Rhizobia mutualists contribute to phylogenetic clustering and legume community assembly globally

被引:0
作者
Simonsen, Anna K. [1 ,2 ]
Dinnage, Russell [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Miami, FL 33199 USA
[2] Florida Int Univ, Inst Environm, Miami, FL 33199 USA
基金
澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
biogeography and macroecology; determinants of plant community diversity and structure; global change ecology; invasion ecology; legume; nitrogen-fixation; rhizobia; symbiosis; EVOLUTIONARY HISTORY; LIMITING SIMILARITY; DIVERSITY; BIODIVERSITY; NULL; BIOGEOGRAPHY; SHAPES; MODELS; PLANTS; TREE;
D O I
10.1111/1365-2745.70015
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Mutualistic interactions are increasingly recognized as playing an important role in community assembly. We hypothesize that mutualisms can influence the amount of phylogenetic diversity within plant communities during community assembly. We test this hypothesis by comparing phylogenetic diversity among clades in the Fabaceae (i.e. legumes), which has repeatedly gained and lost the ability to form mutualistic symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing bacteria (rhizobia). Here, we analysed global distribution data for both native and introduced legumes and quantified the impact of gains and losses of the rhizobia symbiosis trait on the phylogenetic structure of regional legume assemblages. Generally, we find that legume assemblages exhibit evidence of phylogenetic clustering-lower phylogenetic diversity than expected, suggesting that species assembly is generally constrained by conservation of traits related to assembly. More importantly, by leveraging naturally existing plant trait variation in the ability to form rhizobial symbiosis, we were able to estimate the contribution of rhizobia mutualism to global patterns of phylogenetic clustering. Specifically, we found relatively higher phylogenetic diversity in regional native legume assemblages that contain higher proportions of non-rhizobial native legumes. Moreover, the probability of plant species being recorded as introduced species in a new range is negatively related to phylogenetic distance to its nearest native relative in the new range, but importantly, this effect is significantly weaker for species that are not symbiotic with rhizobia. Together, these results suggest that rhizobia mutualism contributes to (1) the patterns of phylogenetic clustering for native legume communities and (2) the assembly of communities of legumes through the introduction and establishment of alien species. Synthesis. Our data support the hypothesis that the probability of mutualistic plant species establishing in a community is more strongly constrained by the phylogenetic conservation of compatible locally available mutualistic partners than is true for related species that do not form mutualistic symbiosis. In addition, this constraint occurs both in the native and introduced plant ranges. Our findings highlight the significant role mutualism (in the form of bacterial symbiosis with nitrogen-fixing rhizobia) can play in constraining phylogenetic diversity in legume communities across the globe. Our study advances community assembly theory and underscores the importance of considering mutualism in the conservation and restoration of phylogenetic diversity.
引用
收藏
页码:974 / 987
页数:14
相关论文
共 82 条
[1]   LIMITING SIMILARITY AND FORM OF COMPETITION COEFFICIENT [J].
ABRAMS, P .
THEORETICAL POPULATION BIOLOGY, 1975, 8 (03) :356-375
[2]   Mutualist-mediated effects on species' range limits across large geographic scales [J].
Afkhami, Michelle E. ;
McIntyre, Patrick J. ;
Strauss, Sharon Y. .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2014, 17 (10) :1265-1273
[3]   Rhizobia in the field [J].
Amarger, N .
ADVANCES IN AGRONOMY, VOL 73, 2001, 73 :109-168
[4]   Specificity in Legume-Rhizobia Symbioses [J].
Andrews, Mitchell ;
Andrews, Morag E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR SCIENCES, 2017, 18 (04)
[5]   Evolutionary history shapes patterns of mutualistic benefit in Acacia-rhizobial interactions [J].
Barrett, Luke G. ;
Zee, Peter C. ;
Bever, James D. ;
Miller, Joseph T. ;
Thrall, Peter H. .
EVOLUTION, 2016, 70 (07) :1473-1485
[6]  
Bascompte J., 2007, Plantanimal mutualistic networks : The architecture of biodiversity
[7]  
Bates D., 2014, arXiv stat.CO
[8]   Modeling: Neutral, Null, and Baseline [J].
Bausman, William C. .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 2018, 85 (04) :594-616
[9]   POSITIVE INTERACTIONS IN COMMUNITIES [J].
BERTNESS, MD ;
CALLAWAY, R .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 1994, 9 (05) :191-193
[10]   OUR CURRENT UNDERSTANDING OF MUTUALISM [J].
BRONSTEIN, JL .
QUARTERLY REVIEW OF BIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (01) :31-51