Text mining of syntactic complexity in L2 writing: an LDA topic modeling approach

被引:0
作者
Huang, Zhiyun [1 ]
Jiang, Zhanhao [1 ]
机构
[1] Southeast Univ, Nanjing, Peoples R China
来源
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING | 2024年
关键词
syntactic complexity; second language writing; topic modeling; Latent Dirichlet Allocation; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; QUALITY; FLUENCY; ACCURACY; LANGUAGE; PROFICIENCY; WRITERS; TOOLS; PAIR;
D O I
10.1515/iral-2024-0132
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The present study provides an overview of syntactic complexity (SC) in second language (L2) writing research, employing the Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) topic modeling approach. Analyzing 470 abstracts sourced from the WoS Core Collection (2005-2023) and Scopus (1978-2023), this investigation explores the broad spectrum of research themes in SC in L2 writing. By employing perplexity and coherence tests, the study identifies the optimal number of topics in the model as five: writing quality, proficiency, genres, SC development, and task-based conditions. The finding reveals that: (1) In cross-sectional studies, the interplay among writing quality, proficiency levels, and genres often involves studying one variable as reliant on the others. Additionally, there is a growing inclination toward regarding phrasal structures as more dependable complexity indicators. (2) Longitudinal investigations predominantly emphasize the evolution of SC, yet there's a scarcity of exploration in continuation writing tasks. (3) Regarding measurement metrics, a transition from broader SC evaluations to more intricate assessments is evident, though several studies lack thorough examinations, particularly in continuation tasks.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 96 条
[1]  
Ai H., 2013, Automatic treatment and analysis of learner corpus data, P249, DOI DOI 10.1075/SCL.59.15AI
[3]  
Aletras N., 2013, P 10 INT C COMP SEM, P13
[4]  
Aydin Z, 2014, LANG LEARN TECHNOL, V18, P160
[5]   The Effects of Online Collaborative Writing and TOEIC Writing Test-Preparation on L2 Writing Performance [J].
Bailey, Daniel R. ;
Judd, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF ASIA TEFL, 2018, 15 (02) :383-397
[6]   Complexity, accuracy, and fluency in the argumentative writing of ESL and EFL learners [J].
Barrot, Jessie ;
Gabinete, Mari Karen .
IRAL-INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF APPLIED LINGUISTICS IN LANGUAGE TEACHING, 2021, 59 (02) :209-232
[7]   Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college -level L2 writers ' proficiency [J].
Barrot, Jessie S. ;
Agdeppa, Joan Y. .
ASSESSING WRITING, 2021, 47
[8]   Comparing narrative and expository text construction across adolescence: A developmental paradox [J].
Berman, Ruth A. ;
Nir-Sagiv, Bracha .
DISCOURSE PROCESSES, 2007, 43 (02) :79-120
[9]   Predicting Patterns of Grammatical Complexity Across Language Exam Task Types and Proficiency Levels [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Staples, Shelley .
APPLIED LINGUISTICS, 2016, 37 (05) :639-668
[10]   Should We Use Characteristics of Conversation to Measure Grammatical Complexity in L2 Writing Development? [J].
Biber, Douglas ;
Gray, Bethany ;
Poonpon, Kornwipa .
TESOL QUARTERLY, 2011, 45 (01) :5-35