proposed by introducing the numerical simulation of seismic wave propagation into the soil-structure dynamic analysis research field. First, seismic waves are simulated according to the finite-difference method. The stress, displacement, and velocity of nodes on the truncated boundary of the soil-structure model can be calculated according to the seismic wave propagation simulation method. Then, the seismic waves and dynamic dislocation load are simulated in the finite element model by the viscous-spring boundary. Based on the free-field model, the reliability of the presented method is validated in simulating coseismic deformation and seismic waves. In the case of the 2022 MS 6.9 Menyuan earthquake and the Daliang tunnel, which was severely damaged by this earthquake, the deformation of the tunnel simulated based on the presented method is consistent with the previous method. The proposed method can offer guidance for the seismic fortification of tunnel engineering.
引用
收藏
页码:6557 / 6573
页数:17
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]  
Aki K., 2002, Quantitative seismology: theory and methods, VII
[2]   Fault rupture propagation through sand: Finite-element analysis and validation through centrifuge experiments [J].
Anastasopoulos, I. ;
Gazetas, G. ;
Bransby, M. F. ;
Davies, M. C. R. ;
El Nahas, A. .
JOURNAL OF GEOTECHNICAL AND GEOENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING, 2007, 133 (08) :943-958
[3]  
Aoi S, 1999, B SEISMOL SOC AM, V89, P918
[4]  
Asakura T., 1996, SOILS FDN JAPANESE G, P301, DOI 10.3208/sandf.36.Special_301
[5]   Evaluation of underground tunnel response to reverse fault rupture using numerical approach [J].
Baziar, Mohammad Hassan ;
Nabizadeh, Ali ;
Mehrabi, Ronak ;
Lee, Chung Jung ;
Hung, Wen Yi .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2016, 83 :1-17
[6]   Parallel 3-D viscoelastic finite difference seismic modelling [J].
Bohlen, T .
COMPUTERS & GEOSCIENCES, 2002, 28 (08) :887-899
[7]   The seismic damage mechanism of Daliang tunnel by fault dislocation during the 2022 Menyuan Ms6.9 earthquake based on unidirectional velocity pulse input [J].
Chen, Pingliang ;
Geng, Ping ;
Chen, Junbo ;
Gu, Wenqi .
ENGINEERING FAILURE ANALYSIS, 2023, 145
[8]   Damage characteristics and influence factors of mountain tunnels under strong earthquakes [J].
Chen, Zhiyi ;
Shi, Cheng ;
Li, Tianbin ;
Yuan, Yong .
NATURAL HAZARDS, 2012, 61 (02) :387-401
[9]   A model study on the effects of input motion on the seismic behaviour of tunnels [J].
Cilingir, Ulas ;
Madabhushi, S. P. Gopal .
SOIL DYNAMICS AND EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (03) :452-462
[10]   AXISYMMETRICAL TIME-DOMAIN TRANSMITTING BOUNDARIES [J].
DEEKS, AJ ;
RANDOLPH, MF .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING MECHANICS-ASCE, 1994, 120 (01) :25-42