No Difference in External Rotation Loss After Isolated Bankart Repair, Remplissage, or Latarjet: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

被引:1
作者
Gonzalez-Morgado, Diego [1 ,2 ]
Ardebol, Javier [1 ]
Noble, Matthew B. [1 ]
Galasso, Lisa A. [1 ]
Menendez, Mariano E. [1 ]
Denard, Patrick J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Oregon Shoulder Inst, 2780 E Barnett Rd,Suite 200, Medford, OR 97504 USA
[2] Univ Autonoma Barcelona, Hosp Univ Vall dHebron, Orthopaed Surg Dept, Barcelona, Spain
关键词
Bankart; remplissage; Latarjet; external rotation; systematic review; meta-analysis; ANTERIOR SHOULDER INSTABILITY; HILL-SACHS LESION; GLENOID BONE LOSS; ARTHROSCOPIC BANKART; GLENOHUMERAL INSTABILITY; FUNCTIONAL OUTCOMES; CORACOID TRANSFER; MANAGEMENT; MULTICENTER; STABILITY;
D O I
10.1177/03635465241241825
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Despite the effectiveness of remplissage in reducing instability recurrence, debate remains about the loss of external rotation (ER) after this procedure.Purpose: To compare the loss of ER after primary isolated arthroscopic Bankart repair alone (BR), Bankart with remplissage (REMP), and Latarjet (LAT) procedures.Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 3.Methods: A literature search of 4 databases was conducted to identify comparative studies reporting ER after BR, REMP, or LAT. ER loss with the arm at side was collected, along with postoperative Rowe score, return to previous sport level, instability recurrence, reintervention, and noninstability complications. Dichotomous variables were assessed using odds ratios with 95% CIs, and continuous variables were analyzed using mean differences (MDs) with 95% CIs. A random-effects meta-analysis was used for continuous outcomes and dichotomous outcomes.Results: In total, 27 studies were included, consisting of 2100 patients: 824 in BR, 378 in REMP, and 898 in LAT groups. The mean ER loss was 6.8 degrees +/- 11 degrees after BR, 9.3 degrees +/- 12.6 degrees after REMP, and 0.8 degrees +/- 20.4 degrees after LAT. Comparing REMP and BR, the MD was 5.9 degrees (P = .13); between REMP and LAT, the MD was 9.6 degrees (P = .17). For Rowe scores, the MD was 3.46 (P = .49) between REMP and BR and 0.24 (P = .9) between REMP and LAT. Odds ratios for return to previous sport level were 1.08 (P = .84) for REMP versus BR and 1.62 (P = .09) for REMP versus LAT. Regarding instability recurrence, the odds ratio was 6.67 (P = .04) for REMP versus BR and 1.43 (P = .48) for REMP versus LAT. The odds ratio for reoperation for BR was 7.69 (P = .05) compared with REMP, and the odds ratio for complications for LAT was 6.25 (P = .02) compared with REMP.Conclusion: Remplissage reduces instability recurrence compared with isolated Bankart repair without any statistically significant difference in postoperative ER deficit. Remplissage may reduce the risk of reoperation compared with Latarjet with no difference in postoperative ER deficit or recurrence.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 500
页数:8
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [41] Miyamoto Ryosuke, 2017, Open Orthop J, V11, P1268, DOI 10.2174/1874325001711011268
  • [42] Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for anterior instability of the shoulder
    Mizuno, Naoko
    Denard, Patrick J.
    Raiss, Patric
    Melis, Barbara
    Walch, Gilles
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2014, 23 (11) : 1691 - 1699
  • [43] Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Using Knot-Tying Versus Knotless Suture Anchors: Is There a Difference?
    Ng, Dennis Zhaowen
    Kumar, V. Prem
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (04) : 422 - 427
  • [44] Functional outcomes after open versus arthroscopic Latarjet procedure: A prospective comparative study
    Nourissat, G.
    Neyton, L.
    Metais, P.
    Clavert, P.
    Villain, B.
    Haeni, D.
    Walch, G.
    Lafosse, L.
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2016, 102 (08) : S277 - S279
  • [45] The Effect of the Remplissage Procedure on Shoulder Range of Motion: A Cadaveric Study
    Omi, Rei
    Hooke, Alexander W.
    Zhao, Kristin D.
    Matsuhashi, Tomoya
    Goto, Akira
    Yamamoto, Nobuyuki
    Sperling, John W.
    Steinmann, Scott P.
    Itoi, Eiji
    An, Kai-Nan
    [J]. ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2014, 30 (02) : 178 - 187
  • [46] Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews
    Ouzzani M.
    Hammady H.
    Fedorowicz Z.
    Elmagarmid A.
    [J]. Systematic Reviews, 5 (1)
  • [47] A comparative study on use of two versus three double-loaded suture anchors in arthroscopic Bankart repair
    Ozdemir, Bulent
    Akpinar, Sercan
    Cinar, Bekir Murat
    [J]. JOINT DISEASES AND RELATED SURGERY, 2021, 32 (01) : 108 - 114
  • [48] Outcomes of Arthroscopic Bankart Repair in Collision Versus Noncollision Athletes
    Petrera, Massimo
    Dwyer, Tim
    Tsuji, Matthew R. S.
    Theodoropoulos, John S.
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2013, 36 (05) : E621 - E626
  • [49] Diagnosis and Management of Traumatic Anterior Shoulder Instability
    Provencher, Matthew T.
    Midtgaard, Kaare S.
    Owens, Brett D.
    Tokish, John M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGEONS, 2021, 29 (02) : E51 - E61
  • [50] Do Techniques for Hill-Sachs Remplissage Matter in Terms of Functional and Radiological Outcomes?
    Pulatkan, Anil
    Kapicioglu, Mehmet
    Ucan, Vahdet
    Masai, Mustafa Ngeiywo
    Ozdemir, Bulent
    Akpinar, Sercan
    Bilsel, Kerem
    [J]. ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (06)