The Cancer and Work Scale (CAWSE): Assessing Return to Work Likelihood and Employment Sustainability After Cancer

被引:1
作者
Maheu, Christine [1 ]
Singh, Mina [2 ]
Tock, Wing Lam [3 ,4 ]
Robert, Jennifer [1 ]
Vodermaier, Andrea [5 ]
Parkinson, Maureen [6 ]
Dolgoy, Naomi [7 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Ingram Sch Nursing, Montreal, PQ H3A 2M7, Canada
[2] York Univ, Sch Nursing, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[3] Ctr Hosp Univ Montreal CRCHUM, Ctr Rech, Montreal, PQ H2X 0A9, Canada
[4] Univ Montreal, Ecole Sante Publ, Dept Social & Prevent Med, Montreal, PQ H3N 1X9, Canada
[5] Univ British Columbia, Sch Populat & Publ Hlth, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[6] BC Canc, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4E6, Canada
[7] Univ Alberta, Dept Occupat Therapy, Edmonton, AB T6G 2G4, Canada
关键词
return to work; cancer; work reintegration; tool validation; oncology vocational rehabilitation; exploratory factor analysis; work sustainability; cancer survivorship; work-related barriers; employment outcomes; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; SURVIVORS; COSMIN; CHECKLIST; CLAIMANTS; TESTS;
D O I
10.3390/curroncol32030166
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Returning to and sustaining employment after cancer presents significant challenges for individuals touched by cancer (ITBC). While vocational rehabilitation and workplace accommodations are critical, existing return to work (RTW) assessments lack cancer-specific considerations, limiting their clinical and occupational utility. Purpose: This study aimed to develop and validate the Cancer and Work Scale (CAWSE), a psychometrically robust tool designed to assess RTW likelihood and employment sustainability among ITBC, while also providing avenues for targeted interventions. Methods: A two-phase cross-sectional study was conducted. Study I (n = 130) assessed content validity and construct development, leading to a refined 43-item CAWSE. Study II (n = 216) employed exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses to establish structural validity, reliability, and responsiveness. Additional validation included correlations with fatigue, cognitive difficulties, depression, and anxiety. Results: Factor analysis supported a seven-factor structure with 31 final items. The CAWSE demonstrated good internal consistency (alpha = 0.787), construct validity, and moderate responsiveness (AUC = 0.659). High sensitivity allowed for accurate identification of RTW difficulties, with an established cut-off score of 123.5 on the total CAWSE. Implications: The CAWSE fills a critical gap in oncology-specific vocational rehabilitation, offering healthcare providers a validated tool for targeted interventions to enhance RTW outcomes and long-term employment sustainability for ITBC.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   THE EUROPEAN-ORGANIZATION-FOR-RESEARCH-AND-TREATMENT-OF-CANCER QLQ-C30 - A QUALITY-OF-LIFE INSTRUMENT FOR USE IN INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL-TRIALS IN ONCOLOGY [J].
AARONSON, NK ;
AHMEDZAI, S ;
BERGMAN, B ;
BULLINGER, M ;
CULL, A ;
DUEZ, NJ ;
FILIBERTI, A ;
FLECHTNER, H ;
FLEISHMAN, SB ;
DEHAES, JCJM ;
KAASA, S ;
KLEE, M ;
OSOBA, D ;
RAZAVI, D ;
ROFE, PB ;
SCHRAUB, S ;
SNEEUW, K ;
SULLIVAN, M ;
TAKEDA, F .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1993, 85 (05) :365-376
[2]   TESTS OF SIGNIFICANCE IN FACTOR ANALYSIS [J].
Bartlett, M. S. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-STATISTICAL SECTION, 1950, 3 :77-85
[3]   Factors influencing job loss and early retirement in working men with prostate cancerfindings from the population-based Life After Prostate Cancer Diagnosis (LAPCD) study [J].
Bennett, Damien ;
Kearney, Therese ;
Donnelly, David W. ;
Downing, Amy ;
Wright, Penny ;
Wilding, Sarah ;
Wagland, Richard ;
Watson, Eila ;
Glaser, Adam ;
Gavin, Anna .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2018, 12 (05) :669-678
[4]   Death anxiety as general factor to fear of cancer recurrence [J].
Berlin, Pia ;
von Blanckenburg, Pia .
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY, 2022, 31 (09) :1527-1535
[5]   Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer [J].
Boateng, Godfred O. ;
Neilands, Torsten B. ;
Frongillo, Edward A. ;
Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R. ;
Young, Sera L. .
FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
[6]  
Borneman Tami, 2007, J Natl Compr Canc Netw, V5, P1092
[7]   The Predictive Validity of the Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy Scale for Return-to-Work Outcomes in Claimants with Musculoskeletal Disorders [J].
Brouwer, Sandra ;
Amick, Benjamin C., III ;
Lee, Hyunmi ;
Franche, Renee-Louise ;
Hogg-Johnson, Sheilah .
JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION, 2015, 25 (04) :725-732
[8]   Return to work after a cancer diagnosis: a meta-review of reviews and a meta-synthesis of recent qualitative studies [J].
Butow, Phyllis ;
Laidsaar-Powell, Rebekah ;
Konings, Stephanie ;
Lim, Chloe Yi Shing ;
Koczwara, Bogda .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2020, 14 (02) :114-134
[9]   Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients' everyday lives: a systematic review [J].
Catt, Susan ;
Starkings, Rachel ;
Shilling, Valerie ;
Fallowfield, Lesley .
JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2017, 11 (02) :211-232
[10]   Cross-cultural translation and adaptation of the Readiness for Return To Work questionnaire for Dutch cancer survivors [J].
Coenen, Pieter ;
Zegers, Amber D. ;
Stapelfeldt, Christina Malmose ;
de Maaker-Berkhof, Marianne ;
Abma, Femke ;
van Der Beek, Allard J. ;
Bultmann, Ute ;
Duijts, Saskia F. A. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2021, 30 (02)