The impact of US political decisions on renewable and fossil energy companies in the era of the Paris Agreement

被引:7
作者
Gong, Xu [1 ]
Fu, Chengbo [2 ]
Li, Huijing [3 ]
Pirabi, Mansoor [2 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, Xiamen, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Northern British Columbia, Quesnel, BC, Canada
[3] Nanjing Agr Univ, Nanjing 210095, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
US political decisions; Paris Agreement; Renewable energy; Fossil energy; TOPSIS model; Financial ratios; Climate change; Energy sector; Sustainability; WITHDRAWAL; U.S;
D O I
10.1016/j.frl.2024.106165
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This study explores the complex relationship between U.S. political decisions and the financial performance of renewable and fossil energy companies under the Paris Agreement. Employing the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) model and financial ratios, this study spans six distinct temporal phases, beginning with the anticipation of the Paris Agreement negotiations (2013-2015) and culminating in the recommitment of the United States to the Agreement under President Biden's administration (2020-2021). Our findings provide compelling insights into the dynamic interplay between politics and finance in the energy sector. Notably, the average TOPSIS scores for renewable energy companies showed a substantial 6.05% increase for the period leading up to the United States' formal entry into the Paris Agreement as a result of anticipation and global consensus building. Conversely, the average TOPSIS scores exhibited a significant 7.4% decline for the period when President Trump announced the United States' withdrawal from the Agreement (2016-2018). These results highlight the profound and lasting impact of political decisions. Our study provides valuable insights into the complex dynamics between political choices and the financial success of energy companies, thereby offering a holistic view of the evolving energy landscape in the era of climate change and global cooperation.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Al-Nasser N. M., 2014, International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research (IJMSR), V2, P1
  • [2] The impact of financial development and geopolitical risk on renewable energy consumption: evidence from emerging markets
    Alsagr, Naif
    van Hemmen, Stefan
    [J]. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2021, 28 (20) : 25906 - 25919
  • [3] Bernabeu A.G., 2015, Rect@: Rev. Electron. Comun. Trabajos ASEPUMA, V16, P13
  • [4] Climate change exposure, shareholder wealth, and the adoption of the Paris agreement: A text-based approach
    Chatjuthamard, Pattanaporn
    Singh, Simran
    Jiraporn, Pornsit
    Lee, Sang Mook
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2024, 94
  • [5] The impacts of U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement on the carbon emission space and mitigation cost of China, EU, and Japan under the constraints of the global carbon emission space
    Dai Han-Cheng
    Zhang Hai-Bin
    Wang Wen-Tao
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CLIMATE CHANGE RESEARCH, 2017, 8 (04) : 226 - 234
  • [6] The Paris Agreement on Climate Change: Behind Closed Doors
    Dimitrov, Radoslav S.
    [J]. GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2016, 16 (03) : 1 - 11
  • [7] Ehlers T., 2020, BIS Quarterly Review, P31
  • [8] Figueres C., 2018, Climate change is speeding up. Our response needs to be even faster
  • [9] Fu C., 2024, Digital Econ. Sustain. Dev., P1
  • [10] Goel S., 2015, FINANCIAL RATIOS