Analytical Validation of Cxbladder® Detect, Triage, and Monitor: Assays for Detection and Management of Urothelial Carcinoma

被引:1
|
作者
Harvey, Justin C. [1 ]
Cambridge, Lisa M. [1 ,2 ]
Ellen, Charles W. [1 ]
Colonval, Megan [1 ]
Hazlett, Jody A. [1 ]
Newell, Jordan [3 ]
Zhou, Xin [1 ]
Guilford, Parry J. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Pacific Edge Diagnost NZ Ltd, 87 St David St, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
[2] T A Check Elect Ltd, Cambridge Qual Consulting, 204 Coast Rd, Waikouaiti 9471, New Zealand
[3] Pacific Edge Diagnost USA Ltd, 1214 Res Blvd, Hummelstown, PA 17036 USA
[4] Univ Otago, Dept Biochem, 710 Cumberland St, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
关键词
analytical validation; biomarkers; hematuria; monitoring; reverse transcription-quantitative PCR; urothelial carcinoma; urinary tests; BLADDER-CANCER; CLINICAL PATHWAY; CELL CARCINOMA; URINE TEST; FOLLOW-UP; HEMATURIA; STRATIFICATION; DIAGNOSIS; NEED;
D O I
10.3390/diagnostics14182061
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Cxbladder (R) assays are reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) tests incorporating five genetic biomarkers (CDK1, MDK, IGFBP5, HOXA13, and CXCR2) to provide risk stratification for urothelial carcinoma (UC) in patients with hematuria or undergoing surveillance for recurrent disease. This study evaluated the analytical validity of the Cxbladder Detect, Triage, and Monitor assays. Methods: Pre-specified acceptance criteria, including the assays' fundamental aspects (sample and reagent stability, RNA extraction quality, RT-qPCR linearity, and analytical sensitivity and specificity), accuracy and precision, and reproducibility between laboratories. Results: Cxbladder had an analytical sensitivity of 12.5-31.1 RNA copies/mL urine for the CDK1, MDK, IGFBP5, and HOXA13 UC biomarkers and 68.9 RNA copies/mL for the inflammatory biomarker CXCR2. All the pre-specified analytical criteria were met. Cxbladder had diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive values of 77%, 94%, 68%, and 96%, respectively, for Detect; 95%, 46%, 20%, and 98% for Triage; and 91%, 39%, 21%, and 96% for Monitor. Cxbladder had high analytical accuracy (<= 10.63% inaccuracy across all biomarkers) and good reproducibility (>85% concordance between laboratories). Conclusions: Cxbladder accurately and reproducibly detects UC biomarker expression and can aid clinicians in risk stratification of hematuria patients or those undergoing surveillance for recurrent UC.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] Validation of Cxbladder® Triage and Monitor as an Adjunct to Urothelial Carcinoma Diagnosis and Surveillance in a Single Centre
    Magee, Daniel
    Tharakan, Ninan
    Yuiminaga, Yuigi
    RESEARCH AND REPORTS IN UROLOGY, 2025, 17 : 87 - 94
  • [2] Clinical Utility of Cxbladder Monitor for Patients with a History of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Physician–Patient Real-World Clinical Data Analysis
    Tony Lough
    Qingyang Luo
    Paul O’Sullivan
    Christophe Chemaslé
    Michael Stotzer
    James Suttie
    David Darling
    Oncology and Therapy, 2018, 6 (1) : 73 - 85
  • [3] Clinical Utility of Cxbladder Monitor for Patients with a History of Urothelial Carcinoma: A Physician-Patient Real-World Clinical Data Analysis
    Lough, Tony
    Luo, Qingyang
    O'Sullivan, Paul
    Chemasle, Christophe
    Stotzer, Michael
    Suttie, James
    Darling, David
    ONCOLOGY AND THERAPY, 2018, 6 (01) : 73 - 85
  • [4] A holistic comparative analysis of diagnostic tests for urothelial carcinoma: a study of Cxbladder Detect, UroVysion® FISH, NMP22® and cytology based on imputation of multiple datasets
    Breen, Vivienne
    Kasabov, Nikola
    Kamat, Ashish M.
    Jacobson, Elsie
    Suttie, James M.
    O'Sullivan, Paul J.
    Kavalieris, Laimonis
    Darling, David G.
    BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2015, 15
  • [5] A holistic comparative analysis of diagnostic tests for urothelial carcinoma: a study of Cxbladder Detect, UroVysion® FISH, NMP22® and cytology based on imputation of multiple datasets
    Vivienne Breen
    Nikola Kasabov
    Ashish M. Kamat
    Elsie Jacobson
    James M. Suttie
    Paul J. O’Sullivan
    Laimonis Kavalieris
    David G. Darling
    BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15
  • [6] Analytical validation of a novel multi-target blood-based test to detect hepatocellular carcinoma
    Johnson, Andrea M.
    Dudek, Jeanne M.
    Edwards, David K.
    Myers, Theran A.
    Joseph, Patrick
    Laffin, Jennifer J.
    Bruinsma, Janelle J.
    EXPERT REVIEW OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS, 2021, 21 (11) : 1245 - 1252
  • [7] Clinical Evaluation of Two Non-Invasive Genetic Tests for Detection and Monitoring of Urothelial Carcinoma: Validation of UroVysion and Xpert Bladder Cancer Detection Test
    Kavcic, Niko
    Peric, Ivan
    Zagorac, Andreja
    Vokac, Nadja Kokalj
    FRONTIERS IN GENETICS, 2022, 13
  • [8] Large-scale Prospective Validation Study of a Multiplex RNA Urine Test for Noninvasive Detection of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
    Zhang, Hao
    Xu, Yue
    Wang, Kai
    Zheng, Chaoyue
    Li, Yanfeng
    Gong, Huijie
    Liu, Changming
    Sheng, Mingxiong
    Xu, Qinghua
    Sun, Yifeng
    Chen, Jinying
    Zhang, Xiaodong
    Zhang, Changwen
    Zhang, Hongxian
    Wang, Wei
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2024, 7 (06): : 1384 - 1393
  • [9] Prospective Validation of the Clinical Usefulness of Reflex Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Assay in Patients With Atypical Cytology for the Detection of Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder
    Schlomer, Bruce J.
    Ho, Richard
    Sagalowsky, Arthur
    Ashfaq, Raheela
    Lotan, Yair
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (01) : 62 - 67
  • [10] Clinical Value of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Impact on Detection of Metastases and Patient Management
    Tanaka, Hajime
    Yoshida, Soichiro
    Komai, Yoshinobu
    Sakai, Yasuyuki
    Urakami, Shinji
    Yuasa, Takeshi
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Masuda, Hitoshi
    Koizumi, Mitsuru
    Kohno, Atsushi
    Fukui, Iwao
    Yonese, Junji
    Fujii, Yasuhisa
    Kihara, Kazunori
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2016, 96 (01) : 65 - 72