Enhanced Forecasting and Assessment of Urban Air Quality by an Automated Machine Learning System: The AI-Air

被引:0
作者
Yang, Jiayu [1 ,2 ]
Ke, Huabing [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Gong, Sunling [1 ,2 ,6 ]
Wang, Yaqiang [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Zhang, Lei [1 ,2 ]
Zhou, Chunhong [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Jingyue [7 ]
You, Yan [6 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, Key Lab Atmospher Chem CMA, Beijing, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, State Key Lab Severe Weather, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Chinese Acad Meteorol Sci, Inst Artificial Intelligence Meteorol, Beijing, Peoples R China
[5] Xiongan Inst Meteorol Artificial Intelligence, Beijing, Peoples R China
[6] Macau Univ Sci & Technol, Macao Environm Res Inst, Natl Observat & Res Stn Coastal Ecol Environm Maca, Macau, Peoples R China
[7] China Meteorol Adm, Publ Meteorol Serv Ctr, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
automated air quality forecasting system (AI-air); machine learning; explanatory analyses; key meteorological factors; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL-NETWORKS; OZONE POLLUTION; EAST-ASIA; CHINA; MODEL; TEMPERATURE; CUACE/DUST; DEPENDENCE; CHEMISTRY; ENSEMBLE;
D O I
10.1029/2024EA003942
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
An automated air quality forecasting system (AI-Air) was developed to optimize and improve air quality forecasting for different typical cities, combined with the China Meteorological Administration Unified Atmospheric Chemistry Environmental Model (CUACE), and used in a typical inland city of Zhengzhou and a coastal city of Haikou in China. The performance evaluation results show that for the PM2.5 forecasts, the correlation coefficient (R) is increased by 0.07-0.13, and the mean error (ME) and root mean square error (RMSE) is decreased by 3.2-3.5 and 3.8-4.7 mu g/m(3). Similarly, for the O3 forecasts, the R value is improved by 0.09-0.44, and ME and RMSE values are reduced by 7.1-22.8 and 9.0-25.9 mu g/m(3), respectively. Case analyses of operational forecasting also indicate that the AI-Air system can significantly improve the forecasting performance of pollutant concentrations and effectively correct underestimation, or overestimation phenomena compared to the CUACE model. Additionally, explanatory analyses were performed to assess the key meteorological factors affecting air quality in cities with different topographic and climatic conditions. The AI-Air system highlights the potential of AI techniques to improve forecast accuracy and efficiency, and with promising applications in the field of air quality forecasting.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]   Air quality forecasting using arti ficial neural networks with real time dynamic error correction in highly polluted regions [J].
Agarwal, Shivang ;
Sharma, Sumit ;
Suresh, R. ;
Rahman, Md H. ;
Vranckx, Stijn ;
Maiheu, Bino ;
Blyth, Lisa ;
Janssen, Stijn ;
Gargava, Prashant ;
Shukla, V. K. ;
Batra, Sakshi .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 735
[2]   Development of an adjoint model of GRAPES-CUACE and its application in tracking influential haze source areas in north China [J].
An, Xing Qin ;
Zhai, Shi Xian ;
Jin, Min ;
Gong, Sunling ;
Wang, Yu .
GEOSCIENTIFIC MODEL DEVELOPMENT, 2016, 9 (06) :2153-2165
[3]   Ozone and other air quality-related variables affecting visibility in the southeast United States [J].
Aneja, VP ;
Brittig, JS ;
Kim, DS ;
Hanna, A .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2004, 54 (06) :681-688
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, Tree Boosting with Xgboost-Why Does Xgboost Win"Every"Machine Learning Competition?
[5]   GLOBAL AIR-POLLUTION AND CLIMATIC CHANGE [J].
BACH, W .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 1976, 14 (03) :429-474
[6]   Air Pollution Forecasts: An Overview [J].
Bai, Lu ;
Wang, Jianzhou ;
Ma, Xuejiao ;
Lu, Haiyan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 15 (04)
[7]   Dependence of daily peak O3 concentrations near Houston, Texas on environmental factors: Wind speed, temperature, and boundary-layer depth [J].
Banta, Robert M. ;
Senff, Christoph J. ;
Alvarez, Raul J. ;
Langford, Andrew O. ;
Parrish, David D. ;
Trainer, Michael K. ;
Darby, Lisa S. ;
Hardesty, R. Michael ;
Lambeth, Bryan ;
Neuman, J. Andrew ;
Angevine, Wayne M. ;
Nielsen-Gammon, John ;
Sandberg, Scott P. ;
White, Allen B. .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2011, 45 (01) :162-173
[8]   Relation between prognostics predictor evaluation metrics andlocal interpretability SHAP values [J].
Baptista, Marcia L. ;
Goebel, Kai ;
Henriques, Elsa M. P. .
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2022, 306
[9]   Ensemble of recurrent neural networks with long short-term memory cells for high-rate structural health monitoring [J].
Barzegar, Vahid ;
Laflamme, Simon ;
Hu, Chao ;
Dodson, Jacob .
MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2022, 164
[10]   Air-temperature dependence of the ozone generation rate in the surface air layer [J].
Belan B.D. ;
Savkin D.E. ;
Tolmachev G.N. .
Atmospheric and Oceanic Optics, 2018, 31 (2) :187-196