High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Nasal Prong Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Children With Moderate to Severe Acute Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

被引:3
|
作者
Maya, Malini [1 ]
Rameshkumar, Ramachandran [1 ,2 ]
Selvan, Tamil [1 ]
Delhikumar, Chinnaiah Govindhareddy [1 ]
机构
[1] Jawaharlal Inst Postgrad Med Educ & Res JIPMER, Dept Pediat, Div Pediat Crit Care, Pondicherry, India
[2] Mohammed Bin Rashid Univ & Hlth Sci, Mediclin City Hosp, Dept Pediat, Pediat Intens Care Unit, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
bronchiolitis; children; high-flow nasal cannula; mechanical ventilation; nasal prong continuous positive airway pressure; respiratory support; PEDIATRIC INTENSIVE-CARE; VIRAL BRONCHIOLITIS; MANAGEMENT; INFANTS; THERAPY; OXYGEN; CPAP;
D O I
10.1097/PCC.0000000000003521
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) versus nasal prong bubble continuous positive airway pressure (b-CPAP) in children with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Design: A randomized controlled trial was carried out from August 2019 to February 2022. (Clinical Trials Registry of India number CTRI/2019/07/020402). Setting: Pediatric emergency ward and ICU within a tertiary care center in India. Patients: Children 1-23 months old with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis. Intervention: Comparison of HFNC with b-CPAP, using a primary outcome of treatment failure within 24 hours of randomization, as defined by any of: 1) a 1-point increase in modified Wood's clinical asthma score (m-WCAS) above baseline, 2) a rise in respiratory rate (RR) greater than 10 per minute from baseline, and 3) escalation in respiratory support. The secondary outcomes were success rate after crossover, if any, need for mechanical ventilation (invasive/noninvasive), local skin lesions, length of hospital stay, and complications. Results: In 118 children analyzed by intention-to-treat, HFNC ( n = 59) versus b-CPAP ( n = 59) was associated with a lower failure rate (23.7% vs. 42.4%; relative risk [95% CI], RR 0.56 [95% CI, 0.32-0.97], p = 0.031). The Cox proportion model confirmed a lower hazard of treatment failure in the HFNC group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.48 [95% CI, 0.25-0.94], p = 0.032). No crossover was noted. A lower proportion escalated to noninvasive ventilation in the HFNC group (15.3%) versus the b-CPAP group (15.3% vs. 39% [RR 0.39 (95% CI, 0.20-0.77)], p = 0.004). The HFNC group had a longer median (interquartile range) duration of oxygen therapy (4 [3-6] vs. 3 [3-5] d; p = 0.012) and hospital stay (6 [5-8.5] vs. 5 [4-7] d, p = 0.021). No significant difference was noted in other secondary outcomes. Conclusion: In children aged one to 23 months with moderate to severe acute bronchiolitis, the use of HFNC therapy as opposed to b-CPAP for early respiratory support is associated with a lower failure rate and, secondarily, a lower risk of escalation to mechanical ventilation.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 757
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical review of High Flow Nasal Cannula and Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in pediatric acute respiratory distress
    Kadafi, Kurniawan Taufiq
    Yuliarto, Saptadi
    Monica, Charity
    Susanto, William Prayogo
    ANNALS OF MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2022, 73
  • [22] Comparison of high flow nasal cannula and non-invasive positive pressure ventilation in children with bronchiolitis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Zhong, Zhaoshuang
    Zhao, Long
    Zhao, Yan
    Xia, Shuyue
    FRONTIERS IN PEDIATRICS, 2022, 10
  • [23] High-Flow Nasal Prong Oxygen Therapy or Nasopharyngeal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for Children With Moderate-to-Severe Respiratory Distress?
    ten Brink, Fia
    Duke, Trevor
    Evans, Janine
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2013, 14 (07) : E326 - E331
  • [24] Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in Bronchiolitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Lal, Sandeep Narayan
    Kaur, Jaspreet
    Anthwal, Pooja
    Goyal, Kanika
    Bahl, Pinky
    Puliyel, Jacob M.
    INDIAN PEDIATRICS, 2018, 55 (01) : 27 - 30
  • [25] Comparison between high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) therapy and noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in children with acute respiratory failure by bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial
    Santos, Ana Carolina Etrusco Zaroni
    Caiado, Carolina Marques
    Lopes, Alessandra Geisler Daud
    de Franca, Gabriela Cunha
    Eisen, Ana Karolina Antunes
    Oliveira, Danielle Bruna Leal
    de Araujo, Orlei Ribeiro
    de Carvalho, Werther Brunow
    BMC PEDIATRICS, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [26] Oral Feeding for Infants and Children Receiving Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure and High-Flow Nasal Cannula Respiratory Supports: A Survey of Practice
    Canning, Angie
    Fairhurst, Rachael
    Chauhan, Manbir
    Weir, Kelly A.
    DYSPHAGIA, 2020, 35 (03) : 443 - 454
  • [27] Nasopharyngeal Airway Pressures in Bronchiolitis Patients Treated With High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy
    Arora, Bhawana
    Mahajan, Prashant
    Zidan, Marwan A.
    Sethuraman, Usha
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2012, 28 (11) : 1179 - 1184
  • [28] Outcomes of Children With Bronchiolitis Treated With High-Flow Nasal Cannula or Noninvasive Positive Pressure Ventilation
    Clayton, Jason A.
    McKee, Bryan
    Slain, Katherine N.
    Rotta, Alexandre T.
    Shein, Steven L.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2019, 20 (02) : 128 - 135
  • [29] Efficacy and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen Therapy in Moderate and Severe Bronchiolitis
    Kapur, Sunil V.
    Oswal, Jitendra S.
    Sarangi, Bhakti
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC RESEARCH, 2019, 13 (03) : SC11 - SC14
  • [30] First-line treatment using high-flow nasal cannula for children with severe bronchiolitis: Applicability and risk factors for failure
    Guillot, C.
    Le Reun, C.
    Behal, H.
    Labreuche, J.
    Recher, M.
    Duhamel, A.
    Leteurtre, S.
    ARCHIVES DE PEDIATRIE, 2018, 25 (03): : 213 - 218