Qualitative study on shared decision making in cystitis management in general practice

被引:0
|
作者
van Horrik, Tessa M. Z. X. K. [1 ]
Colliers, Annelies [2 ]
Blanker, Marco H. [3 ]
de Bont, Eefje G. P. M. [4 ]
van Driel, Antoinette A. [5 ]
Laan, Bart J. [1 ]
Geerlings, Suzanne E. [1 ]
Venekamp, Roderick P. [6 ]
Anthierens, Sibyl [2 ]
Platteel, Tamara N. [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Inst Infect & Immun, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Publ Hlth,Dept Internal Med Infect Dis, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Univ Antwerp, Dept Family Med & Populat Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Primary & Long Term Care, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Maastricht Univ, Dept Family Med, CAPHRI, Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[6] Univ Utrecht, Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, Dept Gen Practice & Nursing Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Author qualitative research; cystitis; general practice; decision making; shared; urinary tract infections; primary health care; primary care nursing; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTION; PRIMARY-CARE; PATIENT; WOMEN; PLACEBO;
D O I
10.3399/BJGPO.2023.0179
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Cystitis is commonly treated with antibiotics, although non- antibiotic options could be considered for healthy non- pregnant women. Shared decision making (SDM) can be used in cystitis management to discuss the various treatment options but is not frequently applied in general practice. Aim: To identify barriers and facilitators for applying SDM in cystitis management in general practice. Design & setting: Qualitative explorative research in general practice with healthcare professionals (HCPs; GPs and GP assistants) and healthy non- pregnant women with a recent history of cystitis (patients). Method: Individual semi- structured interviews were conducted between May and October 2022. We applied a combination of thematic and framework analysis. Results: Ten GPs, seven GP assistants, and 15 patients were interviewed. We identified the following three main barriers and one key facilitator: (1) applying SDM is deemed inefficient; (2) HCPs assume that patients expect antibiotic treatment and some HCPs consider non- antibiotic treatment inferior; (3) patients are largely unaware of the various non- antibiotic treatment options for cystitis; and (4) HCPs recognise some benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management, including reduced antibiotic use and improved patient empowerment, and patients appreciate involvement in treatment decisions, but preferences for SDM vary. Conclusion: SDM is infrequently applied in cystitis treatment in general practice owing to the current focus on efficient cystitis management that omits patient contact, HCPs' perceptions, and patient unawareness. Nevertheless, both HCPs and patients recognise the long- term benefits of applying SDM in cystitis management. Our findings facilitate the development of tailored interventions to increase the application of SDM, which should be co- created with HCPs and patients, and fit into the current efficient cystitis management.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Shared decision making in consultations for hypertension: Qualitative study in general practice
    Johnson, Rachel
    Turner, Katrina
    Feder, Gene
    Cramer, Helen
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2021, 24 (03) : 917 - 929
  • [2] Shared decision making for women with uncomplicated Cystitis in Primary Care in the Netherlands: a qualitative interview study
    van Horrik, Tessa M. Z. X. K.
    Laan, Bart J.
    van Seben, Rosanne
    Rodenburg, Gerda
    Heeregrave, Edwin J.
    Geerlings, Suzanne E.
    BMC PRIMARY CARE, 2022, 23 (01):
  • [3] Shared decision making for women with uncomplicated Cystitis in Primary Care in the Netherlands: a qualitative interview study
    Tessa M.Z.X.K. van Horrik
    Bart J. Laan
    Rosanne van Seben
    Gerda Rodenburg
    Edwin J. Heeregrave
    Suzanne E. Geerlings
    BMC Primary Care, 23
  • [4] Shared decision-making performance of general practice residents: an observational study combining observer, resident, and patient perspectives
    Baghus, Anouk
    Giroldi, Esther
    van Geel, Jasper
    Leferink, Arthur
    van de Pol, Marjolein H. J.
    Sanders, Ariette
    Dielissen, Patrick W.
    Bisschop, Isabella
    Pieterse, Arwen H.
    Muris, Jean W. M.
    Timmerman, Angelique A.
    van der Weijden, Trudy
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2024, 41 (01) : 50 - 59
  • [5] Shared decision-making in general practice: an observational study comparing 2007 with 2015
    Meijers, Maartje C.
    Noordman, Janneke
    Spreeuwenberg, Peter
    Hartman, Tim C. Olde
    van Dulmen, Sandra
    FAMILY PRACTICE, 2019, 36 (03) : 357 - 364
  • [6] Perspectives of residents on shared decision making in medication management: A qualitative study
    Sawan, Mouna J.
    Jeon, Yun-Hee
    Hilmer, Sarah N.
    Chen, Timothy F.
    INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2022, 34 (10) : 929 - 939
  • [7] Urine analysis and decision-making on cystitis in general practice
    Bolann, BJ
    Thue, G
    Sandberg, S
    SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL & LABORATORY INVESTIGATION, 2004, 64 (08): : 729 - 735
  • [8] Implementing and Evaluating Shared Decision Making in Oncology Practice
    Kane, Heather L.
    Halpern, Michael T.
    Squiers, Linda B.
    Treiman, Katherine A.
    McCormack, Lauren A.
    CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2014, 64 (06) : 377 - 388
  • [9] General practitioners' decision making managing uncomplicated urinary tract infections in women: a qualitative study
    Kurotschka, Peter K.
    Hemkeppler, Juliane
    Gierszewski, David
    Ghirotto, Luca
    Gagyor, Ildiko
    BJGP OPEN, 2024, 8 (03)
  • [10] General practitioners' clinical practice on the management of cystitis in Normandy, France: A clinical vignettes-based study
    Beaurain, Claire
    Thibon, Pascal
    Fiaux, Elise
    Piednoir, Emmanuel
    Magnani, Claude
    Caron, Francois
    Verdon, Renaud
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (02) : 421 - 428