Predicting Calcein Release from Ultrasound-Targeted Liposomes: A Comparative Analysis of Random Forest and Support Vector Machine

被引:2
作者
Shomope, Ibrahim [1 ]
Percival, Kelly M. [1 ]
Jabbar, Nabil M. Abdel [1 ]
Husseini, Ghaleb A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Amer Univ Sharjah, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Sharjah 26666, U Arab Emirates
[2] Amer Univ Sharjah, Coll Arts & Sci, Mat Sci & Engn Program, POB 26666, Sharjah, U Arab Emirates
关键词
artificial intelligence; calcein; drug delivery; drug release; machine learning; power density; random forest; support vector machine; ultrasound; DRUG-DELIVERY; NEURAL-NETWORKS; TRIGGERED DRUG; NANOPARTICLES; IDENTIFICATION; MICROBUBBLES; NANOCARRIERS; FORMULATION; MICELLES; AFFINITY;
D O I
10.1177/15330338241296725
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The type of algorithm employed to predict drug release from liposomes plays an important role in affecting the accuracy. In recent years, Machine Learning (ML) has shown potential for modeling complex drug delivery systems and predicting drug release dynamics with a greater degree of precision. In this regard, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) are two ML algorithms that have been extensively applied in various biomedical and drug delivery contexts. Yet, direct comparisons of their predictive accuracy in modeling ultrasound-triggered drug release from liposomes remain limited. Existing studies predominantly focus on drug release under static conditions or with limited external stimuli rather than the dynamic, nonlinear responses observed under ultrasound exposure.Objective This study presents a comparative analysis of RF and SVM for predicting calcein release from ultrasound-triggered, targeted liposomes under varied low-frequency ultrasound (LFUS) power densities (6.2, 9, and 10 mW/cm2).Methods Liposomes loaded with calcein and targeted with seven different moieties (cRGD, estrone, folate, Herceptin, hyaluronic acid, lactobionic acid, and transferrin) were synthesized using the thin-film hydration method. The liposomes were characterized using Dynamic Light Scattering and Bicinchoninic Acid assays. Extensive data collection and preprocessing were performed. RF and SVM models were trained and evaluated using mean absolute error (MAE), mean squared error (MSE), coefficient of determination (R-2), and the a20 index as performance metrics.Results RF consistently outperformed SVM, achieving R2 scores above 0.96 across all power densities, particularly excelling at higher power densities and indicating a strong correlation with the actual data.Conclusion RF outperforms SVM in drug release prediction, though both show strengths and apply based on specific prediction needs.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 83 条
  • [71] Vapnik Vladimir, 1999, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, P1
  • [72] Release of 5-fluorouracil from thermosensitive magnetoliposomes induced by an electromagnetic field
    Viroonchatapan, E
    Sato, H
    Ueno, M
    Adachi, I
    Tazawa, K
    Horikoshi, I
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE, 1997, 46 (03) : 263 - 271
  • [73] Machine learning and data mining frameworks for predicting drug response in cancer: An overview and a novel in silico screening process based on association rule mining
    Vougas, Konstantinos
    Sakellaropoulos, Theodore
    Kotsinas, Athanassios
    Foukas, George-Romanos P.
    Ntargaras, Andreas
    Koinis, Filippos
    Polyzos, Alexander
    Myrianthopoulos, Vassilios
    Zhou, Hua
    Narang, Sonali
    Georgoulias, Vassilis
    Alexopoulos, Leonidas
    Aifantis, Iannis
    Townsend, Paul A.
    Sfikakis, Petros
    Fitzgerald, Rebecca
    Thanos, Dimitris
    Bartek, Jiri
    Petty, Russell
    Tsirigos, Aristotelis
    Gorgoulis, Vassilis G.
    [J]. PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2019, 203
  • [74] A comparative study of family-specific protein-ligand complex affinity prediction based on random forest approach
    Wang, Yu
    Guo, Yanzhi
    Kuang, Qifan
    Pu, Xuemei
    Ji, Yue
    Zhang, Zhihang
    Li, Menglong
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2015, 29 (04) : 349 - 360
  • [75] Top 10 algorithms in data mining
    Wu, Xindong
    Kumar, Vipin
    Quinlan, J. Ross
    Ghosh, Joydeep
    Yang, Qiang
    Motoda, Hiroshi
    McLachlan, Geoffrey J.
    Ng, Angus
    Liu, Bing
    Yu, Philip S.
    Zhou, Zhi-Hua
    Steinbach, Michael
    Hand, David J.
    Steinberg, Dan
    [J]. KNOWLEDGE AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS, 2008, 14 (01) : 1 - 37
  • [76] Cancer nanomedicine: from targeted delivery to combination therapy
    Xu, Xiaoyang
    Ho, William
    Zhang, Xueqing
    Bertrand, Nicolas
    Farokhzad, Omid
    [J]. TRENDS IN MOLECULAR MEDICINE, 2015, 21 (04) : 223 - 232
  • [77] Prediction of drug-target interaction by integrating diverse heterogeneous information source with multiple kernel learning and clustering methods
    Yan, Xiao-Ying
    Zhang, Shao-Wu
    He, Chang-Run
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY, 2019, 78 : 460 - 467
  • [78] Design of liposomes containing photopolymerizable phospholipids for triggered release of contents
    Yavlovich, Amichai
    Singh, Alok
    Tarasov, Sergey
    Capala, Jacek
    Blumenthal, Robert
    Puri, Anu
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THERMAL ANALYSIS AND CALORIMETRY, 2009, 98 (01) : 97 - 104
  • [79] Synthesis and characterization of phase shift dextran stabilized nanodroplets for ultrasound-induced cancer therapy: A novel nanobiotechnology approach
    Zamani, Rashad
    Bizari, Davood
    Heiat, Mohammad
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY, 2022, 350 : 17 - 23
  • [80] Nanoparticles in medicine: Therapeutic applications and developments
    Zhang, L.
    Gu, F. X.
    Chan, J. M.
    Wang, A. Z.
    Langer, R. S.
    Farokhzad, O. C.
    [J]. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 2008, 83 (05) : 761 - 769