SQUIRE-SIM (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence for SIMulation)

被引:1
|
作者
Stone, Kimberly P. [1 ]
Rutman, Lori [1 ]
Calhoun, Aaron W. [2 ,3 ]
Reid, Jennifer [1 ]
Maa, Tensing [4 ,5 ]
Bajaj, Komal [6 ]
Auerbach, Marc A. [7 ]
Cheng, Adam [8 ]
Davies, Louise [9 ,10 ]
Deutsch, Ellen [11 ]
Harwayne-Gidansky, Ilana [12 ]
Kessler, David O. [13 ]
Ogrinc, Greg [14 ]
Patterson, Mary [15 ]
Thomas, Anita [1 ]
Doughty, Cara [16 ]
机构
[1] Univ Washington, Seattle Childrens Hosp, Sch Med, Div Emergency Med,Dept Pediat, Seattle, WA USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Med, Dept Pediat, Louisville, KY USA
[3] Norton Childrens Med Grp, Louisville, KY USA
[4] Ohio State Univ, Nationwide Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Div Crit Care Med,Coll Med, Columbus, OH USA
[5] NYC Hlth & Hosp Jacobi, Dept Obstet & Gynecol & Womens Hlth, NCB, New York, NY USA
[6] Albert Einstein Coll Med, Bronx, NY USA
[7] Yale Univ, Dept Pediat & Emergency Med, New Haven, CT USA
[8] Univ Calgary, Alberta Childrens Hosp, Dept Pediat, Calgary, AB, Canada
[9] Geisel Sch Med, Dept Surg, Lebanon, NH USA
[10] Dartmouth Inst Hlth Policy & Clin Practice, Lebanon, NH USA
[11] Childrens Hosp Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA USA
[12] Bernard & Millie Duker Childrens Hosp, Albany Med Coll, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Crit Care Med, Albany, NY USA
[13] Columbia Univ, Vagelos Coll Phys & Surg, Dept Emergency Med, New York, NY USA
[14] Univ Illinois, Coll Med Chicago, Chicago, IL USA
[15] Univ Florida, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Gainesville, FL USA
[16] Texas Childrens Hosp, Baylor Coll Med, Dept Pediat, Div Emergency Med, Houston, TX USA
来源
SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE-JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY FOR SIMULATION IN HEALTHCARE | 2025年 / 20卷 / 02期
关键词
Quality improvement; simulation methodology; simulation education; reporting guidelines; extension guidelines; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.1097/SIH.0000000000000819
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
IntroductionWith increased incorporation of simulation-based methodologies into quality improvement activities, standards for reporting on simulation-specific elements in healthcare improvement research are needed.MethodsWe followed established consensus process methodology to iteratively create simulation-based extensions for SQUIRE 2.0 reporting guidelines. Initial steps involved forming a steering committee, defining the scope, and conducting premeeting activities with an expert panel of simulation and quality improvement researchers. Recommendations from the expert panel were brought to a consensus meeting where existing guidelines were reviewed and recommendations made. Steering Committee members reviewed all recommendations, reconciled differences, and made final recommendations, which were piloted by experienced simulation and quality improvement researchers.ResultsFifteen Steering Committee members, 59 experts in simulation and quality improvement research, and 86 consensus meeting attendees reviewed SQUIRE 2.0 reporting guidelines and ultimately recommended simulation-based reporting guidelines for 22 of the 41 (54%) SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. Those items for which simulation-based extensions were identified were: Notes to Authors, 1 (Title), 2a (Abstract), 2b (Abstract), 4 (Introduction: Available knowledge), 5 (Introduction: Rationale), 7 and 8a & b (Methods: Context and intervention), 9a (Methods - Study of the intervention), 9b (Methods - Study of the intervention), 10a (Methods - Measures), 10b (Methods-Measures), 10c (Methods-Measures), 11b (Methods- Analysis), 12 (Methods - Ethical considerations), 13a (Results), 13e (Results), 14b (Discussion - Summary), 15a-e (Discussion - Interpretation), 16a (Discussion - Limitations), 16b (Discussion - Limitations), 17c (Discussion - Conclusions), and 17d (Discussion - Conclusions).ConclusionsWe created simulation-based extensions to SQUIRE 2.0 reporting guidelines to improve the quality and standardization of reporting on simulation-specific elements of healthcare improvement research.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 80
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Mapping quality improvement education initiatives to Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence (SQUIRE) guidelines
    Lamont, Scott
    Murray, Andrew
    Tetik, Emine
    Yeo, Jiaming
    Blair, Bianca
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2023, 32 (15-16) : 5126 - 5134
  • [2] The effect of the SQUIRE (Standards of QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence) guidelines on reporting standards in the quality improvement literature: a before-and-after study
    Howell, Victoria
    Schwartz, Amanda Eva
    O'Leary, James Daniel
    McDonnell, Conor
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2015, 24 (06) : 400 - 406
  • [3] SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines from a Detailed Consensus Process
    Ogrinc, Greg
    Davies, Louise
    Goodman, Daisy
    Batalden, Paul
    Davidoff, Frank
    Stevens, David
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2015, 39 (05) : 434 - 439
  • [4] SQUIRE 2.0 (Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence): Revised Publication Guidelines From a Detailed Consensus Process
    Ogrinc, Greg
    Davies, Louise
    Goodman, Daisy
    Batalden, Paul
    Davidoff, Frank
    Stevens, David
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY, 2015, 30 (06) : 543 - 549
  • [5] Standards for QUality Improvement Reporting Excellence 2.0: revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process
    Ogrinc, Greg
    Davies, Louise
    Goodman, Daisy
    Batalden, Paul
    Davidoff, Frank
    Stevens, David
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2016, 200 (02) : 676 - 682
  • [6] Between the guidelines: SQUIRE 2.0 and advances in healthcare improvement practice and reporting
    Mosher, Hilary
    Ogrinc, Greg
    BMJ QUALITY & SAFETY, 2016, 25 (08) : 559 - 561
  • [8] Reporting standards, outcomes and costs of quality improvement studies in Ireland: a scoping review
    McCarthy, Siobhan Eithne
    Jabakhanji, Samira Barbara
    Martin, Jennifer
    Flynn, Maureen Alice
    Sorensen, Jan
    BMJ OPEN QUALITY, 2021, 10 (03)
  • [9] Publication Guidelines for Quality Improvement Studies in Healthcare: Evolution of the SQUIRE Project
    Davidoff, Frank
    Batalden, Paul
    Stevens, David
    Ogrinc, Greg
    Mooney, Susan
    CANADIAN JOURNAL OF DIABETES, 2008, 32 (04) : 281 - 289
  • [10] Notions of quality and standards for qualitative research reporting
    Pearson, Alan
    Jordan, Zoe
    Lockwood, Craig
    Aromataris, Ed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (05) : 670 - 676