Qualitative study on shared decision making in cystitis management in general practice

被引:0
|
作者
van Horrik, Tessa M. Z. X. K. [1 ]
Colliers, Annelies [2 ]
Blanker, Marco H. [3 ]
de Bont, Eefje G. P. M. [4 ]
van Driel, Antoinette A. [5 ]
Laan, Bart J. [1 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Venekamp, Roderick P. [6 ]
Anthierens, Sibyl [2 ]
Platteel, Tamara N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Infect & Immun, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth,Dept Internal Med Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Primary & Long Term Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice & Nursing Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Author qualitative research; cystitis; general practice; decision making; shared; urinary tract infections; primary health care; primary care nursing; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENT; WOMEN; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0179
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cystitis is commonly treated with antibiotics, although non- antibiotic options could be considered for healthy non- pregnant women. Shared decision making (SDM) can be used in cystitis management to discuss the various treatment options but is not frequently applied in general practice. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators for applying SDM in cystitis management in general practice. Design & setting: Qualitative explorative research in general practice with healthcare professionals (HCPs; GPs and GP assistants) and healthy non- pregnant women with a recent history of cystitis (patients). Method: Individual semi- structured interviews were conducted between May and October 2022. We applied a combination of thematic and framework analysis. Results: Ten GPs, seven GP assistants, and 15 patients were interviewed. We identified the following three main barriers and one key facilitator: (1) applying SDM is deemed inefficient; (2) HCPs assume that patients expect antibiotic treatment and some HCPs consider non- antibiotic treatment inferior; (3) patients are largely unaware of the various non- antibiotic treatment options for cystitis; and (4) HCPs recognise some benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management, including reduced antibiotic use and improved patient empowerment, and patients appreciate involvement in treatment decisions, but preferences for SDM vary. Conclusion: SDM is infrequently applied in cystitis treatment in general practice owing to the current focus on efficient cystitis management that omits patient contact, HCPs' perceptions, and patient unawareness. Nevertheless, both HCPs and patients recognise the long- term benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management. Our findings facilitate the development of tailored interventions to increase the application of SDM, which should be co- created with HCPs and patients, and fit into the current efficient cystitis management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Influences of peer facilitation in general practice - a qualitative study
    Due, Tina Drud
    Kousgaard, Marius Brostrom
    Waldorff, Frans Boch
    Thorsen, Thorkil
    BMC FAMILY PRACTICE, 2018, 19
  • [32] Interconception care in Australian general practice: a qualitative study
    James, Sharon
    Watson, Cathy
    Bernard, Elodie
    Rathnasekara, Greasha K.
    Mazza, Danielle
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2023, 73 (737) : E949 - E957
  • [33] Cultural adaptation of a shared decision making tool with Aboriginal women: a qualitative study
    Janet Jull
    Audrey Giles
    Yvonne Boyer
    Dawn Stacey
    BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 15
  • [34] Shared decision-making for women facing an unplanned pregnancy: A qualitative study
    Ueno, Yoko
    Kako, Mayumi
    Ohira, Mitsuko
    Okamura, Hitoshi
    NURSING & HEALTH SCIENCES, 2020, 22 (04) : 1186 - 1196
  • [35] The experience of shared decision-making for people with asthma: A systematic review and metasynthesis of qualitative studies
    Kang, Hui-qi
    Pen, Yueming
    He, Yuanyuan
    Yang, Xiufen
    Su, Jin
    Yang, Qiaohong
    Luo, Weixiang
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2024, 27 (02)
  • [36] Cultural adaptation of a shared decision making tool with Aboriginal women: a qualitative study
    Jull, Janet
    Giles, Audrey
    Boyer, Yvonne
    Stacey, Dawn
    BMC MEDICAL INFORMATICS AND DECISION MAKING, 2015, 15
  • [37] How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    Koelewijn-van Loon, Marije S.
    Knaapen, Loes
    Legare, France
    Boivin, Antoine
    Burgers, Jako S.
    Stiggelbout, Anne M.
    Faber, Marjan
    Elwyn, Glyn
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2013, 22 (10) : 855 - 863
  • [38] Shared decision making between older people with multimorbidity and GPs: a qualitative study
    Brown, Emily L.
    Poltawski, Leon
    Pitchforth, Emma
    Richards, Suzanne H.
    Campbell, John L.
    Butterworth, Joanne E.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2022, 72 (721) : E609 - E618
  • [39] Optimising management of UTIs n primary care: a qualitative study of patient and GP perspectives to inform the development of an evidence-based, shared decision-making resource
    Lecky, Donna M.
    Howdle, Jessica
    Butler, Christopher C.
    McNulty, Cliodna
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2020, 70 (694) : E330 - E338
  • [40] A systematic review of shared decision making training programs for general practitioners
    Jaeken, Jasmien
    Billiouw, Cathoo
    Mertens, Lien
    Van Bostraeten, Pieter
    Bekkering, Geertruida
    Vermandere, Mieke
    Aertgeerts, Bert
    van Mileghem, Laura
    Delvaux, Nicolas
    BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2024, 24 (01)