SQUIRE-SIM (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence for SIMulation)

被引:1
|
作者
Stone, Kimberly P. [1 ]
Rutman, Lori [1 ]
Calhoun, Aaron W. [2 ,3 ]
Reid, Jennifer [1 ]
Maa, Tensing [4 ,5 ]
Bajaj, Komal [6 ]
Auerbach, Marc A. [7 ]
Cheng, Adam [8 ]
Davies, Louise [9 ,10 ]
Deutsch, Ellen [11 ]
Harwayne-Gidansky, Ilana [12 ]
Kessler, David O. [13 ]
Ogrinc, Greg [14 ]
Patterson, Mary [15 ]
Thomas, Anita [1 ]
Doughty, Cara [16 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med,Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Louisville, KY USA
[3] Norton Childrens Med Grp, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Crit Care Med,Coll Med, Columbus, OH USA
[5] NYC Hlth & Hosp Jacobi, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, NCB, New York, NY USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY USA
[7] Yale Univ, Dept Pediat & Emergency Med, New Haven, CT USA
[8] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[9] Geisel Sch Med, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH USA
[10] Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[11] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
[12] Bernard & Millie Duker Childrens Hosp, Albany Med Coll, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Crit Care Med, Albany, NY USA
[13] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Emergency Med, New York, NY USA
[14] Univ Illinois, Coll Med Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
[15] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[16] Texas Childrens Hosp, Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Div Emergency Med, Houston, TX USA
来源
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
Quality improvement; simulation methodology; simulation education; reporting guidelines; extension guidelines; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000819
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionWith increased incorporation of simulation-based methodologies into quality improvement activities, standards for reporting on simulation-specific elements in healthcare improvement research are needed.MethodsWe followed established consensus process methodology to iteratively create simulation-based extensions for SQUIRE 2.0 reporting guidelines. Initial steps involved forming a steering committee, defining the scope, and conducting premeeting activities with an expert panel of simulation and quality improvement researchers. Recommendations from the expert panel were brought to a consensus meeting where existing guidelines were reviewed and recommendations made. Steering Committee members reviewed all recommendations, reconciled differences, and made final recommendations, which were piloted by experienced simulation and quality improvement researchers.ResultsFifteen Steering Committee members, 59 experts in simulation and quality improvement research, and 86 consensus meeting attendees reviewed SQUIRE 2.0 reporting guidelines and ultimately recommended simulation-based reporting guidelines for 22 of the 41 (54%) SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Those items for which simulation-based extensions were identified were: Notes to Authors, 1 (Title), 2a (Abstract), 2b (Abstract), 4 (Introduction: Available knowledge), 5 (Introduction: Rationale), 7 and 8a & b (Methods: Context and intervention), 9a (Methods - Study of the intervention), 9b (Methods - Study of the intervention), 10a (Methods - Measures), 10b (Methods-Measures), 10c (Methods-Measures), 11b (Methods- Analysis), 12 (Methods - Ethical considerations), 13a (Results), 13e (Results), 14b (Discussion - Summary), 15a-e (Discussion - Interpretation), 16a (Discussion - Limitations), 16b (Discussion - Limitations), 17c (Discussion - Conclusions), and 17d (Discussion - Conclusions).ConclusionsWe created simulation-based extensions to SQUIRE 2.0 reporting guidelines to improve the quality and standardization of reporting on simulation-specific elements of healthcare improvement research.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Expanding Data Reporting Capacity of Free and Charitable Clinics: A Quality Improvement Project
    Sposito, Rachel S.
    Selleck, Cynthia
    JOURNAL OF DOCTORAL NURSING PRACTICE, 2020, 13 (01) : 64 - 70
  • [32] Quality Improvement With Discrete Event Simulation: A Primer for Radiologists
    Booker, Michael T.
    O'Connell, Ryan J.
    Desai, Bhushan
    Duddalwar, Vinay A.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY, 2016, 13 (04) : 417 - 423
  • [33] Why is reporting quality improvement so hard? A qualitative study in perioperative care
    Jones, Emma Leanne
    Dixon-Woods, Mary
    Martin, Graham P.
    BMJ OPEN, 2019, 9 (07):
  • [34] Documentation framework for healthcare simulation quality improvement activities
    Melanie Barlow
    Robyn Dickie
    Catherine Morse
    Donna Bonney
    Robert Simon
    Advances in Simulation, 2 (1)
  • [35] A joint leap into a future of high-quality simulation research—standardizing the reporting of simulation science
    Nick Sevdalis
    Debra Nestel
    Suzan Kardong-Edgren
    David M. Gaba
    Advances in Simulation, 1 (1)
  • [36] Completeness of reporting of quality improvement studies in neonatology is inadequate: a systematic literature survey
    Hu, Zheng Jing
    Fusch, Gerhard
    Hu, Catherine
    Wang, Jie Yi
    el Helou, Zoe
    Hassan, Muhammad Taaha
    Mbuagbaw, Lawrence
    el Helou, Salhab
    Thabane, Lehana
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2021, 10 (02)
  • [37] Structured opioid-free protocol following outpatient hypospadias repair - A prospective SQUIRE 2.0-compliant quality improvement initiative
    O'Kelly, F.
    Pokarowski, M.
    DeCotiis, K. N.
    McDonnell, C.
    Milford, K.
    Koyle, M. A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2020, 16 (05) : 647.e1 - 647.e9
  • [38] Quality Improvement Efforts in VA Community Living Centers Following Public Reporting of Performance
    Davila, Heather
    Mills, Whitney L.
    Clark, Valerie
    Hartmann, Christine W.
    Sullivan, Jennifer L.
    Mohr, David C.
    Baughman, Amy W.
    Berlowitz, Dan R.
    Pimentel, Camilla B.
    JOURNAL OF AGING & SOCIAL POLICY, 2024, 36 (01) : 118 - 140
  • [39] Quality of science and reporting of radiomics in oncologic studies: room for improvement according to radiomics quality score and TRIPOD statement
    Park, Ji Eun
    Kim, Donghyun
    Kim, Ho Sung
    Park, Seo Young
    Kim, Jung Youn
    Cho, Se Jin
    Shin, Jae Ho
    Kim, Jeong Hoon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 523 - 536
  • [40] Structured Feedback From Referring Physicians: A Novel Approach to Quality Improvement in Radiology Reporting
    Gunn, Andrew J.
    Alabre, Claude I.
    Bennett, Susan E.
    Kautzky, Mira
    Krakower, Thalia
    Palamara, Kerri
    Choy, Garry
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2013, 201 (04) : 853 - 857