共 50 条
Personality Feedback With Tailored Self-Care Recommendations Improves Self-Efficacy for Cancer Management: A Randomized Controlled Trial
被引:0
|作者:
Perry, Laura M.
[1
,2
,3
]
Mossman, Brenna
[4
]
Garcia, Sofia F.
[3
]
Kircher, Sheetal M.
[3
]
Dunn, Addison
[4
]
Alonzi, Sarah
[5
]
Easwar, Sanjana
[6
]
Hoerger, Michael
[1
,2
,4
]
机构:
[1] Tulane Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[2] Louisiana Canc Res Ctr LCRC, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
[3] Northwestern Univ, Feinberg Sch Med, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
[4] Tulane Univ, Dept Psychol, New Orleans, LA USA
[5] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA USA
[6] Louisiana State Univ, Sch Med, New Orleans, LA USA
关键词:
behavioral medicine;
cancer;
clinical trial;
emotions;
oncology;
personality assessment;
self-efficacy;
self-management;
VALIDATION;
IMPACT;
D O I:
10.1002/pon.70023
中图分类号:
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号:
100214 ;
摘要:
Objective: To test whether a personality feedback intervention improves three domains of cancer self-management: self-awareness, self-efficacy, and positive affect. Methods: From 11/2020-02/2021, 372 adults diagnosed with cancer participated in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of an intervention that entailed reading a brief personality-related excerpt during an online survey. Eligibility included self-reported age >= 18 years, current or past cancer diagnosis, and ability to read English. The survey included a baseline assessment with a personality questionnaire, then randomized participants to one of two groups. The intervention group (n = 184) received a personality feedback report with tailored self-care tips, whereas the control group (n = 188) received a generic reading on personality theory. At the end of the survey, participants completed outcome measures of self-awareness (primary), self-efficacy for illness management, and positive affect. General linear models tested between-group differences in changes from baseline to post-test on each outcome. Results: There was no intervention effect on self-awareness (primary outcome) or positive affect. However, compared to controls, intervention participants experienced a greater increase in self-efficacy for illness management (d = 0.33, p = 0.002), including in 2 of 3 constituent domains: self-efficacy for managing symptoms (d = 0.36, p < 0.001) and self-efficacy for managing treatments/medication (d = 0.22, p = 0.035). Conclusion: Despite the primary outcome's null results, this was the first RCT of a personality feedback intervention to show improvements in self-efficacy for managing chronic illness. Given the important role of self-efficacy in self-management, the intervention has implications for other cancer outcomes. Follow-up studies on longer-term outcomes such as health behaviors and quality of life should be explored.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文