F-18 FDG PET/CT Imaging in Normal Variants, Pitfalls and Artifacts in the Abdomen and Pelvis

被引:0
作者
Vangu, Mboyo D. T. [1 ]
Momodu, Jaleelat I. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Witwatersrand, Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Acad Hosp, Dept Nucl Med & Mol Imaging, Johannesburg, South Africa
来源
FRONTIERS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE | 2022年 / 1卷
关键词
FDG; abdomen; pelvis; PET/CT; pitfalls; variants; EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY/COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; TUMOR;
D O I
10.3389/fnume.2021.826109
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Since its introduction into clinical practice, multimodality imaging has revolutionized diagnostic imaging for both oncologic and non-oncologic pathologies. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT imaging which takes advantage of increased anaerobic glycolysis that occurs in tumor cells (Warburg effect) has gained significant clinical relevance in the management of most, if not all oncologic conditions. Because FDG is taken by both normal and abnormal tissues, PET/CT imaging may demonstrate several normal variants and imaging pitfalls. These may ultimately impact disease detection and diagnostic accuracy. Imaging specialists (nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists) must demonstrate a thorough understanding of normal and physiologic variants in the distribution of 18F-FDG; including potential imaging pitfalls and technical artifacts to minimize misinterpretation of images. The normal physiologic course of 18F-FDG results in a variable degree of uptake in the stomach, liver, spleen, small and large bowel. Urinary excretion results in renal, ureteric, and urinary bladder uptake. Technical artifacts can occur due to motion, truncation as well as the effects of contrast agents and metallic hardware. Using pictorial illustrations, this paper aims to describe the variants of physiologic 18F-FDG uptake that may mimic pathology as well as potential benign conditions that may result in misinterpretation of PET/CT images in common oncologic conditions of the abdomen and pelvis.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Incidental focal colorectal 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake on positron emission tomography/computed tomography [J].
Cho, Soung Hoon ;
Kim, Sang Woo ;
Kim, Won Chul ;
Park, Jae Myung ;
Yoo, Ie Ryung ;
Kim, Sung Hoon ;
Oh, Seong Taek .
WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (22) :3453-3458
[2]   Pitfalls and Artifacts in the Use of PET/CT in Oncology Imaging [J].
Corrigan, Alexis Joseph George ;
Schleyer, Paul John ;
Cook, Gary John .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 45 (06) :481-499
[3]   Utility of positron emission tomography/CT in the evaluation of small bowel pathology [J].
Cronin, C. G. ;
Scott, J. ;
Kambadakone, A. ;
Catalano, O. A. ;
Sahani, D. ;
Blake, M. A. ;
McDermott, S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2012, 85 (1017) :1211-1221
[4]  
Diederichs CG, 1998, J NUCL MED, V39, P1030
[5]   Correlation of GLUT-1 overexpression, tumor size, and depth of invasion with 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake by positron emission tomography in colorectal cancer [J].
Gu, Jinyu ;
Yamamoto, Hirofumi ;
Fukunaga, Hiroki ;
Danno, Katsuki ;
Takemasa, Ichiro ;
Ikeda, Masataka ;
Tatsumi, Mitsuaki ;
Sekimoto, Mitsugu ;
Hatazawa, Jun ;
Nishimura, Tsunehiko ;
Monden, Morito .
DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2006, 51 (12) :2198-2205
[6]   Incidental colonic focal lesions detected by FDG PET/CT [J].
Gutman, F ;
Alberini, JL ;
Wartski, M ;
Vilain, D ;
Le Stanc, E ;
Sarandi, F ;
Corone, C ;
Tainturier, C ;
Pecking, AP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2005, 185 (02) :495-500
[7]   Impact of Plasma Glucose Level at the Time of Fluorodeoxyglucose Administration on the Accuracy of FDG-PET/CT in the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Lesions [J].
Jahromi, Alireza Hamidian ;
Fallahzadeh, Mohammad Kazem ;
Takalkar, Amol ;
Sheng, Jean ;
Zibari, Gazi ;
Amiri, Hosein Shokouh .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY AND METABOLISM, 2014, 12 (04)
[8]   Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers [J].
Jayaprakasam, Vetri Sudar ;
Paroder, Viktoriya ;
Schoder, Heiko .
SEMINARS IN NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2021, 51 (05) :485-501
[9]  
Jian Y., 2018, PET Clin, V13, P249, DOI [10.1016/j.cpet.2017.11.009, DOI 10.1016/J.CPET.2017.11.009]
[10]   FDG PET/CT Pitfalls in Gynecologic and Genitourinary Oncologic Imaging1 [J].
Lakhani, Amish ;
Khan, Sairah R. ;
Bharwani, Nishat ;
Stewart, Victoria ;
Rockall, Andrea G. ;
Khan, Sameer ;
Barwick, Tara D. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2017, 37 (02) :577-594