Transparency and fact-checking in open societies

Transparency is more than a motto for professional fact-checkers; it is a professional requirement that permeates their daily practice. Although transparency has been theorised and critiqued extensively in journalism studies, there has been less research on its practical implications for news workers. This paper aims to fill this gap by focusing on fact-checking practices in the Nordic countries. The paper highlights the double-edged sword of transparency by drawing on 14 semistructured interviews with fact-checkers and newsroom managers from the four independent fact-checking organisations in Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark. Transparency is seen as a means to achieve accountability and credibility in reporting and as a tool to hold public figures accountable. However, transparency does not protect Nordic fact-checkers from criticism or harassment for delivering uncomfortable truths. This study also links fact-checkers discourses with the material traces of transparency on their respective websites, showing that transparency can be approached differently in practice. This research provides valuable insights into the nuanced role of transparency in fact-checkers' daily routines while acknowledging its limitations in that transparency is not without flaws, even in societies characterised by a culture of openness and transparency.