Noninvasive estimation of central blood pressure through fluid-structure interaction modeling

被引:0
|
作者
Wu, Peishuo [1 ]
Zhu, Chi [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ, Dept Mech & Engn Sci, State Key Lab Turbulence & Complex Syst, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China
[2] Peking Univ, Nanchang Innovat Inst, Nanchang 330008, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fluid structure interaction; Central blood pressure; Transfer function; Pulse wave; Peripheral blood pressure; CENTRAL AORTIC PRESSURE; ARTERIAL-HYPERTENSION; CARDIOVASCULAR EVENTS; UPPER-LIMB; FLOW; WAVES; PULSE; HEMODYNAMICS; HEALTHY; STIFFNESS;
D O I
10.1007/s10237-024-01916-5
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Central blood pressure (cBP) is considered a superior indicator of cardiovascular fitness than brachial blood pressure (bBP). Even though bBP is easy to measure noninvasively, it is usually higher than cBP due to pulse wave amplification, characterized by the gradual increase in peak systolic pressure during pulse wave propagation. In this study, we aim to develop an individualized transfer function that can accurately estimate cBP from bBP. We first construct a three-dimensional, patient-specific model of the upper limb arterial system using fluid-structure interaction simulations, incorporating variable material properties and complex boundary conditions. Then, we develop an analytical brachial-aortic transfer function based on novel solutions for compliant vessels. The accuracy of this transfer function is successfully validated against numerical simulation results, which effectively reproduce pulse wave propagation and amplification, with key hemodynamic parameters falling within the range of clinical measurements. Further analysis of the transfer function reveals that cBP is a linear combination of bBP and aortic flow rate in the frequency domain, with the coefficients determined by vessel geometry, material properties, and boundary conditions. Additionally, bBP primarily contributes to the steady component of cBP, while the aortic flow rate is responsible for the pulsatile component. Furthermore, local sensitivity analysis indicates that the lumen radius is the most influential parameter in accurately estimating cBP. Although not directly applicable clinically, the proposed transfer function enhances understanding of the underlying physics-highlighting the importance of aortic flow and lumen radius-and can guide the development of more practical transfer functions.
引用
收藏
页码:423 / 439
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] On a Partitioned Strong Coupling Algorithm for Modeling Fluid-Structure Interaction
    He, Tao
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPLIED MECHANICS, 2015, 7 (02)
  • [42] Fluid-Structure Interaction Modeling of Elastohydrodynamically Lubricated Line Contacts
    Singh, Kushagra
    Sadeghi, Farshid
    Russell, Thomas
    Lorenz, Steven J.
    Peterson, Wyatt
    Villarreal, Jaret
    Jinmon, Takumi
    JOURNAL OF TRIBOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 2021, 143 (09):
  • [43] Modeling fluid-structure interaction in a direct write manufacturing process
    Desai, Salil
    Lovell, Michael
    JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 212 (10) : 2031 - 2040
  • [44] Fluid-structure interaction of blood flow around a vein valve
    Hajati, Zahra
    Moghanlou, Farhad Sadegh
    Vajdi, Mohammad
    Razavi, Seyed Esmail
    Matin, Somaieh
    BIOIMPACTS, 2020, 10 (03) : 169 - 175
  • [45] A hybridizable discontinuous Galerkin method for modeling fluid-structure interaction
    Sheldona, Jason P.
    Miller, Scott T.
    Pitt, Jonathan S.
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTATIONAL PHYSICS, 2016, 326 : 91 - 114
  • [46] Fluid-structure interaction analysis method for pressure compensating emitter
    Wei, Z. (zywei@mail.xjtu.edu.cn), 2013, Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (29): : 30 - 36
  • [47] MODELING OF ILIAC ARTERY ANEURYSM USING FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION
    Sabooni, Hatef
    Hassani, Kamran
    Bahraseman, Hamidreza Ghasemi
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2015, 15 (01)
  • [48] CONTROLLABILITY OF A SIMPLIFIED MODEL OF FLUID-STRUCTURE INTERACTION
    Ervedoza, S.
    Vanninathan, M.
    ESAIM-CONTROL OPTIMISATION AND CALCULUS OF VARIATIONS, 2014, 20 (02) : 547 - 575
  • [49] Fluid-structure interaction analysis of flexible turbomachinery
    Campbell, R. L.
    Paterson, E. G.
    JOURNAL OF FLUIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2011, 27 (08) : 1376 - 1391
  • [50] An Eulerian approach for fluid-structure interaction problems
    Morinishi, Koji
    Fukui, Tomohiro
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2012, 65 : 92 - 98