Sources of well-being and cardiovascular health: A mixed methods investigation from the MIDUS study

Objective: Using mixed methods, we investigated whether different sources of well-being were associated with better cardiovascular health. Methods: Data came from adults (55% women; 19% Black, 75% White) with biomarker data from the Midlife in the United States (MIDUS) Study. At the second wave and in a refresher cohort, participants answered the question "What do you do to make your life go well?" Judges evaluated each response for the presence of 12 sources of well-being (e.g., positive relationships, faith, health maintenance). Participants were also assessed on 8 components of cardiovascular health at two waves, an average of 12 years apart. Concurrent (N = 2036) and longitudinal (N = 650) linear regressions examined the association between each well-being source in unadjusted models and models adjusted for sociodemographic factors and word count. Results: Adults who wrote about positive relationships, positive attitudes, enjoyment, coping, health maintenance, and planning tended to have better cardiovascular health in unadjusted models concurrently and longitudinally. In fully adjusted models, health maintenance (p < .001) and planning and organization (p = .004) were associated with better cardiovascular health concurrently. Additionally, health maintenance (p = .03) and work (p = .04) were associated with better cardiovascular health longitudinally. Conclusions: Individuals who endorsed maintaining their health as central to well-being showed healthier cardiovascular outcomes 12 years later. Combining qualitative assessments of sources of well-being with clinically assessed measures of cardiovascular health highlights unique contributors of well-being that are relevant for health and may not be evident with conventional self-report measures.