Technopessimism in the Spanish Print Media in the Public Debate on the Social Impact of Artificial Intelligence

被引:0
作者
Gonzalez-Arias, Cristian [1 ,2 ]
Lopez-Garcia, Xose [2 ]
机构
[1] Pontificia Univ Catolica Valparaiso, Inst Literatura & Ciencias Lenguaje, Valparaiso, Chile
[2] Univ Santiago de Compostela, Fac Ciencias Comunicac, Santiago De Compostela, Spain
来源
AUSTRAL COMUNICACION | 2024年 / 14卷 / 01期
关键词
Artificial Intelligence; Technoethics; Ethical dilemmas; Public debate; Media coverage; Technopessimism; JOURNALISM;
D O I
10.26422/aucom.2025.1401.gon
中图分类号
G2 [信息与知识传播];
学科分类号
05 ; 0503 ;
摘要
The rapid evolution of Artificial Intelligence (AI) has intensified public debate about its social implications. In this context, journalistic coverage of technological advancements plays a key role in shaping public opinion. As a mediator of public debate, the press has the responsibility to provide critical and balanced coverage of these important issues. This study analyzes how the media represents ethical concerns regarding the social effects of AI. Based on a corpus of 912 articles from 12 Spanish newspapers, the topics and voices shaping the debate over a one-month period, five months after the launch of ChatGPT, were identified. The results reveal the main discourses organizing public debate, highlighting a predominant technopessimist perspective that emphasizes the potential risks AI poses to humanity and the urgent need to establish ethical standards. Additionally, it shows that large tech companies have played a prominent role in the debate, acting not only as key players in technological development but also as the main voices driving the discussion, in contrast to the limited participation of political, governmental, and civil society actors. While no systematic differences were observed between the newspapers analyzed, some differences in positioning emerged when comparing traditional media with digital- native outlets.
引用
收藏
页数:35
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
Arfuch Leonor., 2002, El espacio biografico: dilemas de la subjetividad contemporanea
[2]  
Bakhtin Mikhail., 1984, PROBLEMS DOSTOEVSKYS
[3]  
Barcelo-Ugarte T., 2021, News Media Innovation Reconsidered: Ethics and Values in a Creative Reconstruction of Journalism, P138, DOI [10.1002/9781119706519, DOI 10.1002/9781119706519]
[4]   What to expect when you're expecting robots: Futures, expectations, and pseudo-artificial general intelligence in UK news [J].
Brennen, J. Scott ;
Howard, Philip N. ;
Nielsen, Rasmus K. .
JOURNALISM, 2022, 23 (01) :22-38
[5]   The AI doctor will see you know: assessing the framing of AI in news coverage [J].
Bunz, Mercedes ;
Braghieri, Marco .
AI & SOCIETY, 2022, 37 (01) :9-22
[6]  
Charaudeau P., 2003, El discurso de la informacion: la construccion del espejo social
[7]  
Crepel M., 2022, Reseaux, V2-3, P129, DOI DOI 10.3917/RES.232.0129
[8]   Data Journalism Beyond Technological Determinism [J].
de-Lima-Santos, Mathias-Felipe ;
Mesquita, Lucia .
JOURNALISM STUDIES, 2021, 22 (11) :1416-1435
[9]   Disinformation, social media, bots, and astroturfing: the fourth wave of digital democracy [J].
Garcia-Orosa, Berta .
PROFESIONAL DE LA INFORMACION, 2021, 30 (06)
[10]  
Gonzalez Arias Cristian, 2024, HarvardDataverse, V1, DOI 10.7910/DVN/5OHWHV