Spatial prediction of ground substrate thickness in shallow mountain area based on machine learning model

被引:0
作者
Zhu, Xiaosong [1 ]
Pei, Xiaolong [1 ]
Yang, Siqi [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Wei [1 ]
Dong, Yue [1 ]
Fang, Mengyang [2 ,3 ]
Liu, Wenjie [3 ,4 ]
Jiang, Lingxiu [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] China Geol Survey, Langfang Comprehens Survey Ctr Nat Resources, Langfang, Peoples R China
[2] China Geol Survey, Haikou Marine Geol Survey Ctr, Haikou, Peoples R China
[3] Sanya Land Sea Interface Crit Zone Field Sci Obser, Sanya, Peoples R China
[4] Hainan Univ, Sch Ecol & Environm, Haikou, Peoples R China
关键词
ground substrate; machine learning; parameter optimization; model validation; thickness prediction; SOIL DEPTH;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2024.1455124
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Introduction The thickness of ground substrate in shallow mountainous areas is a crucial indicator for substrate investigations and a key factor in evaluating substrate quality and function. Reliable data acquisition methods are essential for effective investigation.Methods This study utilizes six machine learning algorithms-Gradient Boosting Machine (GB), Random Forest (RF), AdaBoost Regressor (AB), Neural Network (NN), Support Vector Machine (SVM), and k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN)-to predict ground substrate thickness. Grid search optimization was employed to fine-tune model parameters. The models' performances were evaluated using four metrics: mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), and the coefficient of determination (R2). The optimal parameter combinations for each model were then used to calculate the spatial distribution of ground substrate thickness in the study area.Results The results indicate that after parameter optimization, all models showed significant reductions in the MSE, RMSE, and MAE, while R2 values increased substantially. Under optimal parameters, the RF model achieved an MSE of 1,589, RMSE of 39.8, MAE of 26.5, and an R2 of 0.63, with a Pearson correlation coefficient of 0.80, outperforming the other models. Therefore, parameter tuning is a necessary step in using machine learning models to predict ground substrate thickness, and the performance of all six models improved significantly after tuning. Overall, ensemble learning models provided better predictive performance than other machine learning models, with the RF model demonstrating the best accuracy and robustness.Discussion Moreover, further attention is required on the characteristics of sample data and environmental variables in machine learning-based predictions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Random forests
    Breiman, L
    [J]. MACHINE LEARNING, 2001, 45 (01) : 5 - 32
  • [2] An empirical geomorphology-based approach to the spatial prediction of soil thickness at catchment scale
    Catani, Filippo
    Segoni, Samuele
    Falorni, Giacomo
    [J]. WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
  • [3] SOIL CREEP AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF HILLSIDE SLOPES
    CULLING, WEH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOLOGY, 1963, 71 (02) : 127 - 161
  • [4] A PROCESS-BASED MODEL FOR COLLUVIAL SOIL DEPTH AND SHALLOW LANDSLIDING USING DIGITAL ELEVATION DATA
    DIETRICH, WE
    REISS, R
    HSU, ML
    MONTGOMERY, DR
    [J]. HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1995, 9 (3-4) : 383 - 400
  • [5] [董天钰 Dong Tianyu], 2023, [西北地质, Northwestern Geology], V56, P213
  • [6] Stochastic gradient boosting
    Friedman, JH
    [J]. COMPUTATIONAL STATISTICS & DATA ANALYSIS, 2002, 38 (04) : 367 - 378
  • [7] Exploring the driving forces and digital mapping of soil organic carbon using remote sensing and soil texture
    Hamzehpour, Nikou
    Shafizadeh-Moghadam, Hossein
    Valavi, Roozbeh
    [J]. CATENA, 2019, 182
  • [8] [侯红星 Hou Hongxing], 2021, [西北地质, Northwestern Geology], V54, P277
  • [9] Application and comparison of several machine learning algorithms and their integration models in regression problems
    Huang, Jui-Chan
    Ko, Kuo-Min
    Shu, Ming-Hung
    Hsu, Bi-Min
    [J]. NEURAL COMPUTING & APPLICATIONS, 2020, 32 (10) : 5461 - 5469
  • [10] [贾俊 Jia Jun], 2023, [西北地质, Northwestern Geology], V56, P239