Stimulatory Functions of Male Genitalia in Tipula (Triplicitipula) colei Alexander and Tipula (Lunatipula) translucida Doane (Diptera: Tipulidae) and Implications for Theories of Genital Evolution

被引:1
作者
Eberhard, William G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Gelhaus, Jon K. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Costa Rica, Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Ciudad Univ, San Pedro, Costa Rica
[2] Univ Costa Rica, Escuela Biol, Ciudad Univ, San Pedro, Costa Rica
[3] Louisiana State Univ, Museum Nat Sci, Baton Rouge, LA 70808 USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Acad Nat Sci, Dept Biodivers Earth & Environm Sci, 1900 Ben Franklin Pkwy, Philadelphia, PA 19103 USA
关键词
sexual selection; genital behavior; rapid divergent evolution; species isolation; lock-and-key; sexually antagonistic coevolution; cryptic female choice; SEXUAL SELECTION; COLEOPTERA; COPULATION; COURTSHIP;
D O I
10.3390/insects15090680
中图分类号
Q96 [昆虫学];
学科分类号
摘要
Simple Summary: The morphological designs and the behavior (rhythmic brushing, vibrating, scraping, and tapping) of the male genitalia in two species of crane flies indicate that male genital structures in both species function to stimulate the female during copulation. These observations are used to test current theoretical explanations of the rapid divergent evolution of male genitalia of animals with internal insemination. Male genitalia have been hypothesized to function as courtship devices during copulation, but it is difficult to use behavioral observations to test this hypothesis because male genitalia are usually hidden inside the female during copulation. In tipuloid flies, however, nearly all of the male's complex genital structures remain outside the female. Copulation behavior and genital morphology in Tipula (Triplicitipula) colei and T. (Lunatipula) translucida suggest that some male genital structures function to stimulate the female: male structures that contact the female bear tufts or dense arrays of modified setae on precisely the surfaces that contact the female; contact involves repeated, stereotyped rhythmic movements that include brushing, vibrating, scraping, and tapping; the movements are appropriately designed to utilize the morphology of the modified setae to stimulate the female; and the movements have little or no other perceptible mechanical effects on the female. The female structures contacted by these male genital movements fail to show the defensive designs predicted by the theories of genital evolution that are based on morphological species isolation or male-female morphological conflicts of interest; also unexplained by the conflict of interest hypothesis are female movements that seem designed to increase rather than avoid stimulation by the male.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 48 条
[21]  
Flowers RW, 2006, REV BIOL TROP, V54, P829
[22]  
Frommer S. L., 1963, Kansas University Science Bulletin, V44, P535
[23]  
Gelhaus Jon K., 2005, Memoirs of the American Entomological Society, V46, P1
[24]  
HEMMINGSEN A M, 1970, Bonner Zoologische Beitraege, V21, P137
[25]  
Hemmingsen A. M., 1966, Videnskabelige Meddelelser Dansk naturh Foren, V129, P261
[26]  
Hemmingsen A. M., 1970, Vidensk. Meddr dansk. naturh. Foren, V133, P159
[27]  
Hemmingsen A. M., 1954, Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjobenhavn, V116, P411
[28]  
Hemmingsen A. M., 1952, Videnskabelige Meddelelser fra Dansk Naturhistorisk Forening i Kjobenhavn, V114, P365
[29]  
HEMMINGSEN AXEL M., 1962, VIDENSK MEDD DANSK NATURHIST FORENING I KOBENHAVN, V124, P135
[30]   Sexual selection and genital evolution [J].
Hosken, DJ ;
Stockley, P .
TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2004, 19 (02) :87-93