Surgical treatments for older breast cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world evidence

Background: Older patients with breast cancer are often underrepresented in clinical trials, leading to a lack of evidence-based guidelines for surgical treatment in this cohort. Consequently, synthesizing realworld data is crucial for determining the optimal surgical management of geriatric patients with breast cancer. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. The review included clinical studies evaluating treatments in patients aged >= 65 years with breast cancer. Comparisons were made between primary surgical treatment and endocrine therapy alone, breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy versus mastectomy, sentinel lymph node biopsy versus omission of sentinel lymph node biopsy, and surgery plus axillary lymph node dissection versus omission of axillary lymph node dissection. Results: A total of 44 studies were analyzed. Surgery significantly increased overall survival, breast cancer-specific survival, and recurrence-free survival compared with endocrine therapy alone. Pooled estimates revealed that mastectomy yielded significantly better prognoses than breast-conserving surgery without radiotherapy in terms of both overall survival and breast cancer-specific survival. Omitting sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection did not significantly reduce overall survival. Conclusions: For older patients with breast cancer, primary surgical treatment significantly enhances survival and regional control compared with endocrine therapy alone without compromising quality of life. Frail patients with nonmetastatic breast cancer who are unwilling to undergo radiotherapy benefit from mastectomy, with no notable psychosocial decline compared with breast-conserving surgery alone. Sentinel lymph node biopsy omission does not increase recurrence rates or mortality, and avoiding axillary lymph node dissection may be viable for node-positive older patients due to its comparable survival outcomes. (c) 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.