Safety Assurance of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships

被引:0
|
作者
Wylie, M. [1 ]
Rajabally, E. [2 ]
机构
[1] BMT, Safety Capabil, Bath, Avon, England
[2] BMT, Maritime Autonomous Syst Campaign, Bath, Avon, England
关键词
D O I
10.1088/1742-6596/2867/1/012045
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Safety of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships (MASS) is inherently complex owing to the dynamic and unpredictable nature of the maritime environment. This is exacerbated by the pace of change in enabling technologies and their disruptive impact. Integral to the safety assurance of MASS is assessment and mitigation of risk. The International Maritime Organisation (IMO) defines Risk as "the combination of frequency and severity of the consequence". The advent of software-controlled systems has introduced difficulties in quantifying frequencies; an issue which is more prevalent in the context of autonomy due to the complex interaction between control algorithms and the variabilities of the environment in which they are deployed. Within complex autonomous systems, therefore it is challenging to perform quantitative risk assessments using failure rates, which gives rise to a need for different techniques to assess risk. Novel risk assessment methodologies such as those presented in the European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) Risk Based Assessment Tool (RBAT) combined with conventional risk assessment techniques can offer a solution to this challenge. Compliance with legislation and standards is another cornerstone of safety assurance, which is also inherently difficult for MASS vessels owing to their having been developed for conventional vessels. A goal-based approach to legislation compliance could present an interim solution until the IMO goal-based Maritime Autonomous Systems (MAS) provides harmonisation across the industry. Whilst MASS Safety assurance is non-trivial, there are solutions to many of the challenges faced; this paper examines the predominant challenges and presents potential solutions.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Levels of automation in maritime autonomous surface ships (MASS): a fuzzy logic approach
    Poornikoo, Mehdi
    Overgard, Kjell Ivar
    MARITIME ECONOMICS & LOGISTICS, 2022, 24 (02) : 278 - 301
  • [42] Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships from a risk governance perspective: Interpretation and implications
    Goerlandt, Floris
    SAFETY SCIENCE, 2020, 128
  • [43] Securing Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships: Cyber Threat Scenarios and Testbed Validation
    Lee, Seongmin
    No, Yonghun
    Cho, Juwon
    Jin, Guckhyeon
    Kim, Jeongho
    Lee, Jeongmin
    Jeon, Sanghyun
    Alfouzan, Faisal Abdulaziz
    Kim, Kyounggon
    IEEE ACCESS, 2025, 13 : 10311 - 10325
  • [44] Research on risk assessment of maritime autonomous surface ships based on catastrophe theory
    Zhang, Wenjun
    Zhang, Yingjun
    Zhang, Chuang
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2024, 244
  • [45] Exploring industry acceptance of maritime autonomous surface ships: A grounded theory approach
    Li, Yiteng
    Zhu, Ling
    RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT, 2024, 57
  • [47] Legal, Ethical and Industry Issues and Developments regarding Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
    Katsivela, Marel
    OCEAN YEARBOOK, 2023, 37 (01): : 506 - 541
  • [48] Path Planning of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships in Unknown Environment with Reinforcement Learning
    Wang, Chengbo
    Zhang, Xinyu
    Li, Ruijie
    Dong, Peifang
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, PT II, 2019, 1006 : 127 - 137
  • [49] Rules required for operating maritime autonomous surface ships from the viewpoint of seafarers
    Miyoshi, Toshiyuki
    Fujimoto, Shoji
    Rooks, Matthew
    Konishi, Tsukasa
    Suzuki, Rika
    JOURNAL OF NAVIGATION, 2022, 75 (02): : 384 - 399
  • [50] State-of-the-Art Research on Motion Control of Maritime Autonomous Surface Ships
    Wang, Le
    Wu, Qing
    Liu, Jialun
    Li, Shijie
    Negenborn, Rudy R.
    JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 7 (12)