High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Prong Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children With Moderate to Severe Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Maya, Malini [1 ]
Rameshkumar, Ramachandran [1 ,2 ]
Selvan, Tamil [1 ]
Delhikumar, Chinnaiah Govindhareddy [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
[2] Mohammed Bin Rashid Univ & Hlth Sci, Mediclin City Hosp, Dept Pediat, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
bronchiolitis; children; high-flow nasal cannula; mechanical ventilation; nasal prong continuous positive airway pressure; respiratory support; PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; VIRAL BRONCHIOLITIS; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; THERAPY; OXYGEN; CPAP;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000003521
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal prong bubble continuous positive airway pressure (b-CPAP) in children with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Design: A randomized controlled trial was carried out from August 2019 to February 2022. (Clinical Trials Registry of India number CTRI/2019/07/020402). Setting: Pediatric emergency ward and ICU within a tertiary care center in India. Patients: Children 1-23 months old with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Intervention: Comparison of HFNC with b-CPAP, using a primary outcome of treatment failure within 24 hours of randomization, as defined by any of: 1) a 1-point increase in modified Wood's clinical asthma score (m-WCAS) above baseline, 2) a rise in respiratory rate (RR) greater than 10 per minute from baseline, and 3) escalation in respiratory support. The secondary outcomes were success rate after crossover, if any, need for mechanical ventilation (invasive/noninvasive), local skin lesions, length of hospital stay, and complications. Results: In 118 children analyzed by intention-to-treat, HFNC ( n = 59) versus b-CPAP ( n = 59) was associated with a lower failure rate (23.7% vs. 42.4%; relative risk [95% CI], RR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.97], p = 0.031). The Cox proportion model confirmed a lower hazard of treatment failure in the HFNC group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.94], p = 0.032). No crossover was noted. A lower proportion escalated to noninvasive ventilation in the HFNC group (15.3%) versus the b-CPAP group (15.3% vs. 39% [RR 0.39 (95% CI, 0.20-0.77)], p = 0.004). The HFNC group had a longer median (interquartile range) duration of oxygen therapy (4 [3-6] vs. 3 [3-5] d; p = 0.012) and hospital stay (6 [5-8.5] vs. 5 [4-7] d, p = 0.021). No significant difference was noted in other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: In children aged one to 23 months with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis, the use of HFNC therapy as opposed to b-CPAP for early respiratory support is associated with a lower failure rate and, secondarily, a lower risk of escalation to mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 757
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Short-Term High-Flow Nasal Cannula for Moderate to Severe Bronchiolitis Is Effective in a General Pediatric Ward
    Sachs, Nimrod
    Rom, Eran
    Schonfeld, Tommy
    Gavish, Rachel
    Berger, Itay
    Krause, Irit
    CLINICAL PEDIATRICS, 2019, 58 (14) : 1522 - 1527
  • [32] High flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) for the initial respiratory management of acute viral bronchiolitis in young infants: a multicenter randomized controlled trial (TRAMONTANE study)
    Christophe Milési
    Sandrine Essouri
    Robin Pouyau
    Jean-Michel Liet
    Mickael Afanetti
    Aurélie Portefaix
    Julien Baleine
    Sabine Durand
    Clémentine Combes
    Aymeric Douillard
    Gilles Cambonie
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2017, 43 : 209 - 216
  • [33] High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants
    Spence, K. L.
    Murphy, D.
    Kilian, C.
    McGonigle, R.
    Kilani, R. A.
    JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2007, 27 (12) : 772 - 775
  • [34] High-flow nasal cannula as a device to provide continuous positive airway pressure in infants
    K L Spence
    D Murphy
    C Kilian
    R McGonigle
    R A Kilani
    Journal of Perinatology, 2007, 27 : 772 - 775
  • [35] The infant with severe bronchiolitis: from high flow nasal cannula to continuous positive airway pressure and mechanical ventilation
    Wolfler, Andrea
    Raimondi, Gianfranco
    Pagan de Paganis, Cecilia
    Zoia, Elena
    MINERVA PEDIATRICA, 2018, 70 (06) : 612 - 622
  • [36] Heated Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Post-extubation Respiratory Support in Preterm Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Yengkhom, Rameshwor
    Suryawanshi, Pradeep
    Gupta, Bhvya
    Deshpande, Sujata
    JOURNAL OF TROPICAL PEDIATRICS, 2021, 67 (01)
  • [37] Using a high-flow nasal cannula provided superior results to low-flow oxygen delivery in moderate to severe bronchiolitis
    Milani, Gregorio P.
    Plebani, Anna M.
    Arturi, Elisa
    Brusa, Danila
    Esposito, Susanna
    Dell'Era, Laura
    Laicini, Emanuela A.
    Consonni, Dario
    Agostoni, Carlo
    Fossali, Emilio F.
    ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2016, 105 (08) : E368 - E372
  • [38] Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Outside the ICU for Previously Healthy Children With Bronchiolitis
    Dadlez, Nina M.
    Esteban-Cruciani, Nora
    Khan, Asama
    Shi, Yi
    McKenna, Kevin J.
    Azzarone, Gabriella
    Southern, William N.
    RESPIRATORY CARE, 2019, 64 (11) : 1410 - 1415
  • [39] Physiologic Basis for Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Heated and Humidified High-Flow Nasal Cannula, and Nasal Ventilation
    Dysart, Kevin C.
    CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY, 2016, 43 (04) : 621 - +
  • [40] Commentary on High-Flow Nasal Cannula and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Practices After the First-Line Support for Assistance in Breathing in Children Trials
    Shein, Steven L.
    Kneyber, Martin C. J.
    Rotta, Alexandre T.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 23 (12) : 1076 - 1083