Are school-based violence prevention interventions inclusive and effective for children with disabilities? A systematic review of global evidence

被引:0
作者
Eldred, Emily [1 ]
Devries, Karen [1 ]
Zinke-Allmang, Anja [2 ]
Mallick, Rizwana [3 ]
Mughis, Waliyah [4 ,5 ]
Banks, Lena Morgon [1 ]
Bhatia, Amiya [2 ]
机构
[1] London Sch Hyg & Trop Med, Fac Epidemiol & Populat Hlth, Keppel St, London WC1E 7HT, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Social Policy & Intervent, Oxford, England
[3] Univ Cape Town, Childrens Inst, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Aga Khan Univ, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Aga Khan Univ, Brain & Mind Inst, Karachi, Pakistan
关键词
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; REDUCING PHYSICAL VIOLENCE; MENTAL-HEALTH; SEXUAL-ABUSE; VICTIMIZATION; STUDENTS; ADOLESCENTS; CHILDHOOD; CLASSROOM; PROGRAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.103060
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Children with disabilities are twice as likely to experience violence compared to peers without disabilities. While evaluations of school-based interventions targeting the prevention of violence against children in schools are growing in number, it is unclear whether these interventions are inclusive of, or effective for, children with disabilities. Methods We searched six databases (Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase, Global Health, PsycINFO, Web of Science) and utilised professional networks to identify systematic reviews which included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of school-based violence prevention interventions up to May 2024. Once we identified our fi nal sample of systematic reviews (n = 29) we hand searched the included papers within these reviews and included all RCTs of school-based violence prevention interventions. We applied criteria to assess disability inclusion and conducted a narrative synthesis of study characteristics, adaptations to intervention and/or data collection design, and effect estimates. We assessed risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. This review was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42023463384). Findings We identified 160 articles of school-based violence prevention interventions. Of these, 13 articles reporting on 10 trials (8.13%) explicitly mentioned disability: 3/10 trials reported on the magnitude of intervention effects among children with disabilities; 4/10 trials mentioned adaptations to research or intervention design to include children with disabilities; 6/10 trials mentioned disability as part of the sample characteristics but did not report further sub-group analysis. 3 trials were effective in reducing violence in schools for children with disabilities, with risk of bias ranging from ' low ' (n = 1) to ' some concerns' (n = 2). Interpretation Despite growing evidence on how to prevent school violence, there is limited research on the effect of such interventions for children with disabilities. There is a need for future evaluations to stratify effects by disability, conduct disability-inclusive research, and tailor interventions for children with disabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [1] Adapting an anti-bullying programme for UK special schools
    Badger, Julia R.
    Bowes, Lucy
    Salmivalli, Christina
    Hastings, Richard P.
    [J]. SUPPORT FOR LEARNING, 2023, 38 (04) : 178 - 182
  • [2] "If he could speak, he would be able to point out who does those things to him" : Experiences of violence and access to child protection among children with disabilities in Uganda and Malawi
    Banks, Lena Morgon
    Kelly, Susan A.
    Kyegombe, Nambusi
    Kuper, Hannah
    Devries, Karen
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (09):
  • [3] School-based interventions to reduce teacher violence against children: a systematic review
    Baumgarten, Ella
    Simmonds, Mark
    Mason-Jones, Amanda J.
    [J]. CHILD ABUSE REVIEW, 2023, 32 (04)
  • [4] Re-orientating systematic reviews to rigorously examine what works, for whom and how: Example of a realist systematic review of school-based prevention of dating and gender violence
    Bonell, Chris
    Taylor, Bruce
    Berry, Vashti
    Priolo Filho, Sidnei R.
    Rizzo, Andrew
    Farmer, Caroline
    Hagell, Ann
    Young, Honor
    Orr, Noreen
    Shaw, Naomi
    Chollet, Annah
    Kiff, Fraizer
    Rigby, Emma
    Melendez-Torres, G. J.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2023, 14 (04) : 582 - 595
  • [5] Defining equity in health
    Braveman, P
    Gruskin, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2003, 57 (04) : 254 - 258
  • [6] 'Being disabled' as an exclusion criterion for clinical trials: a scoping review
    Camanni, Guido
    Ciccone, Ornella
    Lepri, Alessandro
    Tinarelli, Chiara
    Bedetti, Chiara
    Cicuttin, Sandra
    Murgia, Nicola
    Elisei, Sandro
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2023, 8 (11):
  • [7] Teacher Consultation and Coaching Within Mental Health Practice: Classroom and Child Effects in Urban Elementary Schools
    Cappella, Elise
    Hamre, Bridget K.
    Kim, Ha Yeon
    Henry, David B.
    Frazier, Stacy L.
    Atkins, Marc S.
    Schoenwald, Sonja K.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONSULTING AND CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 80 (04) : 597 - 610
  • [8] Celik P., 2024, International Journal of Educational Research Open, V7, P100348, DOI [10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100348, DOI 10.1016/J.IJEDRO.2024.100348]
  • [9] Cissner A.B., 2014, Building healthy teen relationships: An evaluation of the Fourth R curriculum with middle school students in the Bronx
  • [10] Psychological Intervention and Prevention Programs for Child and Adolescent Exposure to Community Violence: A Systematic Review
    Darawshy, Neveen Ali-Saleh
    Gewirtz, Abigail
    Marsalis, Scott
    [J]. CLINICAL CHILD AND FAMILY PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 23 (03) : 365 - 378