Measuring commitment in paws: Adaptation of the Investment Model Scale to the context of companion animals with a Portuguese sample

被引:0
作者
Aguiar, Tiago Roxo [1 ,2 ]
Lopes, Diniz [1 ]
Rodrigues, David L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Iscte Inst Univ Lisboa, CIS Iscte, Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Iscte Inst Univ Lisboa, BRU Iscte, Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Psychometrics; Scale development; Commitment; Content validity; Construct validity; Criterion-related validity; Reliability; COVARIANCE STRUCTURE-ANALYSIS; CLOSE RELATIONSHIPS; PET OWNERSHIP; HEALTH; SATISFACTION; BENEFITS; METAANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; VALIDATION; ATTACHMENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.jveb.2025.01.008
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Commitment has a crucial role in predicting intentions and behaviors toward relationship maintenance. The Investment Model Scale (IMS; Rusbult et al., 1998) offers an empirically supported framework to describe and quantify commitment in various contexts, particularly romantic relationships. Only a few studies have attempted to extend this theoretical framework to examine human and companion animals (H-CA) relationships and measurement instruments lack psychometric evidence. We adapted the IMS to H-CA relationships based on previous studies and discussions with various experts (Study 1a), to help us clarify some items and develop new ones. We then performed Exploratory (Study 1b, N = 248) and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (Study 2, N = 236), to assess the scale's psychometric capabilities in this new context. During study 2, we also investigated scale sensitivity and criterion-based validity. Exploratory factor analyses showed that variables assessed by the IMS are transferable to the H-CA context. The same structure was found in the Confirmatory Factor Analyses. Results showed this new version of the IMS is psychometrically sound to be used by researchers and professionals, with the added precaution that the "Quality of Alternatives" dimension does not translate completely to this new H-CA environment and warrants further study.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 105
页数:15
相关论文
共 60 条
  • [21] DeMello M., 2021, Animals and Society. An Introduction to Human-Animal Studies, DOI [10.7312/deme19484, DOI 10.7312/DEME19484]
  • [22] A Cross-Sectional Study of Knowledge on Ownership, Zoonoses and Practices among Pet Owners in Northern Portugal
    do Vale, Beatriz
    Lopes, Ana Patricia
    Fontes, Maria da Conceicao
    Silvestre, Mario
    Cardoso, Luis
    Coelho, Ana Claudia
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2021, 11 (12):
  • [23] The Link between the Nature of the Human-Companion Animal Relationship and Well-Being Outcomes in Companion Animal Owners
    Ellis, Annalyse
    Stanton, Sarah C. E.
    Hawkins, Roxanne D.
    Loughnan, Steve
    [J]. ANIMALS, 2024, 14 (03):
  • [24] The Psychology of Close Relationships: Fourteen Core Principles
    Finkel, Eli J.
    Simpson, Jeffry A.
    Eastwick, Paul W.
    [J]. ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, VOL 68, 2017, 68 : 383 - 411
  • [25] Fonseca G., 2015, Research and Reports in Forensic Medical Science, DOI [10.2147/RRFMS.S92068, DOI 10.2147/RRFMS.S92068, 10.2147/rrfms.S92068]
  • [26] George D., 2003, SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, V4th
  • [27] Gender differences in human-animal interactions: A review
    Herzog, Harold A.
    [J]. ANTHROZOOS, 2007, 20 (01): : 7 - 21
  • [28] Pets' Impact on Your Patients' Health: Leveraging Benefits and Mitigating Risk
    Hodgson, Kate
    Barton, Luisa
    Darling, Marcia
    Antao, Viola
    Kim, Florence A.
    Monavvari, Alan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN BOARD OF FAMILY MEDICINE, 2015, 28 (04) : 526 - 534
  • [29] Social Relationships and Mortality Risk: A Meta-analytic Review
    Holt-Lunstad, Julianne
    Smith, Timothy B.
    Layton, J. Bradley
    [J]. PLOS MEDICINE, 2010, 7 (07)
  • [30] Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria Versus New Alternatives
    Hu, Li-tze
    Bentler, Peter M.
    [J]. STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 1999, 6 (01) : 1 - 55